Did you do the math?
•
by Director9
Dear readers,
did you have a look at my 2 previous articles?
The first one depicted absolute numbers, the second percentages of those same numbers as they compared to the totals.
What conclusion might we draw from this :
1) that B's percentage rose at the cost of the numbers of A? No, B had a small decline in numbers, and A an even bigger decline, that's all
2) that A's sudden increase at the end was a result of B losing numbers to A? No, the increase in A did not come at the cost of B's population.
I can safely say, that bar 1 or 2, there was no transfer between A and B population, the growth came from outside.
Now why this boring stuff? The game's properly screwed at the moment and I had nothing better to do.
With the same facts, I can present a particular view, draw my own conclusions to fit my own narrative. Don't be deceived by the presentation of facts, look at the numbers(especially those left out), analyse and see if the conclusion the presenter draws fit ALL the facts.
So I give you a graph now, actual numbers, no percentages, you have seen this one in another form already somewhere else :
I'll leave it up to the reader to interpret these results, if there's anything to interpret of course.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
Ah, but we DID grow the population, and every person we brought in was encouraged to join any party they wish. All you argument illustrates is that HOPE, not ATO grew the population of Belgium, and that the majority, not everyone, joined HOPE because when it comes to parties, HOPE is where it is at.
Our Minister of Education came to our shores because of a HOPE initiative. You are making a fool of yourself because the figures I presented don't even mention population, voter turn-out or how many people voted for each party. It presents ONLY the percentage of votes that went to each party, and what it shows is simple. When HOPE beat you, after your own party impeached you, you guys reacted by running a coup.
If your graph is showing population voting, then it proves beyond a reasonable doubt that HOPE grew not only our party, but yours as well. Just look between October and December. You can thank HOPE for that growth you guys got.
And by the way, it was better when you were CP and said ABSOLUTELY NOTHING fort 4 years, at least I don't get a brain aneurysm dealing with this stupidity.
IF YOU WANT GROWTH, HOPE IS THE ANSWER, IF YOU WANT FAIR GOVERNMENT, HOPE IS THE ANSWER
A VOTE FOR HOPE IS A VOTE AGAINST THIS IDIOCY
"....at least I don't get a brain aneurysm..."
one thing I know you should never worry about
So you are telling me that I don't have a brain. I note your supercilious attitude. There is a old saying "Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones", which is a really old European proverb. Right above is your article (the glass house). Be careful talking about other peoples brains when your present this dribble.
I have never hidden the fact I don't have a brain, or pretend to have one : I am a packplayer, I'm still playing eRepublik is proof enough.
You package your same meaningless dribble in fancy artwork and words for only one audience, and not many of them were eager to participate in your media competition it seems.
So please, stop pretending your some great savior and are here to rescue eBe from the clutches of some virtual evil. You are here to be in control because that's all there's left in this game if your not some powerhouse on the battlefield or in the economy. And I don't mind that, it's the game.
I am not looking for power, that is in ATO's hands. We do not have the power to remove you through military, but all I can do is ask people to vote for me (and yes, if I win I will be impeached) and let that be a message to your party that your antics have to end.
I am sorry about the fuel, it seems to have you really bummed. You do have a brain buddy, or you would not be able to breath. Size is another story all together.
V.
Ups, I made a small mistake.
No worries, made one 10 years ago.
But the big question is, what does this article actually prove. If this is their smoking gun, they do not deserve to lead