HitlerWasFunOfAtaturk
Day 3,315, 08:11
•
Published in Serbia 
•
by
•
by cirujanoo
Hitler took Atatürk's example to himself
What is told in the book called 'Hitler was a fan of Ataturk'?
01/12/2014 15:42
PrintPocketPinterestGoogle + TumblrWhatsAppTwitterTelegramFacebook400
Hitler was a fan of
Adolf Hitler was deeply fun of Ataturk
Early in his career, Adolf Hitler took inspiration from Benito Mussolini, his senior colleague in fascism—this fact is widely known. But an equally important role model for Hitler and the Nazis has been almost entirely neglecte
Hitler was deeply interested in Turkish affairs after 1919. He not only admired but also sought to imitate Atatürk’s radical construction of a new nation from the ashes of defeat in World War I. Hitler and the Nazis watched closely as Atatürk defied the Western powers to seize government, and they modeled the Munich Putsch to a large degree on Atatürk’s rebellion in Ankara. Hitler later remarked that in the political aftermath of the Great War, Atatürk was his master, he and Mussolini his students.
This was no fading fascination. As the Nazis struggled through the 1920s, Atatürk remained Hitler’s “star in the darkness,” his inspiration for remaking Germany along nationalist, secular, totalitarian, and ethnically exclusive lines. Nor did it escape Hitler’s notice how ruthlessly Turkish governments had dealt with Armenian and Greek minorities, whom influential Nazis directly compared with German Jews. The New Turkey, or at least those aspects of it that the Nazis chose to see, became a model for Hitler’s plans and dreams in the years leading up to the invasion of Poland.
i wrote this article in israel
commented there
Vlad Gordin 69 Vlad Gordin Day 3,314, 09:55
Report Don't mix RL and the game ReplyVote 0
Krimpie 170 Krimpie Day 3,314, 11:08
A very interesting read, wil vote and endorse it if you can explain wtf it has to do with erep. ReplyVote 0
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 03:02
I was believing Ataturk when i was teenager, and i met and work and fight in revolutionary front when i was 20 - 22 in Istanbul. At that ages Istanbul has hundred thousands revolutionary comrades. My experiences and observations shows me Ataturk was revolutionary if i compare Ataturk to Ottoman Sultanate. But when I compare it with the 20th century's reality, it was not as liberal for the people of Ataturk. Ataturk did good revolutions but he did not allow more contemporary revolutions. Turkey had 2 times democracy trial was canceled by ataturk, the parties were closed and the one under the control of the closing parties arrested the former comrades they had built together together with the republican war and blamed for homeland treachery but they were released because they did not have crimes but they were taken away from the authorities of the country.
By the way Ataturk is good revolutionary despite Hitler.
I mean Hitler was fun of Ataturk's conservative revolutionary.
I would like to say here that I like Atatürk's revolutionism, but I am angry because Ataturk prevented revolutioniary to improve turkish revolutions.
Ataturk prevented not only TKP revolutionaries, but also Ataturk prevented Bourgeois revolutionaries too.
Ataturk wanted to be sole supreme leader.
