ePH-eUSA Economic Comparison for Selected Industries, Day 1,199
PigInZen
I've decided to start publishing some economic analysis articles again, except this time I will be comparing economic conditions in the ePhilippines with those in the eUSA. I think the series will be somewhat enlightening and educational for those interested in how the economy of a smaller nation functions and what challenges small economies face when compared with their larger cousins. Let me point out that I will be approaching this from my personal perspective and will not be analyzing the both countries' markets in entirety. I am a niche producer and make Q5 food and weapons only in addition to the raw materials needed to supply those companies. I also own a stone company which is currently still producing stone but that product is subject to serious lack of demand in small nations, so while I will use it for comparison if it is an outlier from the other data it will be discarded.
One thing I've noticed off the bat: in real gold terms prices in the ePhilippines are higher. Much higher, much higher than can be accounted for by straight extrapolation via the production formula. The economy of a big nation like the eUSA has many advantages over a smaller nation such as a faster market and much larger aggregate demand. In addition to this basic market advantage the eUSA has higher bonuses towards production due to owning more resources.
Resource Comparison - A Breakdown
Of the ten resources the ePhilippines currently has access to only two: Fish and Oil. Because neither Grain nor Iron are present raw materials production doesn't receive the 25% bonus. Likewise food and weapons manufacturing receive only 5% of the potential 25% bonus because only one resource is available in each category: Fish for food and Oil for weapons.
The eUSA, in contrast, is fortunate to have bountiful resources. Grain and Iron production both receive the 25% production bonus due to the eUSA owning territory containing each resource. In addition the USA has eight of the ten resources lacking only deer and rubber and gains a 20% bonus for both food and weapons production.
How Resources Affect Production
I will use myself as an example. I'm a Guru**** and I have a basic productivity of 422 production points per work cycle. Because of the dearth of resources in the ePhilippines my production breaks down thusly:
Whereas if I still resided in the USA my production would look like this:
I've calculated the difference in percent based on the values for production in the ePhilippines and in the eUSA. The following table shows the ePhilippines production percentage if the USA production is equal to one:
To explain, for every 100 units of grain or iron produced in the USA we can produce 85 here. For every 100 units of food and weapons we can produce almost 91 here. We're less efficient, it's simply a fact. This difference in production should account for a slight increase in price for grain, iron, Q5 food and Q5 weapons in the ePhilippines compared to the eUSA but not as much as we currently have:
Notice that we're currently CHEAPER than the eUSA for grain in gold terms (HUZZAH!) but that we're woefully overpriced by almost 14% for iron and severly overpriced for Q5 weapons (32
😵and Q5 food (over double the price).
Here's What I'm Going to Do About This
I feel pretty strongly about trying to remain competitive price-wise with larger economies like the eUSA so... I've thought a bit about this and have decided to provide product for sale at a price in parity with those found in the eUSA. Yes, this means I will be selling iron and grain for 0.09 PHP per unit, Q5 food for 5.69 PHP and Q5 weapons for 54.03 PHP. I will eat the cost of the production deficit that I outlined above. I don't expect that company owners will be thrilled by this but those that need grain and iron for production as well as those that purchase high end niche food and weapons products will be. As always, feel free to send me your nastygrams and comments.
Why would I do this? It's simple. Right now I do not employee anyone and simply work for myself as owner in all of my companies. My cost of production is so low that I can still turn a nice tidy profit even at these prices. A serious profit, actually but that's a subject for my next issue of these economic articles in which I will point out the economic value in owning companies and working in them as and owner...
Until then let me close with this:
Maka-Diyos, Maka-Tao, Makakalikasan at Makabansa
For the Love of God, People, Nature and Country!
Comments
Pigmax!
Sneaky Paul gets first
Not first, Paul.
Nice try tho'
Shoot, I hate how slow my computer is 🙁
Not so Sneaky Paul fails at getting first, but at least he read the article, THATS WHAT COUNTS, WHATS ON THE INSIDE...Okay, I shutup now
I doubt either of you read this tl;dr economic nerdfest. LOL. w/e I still like commenters.
