Response to Comments: Is the War on Belgium a Training War?

Day 1,848, 17:29 Published in United Kingdom United Kingdom by Topdop

I realize that many of those associated with the government have been making comments on some of my previous articles that imply that the war on Belgium is just a practice; that we will basically give the land back after we have some Battle Heroes and True Patriots from our conquest. This is extremely irrational on many levels, so I will divulge into how.

1. Belgium is not allied with the United Kingdom. Therefore, officially, we can cream the snot out of them and they can't retaliate (beyond a resistance war, that is). This means that Belgium is being too trusting of the UK, since I believe that some military units will order for their troops to "fight for the UK in Flanders" or "fight for the UK in Brussels", etc.
2. I'm going to shoot down the comments that we're "letting Belgium win" this war: they're just plain wrong. We're creaming and conquering, and I wouldn't be surprised if Belgium was wiped off the map by 11:59:59 ET tomorrow.
3. We've conquered Flanders, and are about to conquer Brussels. If this was "just a training war", we'd be seeing a Resistance War in Flanders, and we wouldn't be creaming Belgium in Brussels right now.

Therefore, I believe that these comments are government propaganda meant to discourage the Belgians. If that's what it is, then I'm sorry for exposing it, but in my next article, I will explain why I am anyways.

This article was written by Topdop, who resides in London.