[SFPOM] Principles of Fascism and The People's Response III
Max Tse Tung
MUSIC
Before I begin I would like to say that Corporatism is not exclusively a Fascist theory and that there are many different forms of Corporatism. However, there is a form of Corporatism that is exclusively Fascist and that is what I will be discussing today. I’ll include multiple examples and quotes from leading figures of the movements to help flesh out some of the ideas within Corporate Fascism. So without further ado let us begin.
Remember Oswald Mosley from the previous article? He had some things to say on the topic, stating: "it means a nation organized as the human body, with each organ performing its individual function but working in harmony with the whole"
There was also another analogy used to describe the ideology more generally that also applies to the ideas behind corporate fascism -though I would suggest it is a sort of political paradox along with the latter analogy- That being the iconic Fasces or the bundle of rods with an axe tied to them. Strength through unity.
The claimed foundations for Corporate Fascism are the unification of trade unionism and corporatism with the state in an attempt to give workers, unions, and corporations formal mechanisms of control through the state. In practice, this process would be corrupted by the interests of the head of the state who would be a dictator and by the ruling fascist party. This process also entailed the destruction of many unions and their ability to negotiate with employers and their ability to use direct action, protests, and strikes. It also took power out of the hands of the bourgeoisie and capitalist class as their interests and business plans could be suppressed by the state.
Fascist Corporatism is a “top down” model which means that the economy is controlled by the state to an authoritarian extent and it involved nationalization of industry especially in arms manufacturing, automobile manufacturing, utilities, and infrastructure development. A common slogan amongst Italian Fascists before and during the Second World War was: "Tutto nello Stato, niente al di fuori dello Stato, nulla contro lo Stato" ("everything for the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state")
Fascists during the Second World War were itching for endorsements from the Roman Catholic Church for their policies toward Corporatism, even when the church supported a “bottom up” model whereby families and professionals would work together under a voluntary system. The Fascist Corporate model of Roman Catholic Italy influenced heavily the economies of Roman Catholic countries and Non-Roman Catholic countries alike and was supported by Austria, Estonia, Latvia, and Portugal. It was also supported by fascist parties in Non-Roman Catholic countries such as the British Union Of Fascists.
In Portugal, a neutral country during the Second World War, The prime minister of Portugal, (Salazar) in 1933 who was responsible for the Estado Novo -an authoritarian corporatist government that ruled until 1974- said : "Our Dictatorship clearly resembles a fascist dictatorship in the reinforcement of authority, in the war declared against certain principles of democracy, in its accentuated nationalist character, in its preoccupation of social order. However, it differs from it in its process of renovation. The fascist dictatorship tends towards a pagan Caesarism, towards a state that knows no limits of a legal or moral order, which marches towards its goal without meeting complications or obstacles. The Portuguese New State, on the contrary, cannot avoid, not think of avoiding, certain limits of a moral order which it may consider indispensable to maintain in its favour of its reforming action” Portugal’s Corporatism was considered a form of Catholic Corporatism and though influenced by Mussolini and the Italian fascists it was not associated with them.
We will now discuss the influence of Fascist Corporatism in South America and the ways in which foreign corporations have undue influence and power over regions they can exploit with the consent of their host nation. We will also discuss the ways in which Fascism and Corporate Power have been entangled on the continent over the decades. But before we begin we will need some background as to how Fascism came about and functioned in South America.
In the 1920s, in Argentina, Leopoldo Lugones (initially a socialist) became sympathetic to and then later became a Fascist. This caused a variety of Fascist intellectuals to begin writing in the journal La Nueva Republica. These writers espoused ideas similar to that of Charles Maurras who was a Monarchist, Anti-Semitic, Anti-Parlimentarian, and Counter-Revolutionary. Charles Maurras was a major influencer of National Catholicism and supporter of Corporatism. He stated : "a true nationalist places his country above everything.”
These writers formed the group called ADUNA (Afirmación de Una Nueva Argentina) this group worked with the regime of José Félix Uriburu to introduce Fascist Corporatism inspired by Benito Mussolini but ultimately failed, deciding instead to begin the Infamous Decade.
The Infamous Decade was a period between 1930 and 1942. It began with the overthrow of President Hipólito Yrigoyen in a coup d'etat by José Félix Uriburu and resulted in Juan Perón’s rise to power after the military coup of 1943 where he became the minister of labor and then later president of Argentina in 1946. The decade was froth with Repression of political opposition, electoral fraud, and the effects of the Great Depression and was the beginning of the populist political movement called Peronism.
