Riksrevision - My Point of View
Day 5,522, 13:47
•
Published in Sweden 
•
by
•
by Turnbeutel
Riksrevision - My point of View
Editorial:
In today's article, I'm going to talk about the current riksrevision. Based on the following article:
https://www.erepublik.com/de/article/rapport-fr-n-riksrevisionen-del-1-2762518/1/20
After reading the article from Kape, I felt that there is something missing here. How so ?
Neither I - or we - got information whats the current object (except of "We're looking at the current money status" nor what it's purpose. It's looked like an audit without a plan.
So I want to help to carry out an audition with comparative values and assumptions in order to produce a clear picture.
Control also means maintaining an overview.
1. Small digression
First of all, it is important to define the test object. For us, this lies in the use of funds.
A basic assumption must be made in this before the test. The basic assumption provisionally defines how high the government's actual financial leeway is during a period.
You can already read that from here: https://www.erepublik.com/de/country/economy/Sweden
So in an observation period of 5,495 - 5,500
Now we can see that the average daily income is 62,773 kr.
On day 5,509, the Riksbanken was paid out 400,000 kr in cash.
This corresponds to the tax revenue of 6.4 days.
Extrapolated (you can now get really precise and calculate the whole table – but after all, I'm not the riksrevisor!!)
the Swedish government has approximately 1,883,190 kr (30 x 62,773 kr) per month at its disposal. Whether this pays off now or not.
(This is an assumption that we have derived from above)
2. questions which has to be answered
a) what is done with the budget?
b.) What are the expenses has the government?
On average? Which are regular? What is other than regular? Why are there except regular payments ?
e) What happens to surpluses?
3. Continuation
In addition to the stock control that Kape mentioned, the use must also be checked with an assessment. This also means that expenses are allocated according to their proportionality.
This also means that if there have been or should be payouts to players, random checks are carried out:
a) To what extent did individual players receive something?
b.) Which funding programs are to be assessed and to what extent?
c) Did players get anything at all? (e.g. to be determined by a random question to the player)
d) How reliable are the answers?
Here, comparative calculations are to be made, which should reflect an approximate result. With your own assessment, you are now checking the figures presented for plausibility.
It's not about turning every penny, it's about identifying larger deviations.
Are these plausible? Why were there such large deviations from your own assessment? How are expenses legally defined and described?
An audit is a game of thorough preparatory work and constant asking questions in order to get a picture later. Either a positive or a negative.
But it's worth it. If the result afterwards appears plausible and is basically in order. That creates trust. In the Audition, in the government, in the people. The basis on which our system is based.
If there're any questions please don't hestitate to contact me!
Cheers your
Turnbeutel
Riksdagsledamot
Editorial:
In today's article, I'm going to talk about the current riksrevision. Based on the following article:
https://www.erepublik.com/de/article/rapport-fr-n-riksrevisionen-del-1-2762518/1/20
After reading the article from Kape, I felt that there is something missing here. How so ?
Neither I - or we - got information whats the current object (except of "We're looking at the current money status" nor what it's purpose. It's looked like an audit without a plan.
So I want to help to carry out an audition with comparative values and assumptions in order to produce a clear picture.
Control also means maintaining an overview.
1. Small digression
First of all, it is important to define the test object. For us, this lies in the use of funds.
A basic assumption must be made in this before the test. The basic assumption provisionally defines how high the government's actual financial leeway is during a period.
You can already read that from here: https://www.erepublik.com/de/country/economy/Sweden
So in an observation period of 5,495 - 5,500
Now we can see that the average daily income is 62,773 kr.
On day 5,509, the Riksbanken was paid out 400,000 kr in cash.
This corresponds to the tax revenue of 6.4 days.
Extrapolated (you can now get really precise and calculate the whole table – but after all, I'm not the riksrevisor!!)
the Swedish government has approximately 1,883,190 kr (30 x 62,773 kr) per month at its disposal. Whether this pays off now or not.
(This is an assumption that we have derived from above)
2. questions which has to be answered
a) what is done with the budget?
b.) What are the expenses has the government?
On average? Which are regular? What is other than regular? Why are there except regular payments ?
e) What happens to surpluses?
3. Continuation
In addition to the stock control that Kape mentioned, the use must also be checked with an assessment. This also means that expenses are allocated according to their proportionality.
