[MoS] Rank the eWorld - Revised
MrConway
Minister of Community, Office of Census and Statistics
First off I'd like to apologize over the last Rank The eWorld survey. I am only new to the software I am using and made a bit of a hiccup with the survey. Thanks and apologies to those who actually took the time to fill in the survey. Anyway I've played around with the tool I use and have found an easier way for both you and me to record and analyze the data!
All you need to do is drag the countries you want an MPP with into the "Sign MPP" box and the countries you don't want an MPP with into the "Don't Sign MPP" box. You decide how many countries you want to put into each box, you can choose whatever countries you want, the power is in your hands!
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Anonymity:
In order to help prevent fraud and abuse, I require that all survey-takers provide a link to their eRepublik profile. Because I can personally see how you responded to specific questions if I really wanted to, this means that responses to this survey are not technically anonymous. I do, however, guarantee that such identifying information will never be seen by anybody but myself. I will never publicize or share anybody’s participation in this survey, much less their answers to specific questions. If I enlist someone’s help in analyzing data, they will only ever see data that has been purged of personally-identifying information. Thus, it is my hope that survey-takers feel comfortable in the knowledge that they will never be harassed regarding their participation in this survey, and that their answers will never be used against them politically.
Survey program:
Rather than using a simple Google form, this survey makes use of a more professional-quality survey program called Qualtrics. The advantages of this program are a more flexible user interface, better analytics, and, most importantly, better security and fraud prevention (see below). More information about the program can be found here.
Fraud Prevention
One important security feature of this program is that it does not allow anyone (including myself) to alter data that has already been collected. The only way to alter existing data is to delete or filter-out someone’s entire response set. However, because I now require people to provide a unique personal identification number (PIN) along with their profile links, survey-takers can be 100% certain that their responses were counted in full in any report by the software in which they can verify the presence of their PIN.
Participants can also be reasonably certain that results of these surveys are not influenced in other ways, such as adding fraudulent responses on top of legitimate data. The detection of multi votes can never be 100% accurate, but the vast majority of multi attempts can be detected using the fraud prevention tools that are imbedded within this software along with and a little common sense. For starters, the program collects metadata on things like IP addresses, screen resolution, and browser/flash/OS versions that I can (and do) check to make sure people aren’t taking this survey more than one time from the same computer. I also check to make sure that no two answer sets are suspiciously similar to one another, especially if one survey has been started within a minute or two of the other survey being finished. Profile links that are collected are thoroughly checked for suspicious properties, such as the use of duplicate profile links or profile links of dead citizens. Finally, verification checks are made via PM for a randomly-selected handful of profile links to ensure that people who took the survey actually are who they say they are. In the future I would also like to start cross-checking profile links with names of suspected Irish multi-accounts. If you have such a list, or know where to find one, please let me know ASAP. However, even without such a list, the tools and procedures outlined above already give me a significant degree of confidence in the validity of my data. If multi abuse exists at all it is extremely rare, and its final effect on results is negligible.
Thank you for in advance for taking this survey!
Minister of Community, Census and Statistics
MrConway
Some citizens may not be able to use the feature involved in this survey. The problem may be your browser. Try Google Chrome or another browser if experiencing difficulty.
Comments
Seriously?
It took me forever to do that first one
Danm you, Conway !
Anyway... boated
I'll do this one, too. /sigh
o7
mrconway do you think you should resign now that is has been proven that you were a part of the theft and not an after the fact accessory.
http://media10.dropshots.com/photos/629677/20121018/124132.jpg
also bhane i must agree now with kurgan 100% . he was apart of the theft not an accessory to it. your government will have no credibility if it continues with this minister a thief.
= v =
where is the result of the last survey then mrconway.
The previous "Rank the eWorld" survey has been disregarded. All citizens that took part have been messaged individually to inform them of the situation.
As for the general survey, all the statistics are in Moo's hands who is going to use software he possesses to create graphs that best suit the information obtained.
Hope this answers all your questions regarding the workings of the Ministry.
please release the results i didnt participate but would sure like the answers to some of the questions . did peek into it.
The one with all the questions will be released hopefully this weekend when Moo has time to do up the images.
eCanada \o/
I've done this one..
Voted for George Zimmer.
done o7
Nobody wants to retake this again. Why do you even exist? Go continue watching man on man hentai
done o7
done, but what's up with the PIN? We already have to ID ourselves and provide a link.
Stilpo used to do the same thing at one time. It helps verify that you aren't just using someone else's name and id.
if someone else had your name and password, they can't just put in 4 numbers? It just seems a bit redundant and unnecessary.
If someone puts your name and password twice, the idea is that they could send you a pm and ask you what your pin was. And if the pin you responded with matched one of the responses, they would know which one was really you.
Believe it or not people will actually pretend to be other citizens just to skew the results.