I did read it 🙁 🙁 :
Understand it? Maybe not xD
Good read, I like the comparison between the economies. The numbers are pretty easy to comprehend and you laid them out well. It definitely shows that having access to a large number of resources is a huge boon to any country and that fighting or trading for resources is in the best interest of any nation.
This game needs more economic articles.
Nice info, thanks.
eUSa is bigger :/.
Voted
Hey, I read this 😃 Great stuff!
Good luck lowering prices, great initiative ; )
I like this. Very much, i may even join you in this lowering the market 😉
Wow, superb article as always. Lack of 25% bonus on grain is especially dramatic. Voted hard.
SABAH !!
Good read.
Hey Pig,
I'd prefer to see analysis of Q1 food which is probably more accurate. The lack of competition at the higher quality levels causes an increases in prices beyond that caused by production costs causing the dramatic increase. A better comparison would be Q1 or Q3 which is just as useful as Q5 in general and I would expect be more evenly priced.
I was tempted to run some stats on this data, but then I realized two things.
A, the current economy is very deterministic, that is there is little unknown that can be tested by stats.
B, it's great data that shows obvious disparity, but it's one days worth of data which makes comparison impossible 🙂.
I'm tending to agree more with your approach to fixing the economy than hekter's...maybe it's the american in me 😛
One thing that I can mention to this beautiful article is that, based on your production numbers, we should expect 17% higher prices based off of production costs compared to the eUSA for iron/grain, while in comparison to food it should be about only 9.9% increase in prices.
I just inverted your computations 🙂
Also, do realize you are taking the lowest side of the confidence interval of predicted prices based on production alone (I'm too lazy perhaps, but a study of relative buying power of the individual is in order, only then would we really know if we are 'paying too much' domestically and this should the basis of prices...if we get 'buying power' based on wages/taxes the same as the eUSA, then we're overpaying, if we get less, we're REALLY overpaying)
Aren, you are outnerding me. Stop it. LOL. Seriously, though, I would love to do some substantive analysis of the ePH economy using the eUSA as a baseline. It's a good benchmark since the eUSA economy is very stable and not subject to wild swings, generally.
I think that a tax study could be useful too. There are lessons here for both sides.
Good read. This should be a fun fun stuff to be discussed in forums.
The United States of America is a great country. Please dont use propaganda against it.
Q5 food isn't really a good comparison, because all of the Q5 food available here is imported, and subject to a 99% import tax 😛 The highest most domestic producers go is Q3 food.
Other than that, really good analysis. If you can stabilize the economy without using socialism, I'd be curious to see what happens 🙂
very nice!!
I enjoyed reading through this "nerdfest" lol. I think there is much to enjoy from having an economic discussion and determining the best course of action from it.
However, as Hekter sai😛 Q5 food is almost entirely imported, and subject to our high import tax, so a normal study is disproportionally skewed in some manner.
Then exclude the Q5 data, and see how it matches up then.
@Aren
You're out-nerding me too, but what would the higher side CI look like?
Can I also see your calc for the 17% expected higher costs? I think that's like 1 or 2% too high.
Great article! Nice to see an article on the economy, given the interesting times we currently live in; I was under the impression that all everyone talks about is war - which is understandable given what's going on around us.🙂
But let's not forget its implications on our economy as well. There are threats and opportunities during war, so it's good that we are finding ways to adapt and maybe even flourish during these times.
By the way, @PiZ:
"Yes, this means I will be selling iron and grain for 0.09 PHP per unit, Q5 food for 5.69 PHP and Q5 weapons for 54.03 PHP." ==> I'm waiting for this...or is it gone already?😃
Nice analysis!
I hope we can find a way to really fix our economy.
bop check your pms 😃
SO.... ONE THING WE MUST DO
MINDANAO!!
Battle of the Economic Nerds
Pig vs Aren
Fight!!
Me and PiZ need not fight 🙂
I think we both prefer to work together! I know I do.
ePH the next RL Wisconsin?