Hitler took this example of Ataturk's feature. ReplyVote 0
Hoffaa. Hoffaa. You should search better before making comments like these. Ataturk in fact, is the founder of the other political parties also. He helped a lot with founding of other parties. And yeah, he had to close them later on because those parties were aiming to hurt the Newly Founded country, not help it develop further. Now let me give you an example, Tell me, how many political parties existed in Serbia parliament to this day that supported Kosovo to be found? Around 1 or 2 . ReplyVote 0 Day 3,315, 05:10
XenonZen
why a fascist focused a social revolutionary? on what direction did Hitler take Ataturk as an example? Vote 0 Day 3,315, 05:19
Hoffaa. Hoffaa. If you are talking about Ataturk's way, it was never fascist focused nor anything close to fascist thought. Hitler took example from how Ataturk made a country with nothing a very strong country with his principles and economic opinions. Vote 0 Day 3,315, 05:26
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 06:16
Hoffaa, Ataturk was not fascist but he has secter style that he wasted his oponents. Yes ataturk was progressive but he liquidated his rivals.. Turks inspired him 'TEK ADAM' (unrivaled leader) but no body can be unrivaled. ReplyVote 0
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 06:58
Ataturk was socio capito revolutionary, this is good and in fact Ataturk was very good man for Turkish people because Ataturk reunited a dispersed society, but he liquidated some republic voluteers who they did the war of liberation together and they founded the republic together and they found party Progressive Republican Party but Ataturk closed other parties two times and he hanged them. And also yahya captain , executioner of Ataturk killed Mustafa Suphi. and more Ataturk hanged some people who did not want to wear hat ! ReplyVote 0
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 07:11
Ataturk hanged how many people - rival revolutionaries and people who did not want to wear hat .....
Yahya Kahya killed Mustafa Suphi by direction of Turkish government
+
Zilan massacre
+
Dersim genocide
Don't be blind when you defend him, Defend Ataturk by knowing his good and bad sides
Hoffaa. Hoffaa. You only make the search for bad things, and how many of those things are bad if you compare it to time is very debateable. Yes, he hanged people. That was the right call for a country that just went through a world war, a revolution war and after that changing whole culture from 0. Maybe not the good choice for humanity but right choice overall. About the closing parties, you don't get that those parties were founded thanks to Ataturk in the first place, people who founded those parties were Ataturk's friends already. When those political parties started to threathen Turkey Republic, they needed to go. Don't be blind, I agree. But don't comment on stuff that you don't know shit and just got it from a random website ReplyVote 0 Day 3,315, 07:19
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 07:34
genocide for goodness, don't make me laugh
my article in israel
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/hitlerwasfunofataturk-2624173/1/20#comments
_____________________________________________________________
My Serbian Comrades What do you think of this, please comment
What is told in the book called 'Hitler was a fan of Ataturk'?
01/12/2014 15:42
PrintPocketPinterestGoogle + TumblrWhatsAppTwitterTelegramFacebook400
Hitler was a fan of
Adolf Hitler was deeply fun of Ataturk
Early in his career, Adolf Hitler took inspiration from Benito Mussolini, his senior colleague in fascism—this fact is widely known. But an equally important role model for Hitler and the Nazis has been almost entirely neglecte
😛Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, the founder of modern Turkey. Stefan Ihrig’s compelling presentation of this untold story promises to rewrite our understanding of the roots of Nazi ideology and strategy.
Hitler was deeply interested in Turkish affairs after 1919. He not only admired but also sought to imitate Atatürk’s radical construction of a new nation from the ashes of defeat in World War I. Hitler and the Nazis watched closely as Atatürk defied the Western powers to seize government, and they modeled the Munich Putsch to a large degree on Atatürk’s rebellion in Ankara. Hitler later remarked that in the political aftermath of the Great War, Atatürk was his master, he and Mussolini his students.
This was no fading fascination. As the Nazis struggled through the 1920s, Atatürk remained Hitler’s “star in the darkness,” his inspiration for remaking Germany along nationalist, secular, totalitarian, and ethnically exclusive lines. Nor did it escape Hitler’s notice how ruthlessly Turkish governments had dealt with Armenian and Greek minorities, whom influential Nazis directly compared with German Jews. The New Turkey, or at least those aspects of it that the Nazis chose to see, became a model for Hitler’s plans and dreams in the years leading up to the invasion of Poland.