This also means that if there have been or should be payouts to players, random checks are carried out:
a) To what extent did individual players receive something?
b.) Which funding programs are to be assessed and to what extent?
c) Did players get anything at all? (e.g. to be determined by a random question to the player)
d) How reliable are the answers?
Here, comparative calculations are to be made, which should reflect an approximate result. With your own assessment, you are now checking the figures presented for plausibility.
It's not about turning every penny, it's about identifying larger deviations.
Are these plausible? Why were there such large deviations from your own assessment? How are expenses legally defined and described?
An audit is a game of thorough preparatory work and constant asking questions in order to get a picture later. Either a positive or a negative.
But it's worth it. If the result afterwards appears plausible and is basically in order. That creates trust. In the Audition, in the government, in the people. The basis on which our system is based.
If there're any questions please don't hestitate to contact me!
Cheers your
Turnbeutel
Riksdagsledamot
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Excellent article, Thank you!
Excellent article. I doubt Jeppe has read anything this smart since he started playing.
I think the main issue is that Riksrevisionen is an idea created by Umut (Nobels candidate this month), and since the Government lack ideas and goals for their 6+ year long journey as oppressors of Sweden, well they stole the idea 100% all the way and put Kape and Misho to run it like puppets.
And that's why they are unable to produce any results after a full month of "work". Stealing someone else's idea and plan dosent mean you can execute it. If Umut had control (or maybe you?) over Riksrevisionen im sure it would be able to produce accurate results of our finances.
just watch his conversation with turn its a roller coaster and thank you for supporting my messages at the bottom they keep sweeping all the important questions under the rug
To put in in perspective, you did more work for Riksrevisionen in under an hour than Kape & Misho did in a month. And you have nothing to do with Riksrevisionen. 😃
turn is an incredible addition to sweden and Nobelkommitén
Thank you ! Being honest this is the first time we're gaming makes fun again !
Why is it engelska, är you not a swensktalande? Very svårt to läs, speciellt economiska utryck
Stop making fun of immigrants you racist
Va? Gör du narr av min engelska din elaka typ?
att svara på något sakligt är ett tecken på inkompetens
Även om det är osmakligt?
dela sedan din åsikt med varför det är fel för dig?
your comments are a bit osmakligt jeps
Votado y endosado y suscrito
Hello
Hi
No information about the current mandate by kape and no information on the past 6 years all agencies have been closed down by the government and they are claiming the budget is going up except the money they take for themself
very well written article with a lot of questions that should have been answered by the government but they refuse to do so
it was calculated aprox ~200m cc should be in the orgs while the government are claiming a surplus with their 24 million cc
we can see the past 6 years in articles by the government and in the org newspapers since all agencies was closed down there has been about ~6 articles per year in the swedish article feed with no real substance a few handouts and when they occur the top players for handouts are themself a reoccurring scenario that they want to boost their own accounts with the help of the swedish treasury this is also a reality if you look closely at the handouts since Nobelkommitén was created always top players and first in line for the handouts are the ruling elite
how much money was accepted from outside sources for other countries was allowed to occupy swedish regions ~1-3m per country every month to their own personal accounts with and traceability to the orgs are non existent
where are all the government owned facilities
superthief stole everything we have nothing
6 years of regular pryamid schemes and stealing from superg, zingo and now jeppe
I am fairly certain zingo has been bamboozled by superthief and are to scared to admit it or was in the loop but did not care since they killed of the entire country by bullying new and returning players
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Lägg ned med alla falska påhitt, pinsam nivå.
ooo fan like your own article of fantasies you do not speak for Nobelkommitén is that understood
Can you please explain your message ?
Fin artikel och otroligt intressanta frågeställningar!
Jag tror att frågorna är svårbesvarade på grund utav en bristande nationell ekonomisk politik. Det finns ingen plan, mål eller syfte. Att ge sig ett seriöst försök till att besvara frågorna öppnar faktiskt upp till att forma en idé om ekonomisk politik som vi kan tänkas ha i eSverige.
Jag tycker att det är värt att ta en vända och sätta sig ner kring frågorna som riksdagsledamot Turnbeutel lyfter.
många frågor inga svar
voted
Fin artikel 🙂
voted it.