Peronism was a vague blend of Nationalism, Unionism, and Populism. It was notorious for silencing the opposition by claiming they were unpatriotic and was derided by many socialists as continuing class exploitation and class division through its corporatist policy. It was also opposed by conservative and liberal figures alike.
To be continued…
I want to hear from my readers on this, what aspects of Fascism do you think should be covered in this series? Let me know!
Comments
[SFPOM] Principles of Fascism and The People’s Response
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2713209
V+C+S+S
Really interesting, thanks! S120
Thanks for reading!
Thank you.
I’ll include links and pictures when I can
I've been following (your very interesting) series, but this ep. is a bit plum with disparate research. Perhaps you could have make it a two parter? A Fascist Corpocracy in and of itself is a paradox. Corpocracies cannot convene without international trade cooperation, dispelling the primary "Fascist" element of ultra Nationalism by proxy. As for Peronism, that was sheer populism at it's zenith and it would be a far stretch to label it as either a Fascist or Corporate movement; it's too nuanced to wrap with the one rope.
Still though, very cool to see political thought just for the sake of political thought posted up here on eRep.
Looking forward to reading new content! 🙂
o7
"Corporatism" doesn't mean what many people today think it means -- control of a nation by large commercial entities. It means control of a nation by an interest group, or interest groups.
Interesting point. Not sure the same kind of corporate fascism Max described historically could exist in the modern world, now that the power of corporations has in many ways exceeded that of states. It will be interesting to see how folks analyze the morphing of "happy" (technocratic, "democratic") neo-liberalism into an authoritarian, neo-fascist form. (See, for example, Dardon & Laval's "Never-Ending Night-mare", Verso, 2019)
"Corporations are people, my friend" -- the great Mitt Romney. Sorry, couldn't resist.
But I'm only half-joking. The problem isn't the corporations themselves, but the concentration of wealth. I'd have few problems with a corporatocracy if the corporations weren't all owned by a handful of people.
There will definitely be another part to this subject in the series. Thanks for reading 🙂
Hitler had a wonderful economy.
smh lol
😃
o7
V!
Interesting read. Not unity is strength but diversity is when you can have open discussions without violence. Without diversity new ideas will be silenced and isolated societies will fall behind. I think that is why fascist regimes do end naturally.
Definitely agree, not only do they oppress their own people but they suppress their ideas, that kind of environment can only be stable for so long before the people respond. 🙂 thanks for reading
It's really funny when under the flag of virtual "The SOCIALIST Freedom party" there is a articles about NATOINAL SOCIALIST parties back in the World War II.
All kinds of "socialism" are very bad ... and ugly ... and if they get elected they ruined everything....
So a little advice - start to listen this guy - Jordan Peterson ... and stop this "socialism" bullshit:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lTGu35BpZs
Do you also believe that buffalo wings are made from buffalo?
Lmao so I can look at pseudoscientific diagrams about self help? I’ll pass. If you don’t like what I write don’t read it.
[removed]
Jordan B Peterson - "I'm a Christian and a Marxist"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvmn1wLglak
Meh. He strikes me a vacuous conspiracy theorist popular with neo-Nazis and white supremacists, a stupid person's idea of a smart person. Taking him at his word, he defends an autarchal kind of classical liberalism, but with all kinds of mushy language about "post-modern neo Marxism" that seems to boil down to "Aaaargh! Damn that Gramsci!" (who was not a post-modernist, though you might say he was a precursor to Adorno). In other words, I don't find him convincing as a scholar.
[removed]
You really don't understand the slippery way people like Peterson -- and Bernie Sanders -- use and abuse the word "socialist." Bernie Sanders is not a socialist; he's a capitalist who uses the word "socialist" because he's one of those people who likes to stir up shit. Sweden is not a socialist country. Denmark is not a socialist country. Norway is not a socialist country. Those are the countries Sanders uses as his model, not the Eastern European shitholes people like you always talk about.
this is my biggest frustration in conversations abt social policy and socialism. people are reactionary lunatics and too easily triggered by scary words that sound like something that they used to know.
Jesus Christ the hysteria on this guy is unreal. @Harvester go seek help from an actual psychiatrist instead of YouTube videos on the Rubin Report or fake-woke Jorden Peterson.
One more observation before I call it a day. It’s really telling when I write articles about Fascism and some reactionary comes here to rant on and on about Socialism. Keep your damn masks on rightists. We don’t care about your true power level.
Nice article. Support from United Socialist Party! o/
Thanks for reading! is USP apart of the eInternationale?
I declared my interest about eInternationale. If somebody connect with me. We will pleasure to join it
I'll let them know
deal!
Congratulations for the article.
o7