A Call for Calm
10 Downing Street
Fellow citizens
In the last 48 hours we saw some extraordinary scenes in the Congress thread and Country feed stemming from a disputed election for Speaker of Congress. The dispute escalated throughout the next day. Now that everyone has had the chance to sleep on things, I am calling for calm and a restoration of dignified proceedings in Congress and elsewhere.
I am not blameless in this myself, as I muddied the waters in the Congress discussions about the closing time for the Speaker vote. I also drafted this article yesterday and perhaps should have published it immediately, instead of hoping that things would simply settle.
No matter what was said before or since, one of the candidates for the position conceded the election at one point and as Country President, I acted on that and acknowledged it, congratulating Mr Woldy on his election and formally communicating with him in keeping with my earlier commitment to do so.
Following this, things got rather confused and intemperate in the Congress thread, for reasons not entirely clear to all observers.
As Country President, I vote in-game on Congress law proposals and the same should apply in Congress votes on issues that are to be subsequently resolved by in-game voting. I now accept that this does not extend to purely internal questions in Congress, such as its internal appointments.
With regard to the appointment of a Speaker, it is my opinion that this should be decided as the first act of any new Congress, with the outgoing Speaker in charge of the proceedings, specifying the voting process and precise closing time for the vote. However, formulating this process is a matter to be decided by Congress alone.
In the circumstances, I recommend that the be no further change or action until a new election is called under procedures to be decided by Congress.
I also call upon all parties in Congress, whether supporters of the elected Speaker, or members and supporters of the government, to terminate the existing disputation and focus on matters of national importance.
We must remember that one party, or opponents of a party, do not represent the national polity on their own account. It is the same with the non-political elements of our community, such as the strong military players and the large business owners. Each of them contribute to the national welfare; the fighters militarily and the business owners economically. All politically active players also contribute to the national good with their participation in the political module. All military and business activity generates tax revenue for the country, to be distributed by those in the political module who provide the leadership and decision-making without which nothing could be managed. It must also be remembered that our national tanks cooperate with other citizens by their forbearance in the medal runs that are protected and rewarded by government programs for less powerful players.
Thank you for your time.
wingfield
Country President
Comments
Do you abide by your vice presidents behaviour, language and treatment towards myself, you have seen the screenshot and I can make it public if needs be.
Read the article again
I also call upon all parties in Congress, whether supporters of the elected Speaker, or members and supporters of the government, to terminate the existing disputation and focus on matters of national importance.
None of this answers my question. I refuse to call off any dispute because he’s not sorry. And if this is your stance then you clearly accept his behaviour.
I have previously stated that I do not recognise Discord. Neither am I going to concede in any way to your unseemly baying for blood
Your vice president is bullying people off game and a refusal to acknowledge that is an acceptance of the behaviour.
Just so we are clear,
if a player harasses bullies and hounds other players repeatedly you are fine with that as long as it doesn’t happen ‘in game’ and you would actually be happy for them to be your second in command, deputising and representing you and your govt?
"I have previously stated that I do not recognise Discord"
So? No matter if it's directly in-game or not, the intent and behaviour was the same.SHA was acting as SHA, his eRepublik "persona".
It's not like we're bringing a non-related RL argument into it.
It's comical at this point that people keep giving Appleby government positions, you know exactly what you are going to get, a drunken rant or something bizarre like this - either way, he's almost certain to go off the rails and you're going to have to either fire him or accept he makes your government look nuttier than one of those biscuits in Woldy's competition.
Why did you even want the vCP to be Speaker?
Why have a speaker in the first place?
If the game needed a speaker there would already be a button for congress to vote on. and game mechanics would handle timings.
Although I agree that official channels with Congress, Parties etc should remain ingame, I disagree that the activities of people in Gov or Congress on other channels isn't anyone's problem. Whether we like it or not, forums, telegram, whatsapp, discord, email etc have all been used for Gov activities over time. People have associated via social media in sunnier times when they were happy to do so.
As a result those players who have been here for years have ways of communicating off site, including via phone numbers, personal contact info etc. For someone, years on from having that info for game purposes, then uses it to harass people is not only vile behaviour but a breach of trust and of peoples privacy. Logging out of erep is not enough to avoid SHA's behaviour. As much as we might prefer that it was, that box has been opened and he has ways of contacting people and is using it to harass people. At the very least that should be condemned and yes, absolutely should reflect the degree to which people stomach him being in congress or government. I think he should be kicked out of both for repeatedly bullying people but it isn't up to me. He being in gov, respective of how he is treating people, is up to you though.
Surely discord has its own support to report any sutch things?
Yeah but it's not fast or thorough and it's easy to get around. Telegram is even worse.
It's also not really the point, there should be consequences for peoples actions and character (or lack of). We shouldn't just suggest to people they should deal with it and hope discord does something. This is a community at the end of the day.
Cannot comment on Discord but have seen some foul language thrown by multiple people.
A settlement period is required currently.
v + c
Rory is spot on. The only surprise about this latest Appleby car crash is that it took so long.
What is this hold that Appleby has over governments that feel they must keep him on board?
It really shouldn’t be a question of he’s doing it outside of erepublik so it’s ok, the question should be why he’s doing it at all
You’re putting the onus on the victim and essentially victim blaming. “Block him” rather then punishing the action itself
How can everyone be so aggressive at an article called "A Call for Calm"?
all your comments seem ironic considering your here attacking him instead of just "Blocking him"
Attacking? Hardly.
We're being told to "put up or shut up" but it's ok for him to get pissed and challenge us?
yes, if he also admitted fault and feels a need to use that language with people in order to restore peace and function in the government
Lol the hypocrisy.
Instead of dealing with the *actual* bullying, he'll just get angry at those calling it out.
He hasn’t admitted fault though