i wrote this article in israel
commented there
Vlad Gordin 69 Vlad Gordin Day 3,314, 09:55
Report Don't mix RL and the game ReplyVote 0
Krimpie 170 Krimpie Day 3,314, 11:08
A very interesting read, wil vote and endorse it if you can explain wtf it has to do with erep. ReplyVote 0
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 03:02
I was believing Ataturk when i was teenager, and i met and work and fight in revolutionary front when i was 20 - 22 in Istanbul. At that ages Istanbul has hundred thousands revolutionary comrades. My experiences and observations shows me Ataturk was revolutionary if i compare Ataturk to Ottoman Sultanate. But when I compare it with the 20th century's reality, it was not as liberal for the people of Ataturk. Ataturk did good revolutions but he did not allow more contemporary revolutions. Turkey had 2 times democracy trial was canceled by ataturk, the parties were closed and the one under the control of the closing parties arrested the former comrades they had built together together with the republican war and blamed for homeland treachery but they were released because they did not have crimes but they were taken away from the authorities of the country.
By the way Ataturk is good revolutionary despite Hitler.
I mean Hitler was fun of Ataturk's conservative revolutionary.
I would like to say here that I like Atatürk's revolutionism, but I am angry because Ataturk prevented revolutioniary to improve turkish revolutions.
Ataturk prevented not only TKP revolutionaries, but also Ataturk prevented Bourgeois revolutionaries too.
Ataturk wanted to be sole supreme leader.
Hitler took this example of Ataturk's feature. ReplyVote 0
Hoffaa. Hoffaa. You should search better before making comments like these. Ataturk in fact, is the founder of the other political parties also. He helped a lot with founding of other parties. And yeah, he had to close them later on because those parties were aiming to hurt the Newly Founded country, not help it develop further. Now let me give you an example, Tell me, how many political parties existed in Serbia parliament to this day that supported Kosovo to be found? Around 1 or 2 . ReplyVote 0 Day 3,315, 05:10
XenonZen
why a fascist focused a social revolutionary? on what direction did Hitler take Ataturk as an example? Vote 0 Day 3,315, 05:19
Hoffaa. Hoffaa. If you are talking about Ataturk's way, it was never fascist focused nor anything close to fascist thought. Hitler took example from how Ataturk made a country with nothing a very strong country with his principles and economic opinions. Vote 0 Day 3,315, 05:26
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 06:16
Hoffaa, Ataturk was not fascist but he has secter style that he wasted his oponents. Yes ataturk was progressive but he liquidated his rivals.. Turks inspired him 'TEK ADAM' (unrivaled leader) but no body can be unrivaled. ReplyVote 0
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 06:58
Ataturk was socio capito revolutionary, this is good and in fact Ataturk was very good man for Turkish people because Ataturk reunited a dispersed society, but he liquidated some republic voluteers who they did the war of liberation together and they founded the republic together and they found party Progressive Republican Party but Ataturk closed other parties two times and he hanged them. And also yahya captain , executioner of Ataturk killed Mustafa Suphi. and more Ataturk hanged some people who did not want to wear hat ! ReplyVote 0
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 07:11
Ataturk hanged how many people - rival revolutionaries and people who did not want to wear hat .....
Yahya Kahya killed Mustafa Suphi by direction of Turkish government
+
Zilan massacre
+
Dersim genocide
Don't be blind when you defend him, Defend Ataturk by knowing his good and bad sides
Hoffaa. Hoffaa. You only make the search for bad things, and how many of those things are bad if you compare it to time is very debateable. Yes, he hanged people. That was the right call for a country that just went through a world war, a revolution war and after that changing whole culture from 0. Maybe not the good choice for humanity but right choice overall. About the closing parties, you don't get that those parties were founded thanks to Ataturk in the first place, people who founded those parties were Ataturk's friends already. When those political parties started to threathen Turkey Republic, they needed to go. Don't be blind, I agree. But don't comment on stuff that you don't know shit and just got it from a random website ReplyVote 0 Day 3,315, 07:19
XenonZen 32 XenonZen Day 3,315, 07:34
genocide for goodness, don't make me laugh
🙂
my article in israel
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/hitlerwasfunofataturk-2624173/1/20#comments
_____________________________________________________________
My Serbian Comrades What do you think of this, please comment
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments