Long live the Democracy / Xo Dictatorship

Day 3,394, 13:43 Published in United Kingdom United Kingdom by Aecio Neves45

News Neves

Parliament

Our dear friend Aecio Neves 45 went to Parliament to give a Discourse on Democracy

Starting the Discursso

[img]I confess, I was a bit nervous at the time but it went well[/img]

Finally here is the speech given by Aetius in front of everyone in Parliament
Not long ago, in a chat about politics, a truly well-meaning person used a kind of discourse that is very common among people who advocate FREEDOM & DEMOCRACY.
Wrote the person about why he believes that DEMOCRATIC POSITIONING is ACCEPTING ANY & ANY OPINION on FORMS OF POLITICAL ORGANIZATION:


"I understand your position, but I think in a state of law ALL forms of thinking must be respected, from the extreme right to the extreme left.

(...)

What we can not do is prevent thoughts that are contrary to ours from being exposed. Then we become as dictators as those. "


This is a very common discourse, current discourse; I believe that many of my friends, good people, well-intentioned people, as well as the person who wrote the above lines, think so. I Do not. Because, deep down, I see a dialectic question SERIOUS.

Here is my answer:


"But there is a problem in the proposed question: if we consider that the state is a state of RIGHT, that is, if we consider that the state is a state where CITIZENS 'RIGHTS MUST BE FULLY RESPECTED, that is to say that in a STATE OF RIGHT OF ALL CITIZENS, there must be no political forms that RESTRICT RIGHTS OF CERTAIN GROUPS OF THE COMPANY.

The big problem is that a political position, for example, FASCISTA, one of the facets of the extreme right, the most radical, of course, EXCLUDES THE STATE OF RIGHT OF SOME SOCIAL GROUPS (blacks, homosexuals & women) because of PRECONCEITOS that, more Than all known, as all prejudices, are UNABLE after so many socio-cultural & scientific proofs. It is more than known that blacks, homosexuals & women have nothing different from the white adult male always in charge (as Caetano Veloso has said).

Therefore, in order for a state to GUARANTEE THE SOVEREIGNTY OF EXPRESSION OF ALL CITIZENS, it is necessary to guarantee forms of political organization that prioritize exactly the rights that, in certain forms of organization, such as in the POLITICAL ORGANIZATION OF FASCIST CUNHO, therefore, organization of EXTREME RIGHT, Are REMOVED FROM CERTAIN SOCIAL GROUPS. This type of organization DOES NOT DESERVE RESPECT THAT IT DOES NOT RESPECT RIGHTS.

This is a basic principle: DO YOU REQUEST RESPECT? FOR, BEFORE, RESPECT. "

____________________________________________________________

My question is: RESPECT WHO SHOULD RESPECT.

DEMOCRATIC POSITIONING SHOULD NOT ACCEPT ANTI-DEMOCRATIC POSITIONING.

This is incoherent: to give voice to those who want to cut voices (!).
Many Members of Parliament have alluded to Aecio Neves 45



[img]And Aecio Neves, Thanks and threatens Trico for trying to cause a dictatorship in the country speaking, It is never easy to bring down a united democracy.[/img]

I hope you have liked the article and vote for it so that everyone can see it faster.