Join the new world

NEVER HE MUST SUFFER ETERNALLY
BLABLABLABLABLA
TROLLTROLLTROLL

Should the accused be granted full citizenship? Should his crimes be forgotten?

NO

The poll question is, should the Ministry of Justice prosecute Samuel de Champlain Yes/No.

JE M'ABSTIENS

JE M'ABSTIENS

YESSSS

YES

Prosecute: Yes
Citizenship: No

YES

YES

holy crap saintconnor took the pimps avatar

Yes, after reading the findings of the minister of Justice, it is clear that finally a reasonable and lawful conclusion has been found, especially considering no formal charges were ever laid and the defendant suffered long term exclussion due to rumour and allegation. The findings are what they are, and they are final, while I have said my yes for the poll, I find that this poll is unnecessary and redundant.

i believe so

no jb, he borrowed it from me without him knowing it

but i forgave him 😛

IMPEACH!

Impeachment is silly and that's not what we're discussing. So let's end that talk right now.

Ah yes, and now we get to the best kind of justice... MOB JUSTICE! Torches and pitchforks, ho!

Schmucks.

Better yet, who the f&%$ cares?

Aye

@Dismortis

This is not mob justice. This is simply a public call to action which is far different. No pitchforks...this poll simply states whether or not the public supports a trial.

As far as I can see, he's been through the legal system already. The issue is there's a mob who don't like the result. No worries though, clearly you're ready to keep prosecuting him until you get the result you want.

Frankly, I find the argument that swapping to French citizenship absolves him of his actions to be a feeble one at best. However, he's had his day in court. If you feel the court is in error, take the matter to a higher court. (Protip: The Court of Public Opinion is NOT a higher court, you Limbaugh-wannabes.)

prosecute SdC: NO
Citizenship: NO
Prosecute Ozzy:YES!!!

Dismortis...the issue is there has been no trial, just a flurry of PM's with our dear President as the sole arbiter of its outcome.

That is the issue. If you had read the articles I posted you would know this much.

If the accepted, written course of justice in eCanada has been perverted then you need to be thumping on the president and any other legal entities involved. Any corruption in the legal system would need to be address previous to taking another run at Slappy de Champlain.

If the private arbitration is an accepted legal event, then suck it up and put your witch hunt back in the dark ages where it belongs. Hell, just use the resources at your disposal (likely in the form of congressional parachute-voters and candidates) to ensure he never sees the inside of congress.

Common Gaius, this things happend 250 days ago.
At a certain point, until when would you like to talk about it.
I think its time to move on to something else and get prepared for a powerful eCanada in V2.

Dismortis is just a loser a$$hole Gaius, ignore him \o/ All he posts is insults and trolling comments.

This is a game. Why do we even have courts? Just kick him out of the forums.


@ "blah blah blah" no one gives a shiznit little man 🙂

AYE. A thousand times AYE.

Time doesn't absolve actions against the flag.

\o/

Trying for the media mogul, Caesar?

Si je comprend bien, une mob est présentement en train de se rebeller contre notre système judiciaire, contre l'exécutif même de notre bel eCanada?

Serait-ce... de la trahison?? \o

Should the accused be granted full citizenship? Should his crimes be forgotten?

Non pretinent depuis la dernière décision du procureur général.

I say Try Ozzel O'Dun, the man behind the citizenship of De Champlain

Do We Persecute - No.
Seems like the time to persecute any supposed wrongdoing is past.

Do We Offer Citizenship - Maybe.
Not if there's any perceived notion that the accused harbors hostility towards eCanada.

Shelveston, your vote doesn't count at the moment because it is unclear what you mean. Do you support prosecution against Samuel de Champlain? Yes or No.

Ralph: He already had faced a trial.

That's how unnecessary this pool is xD

Prosecute: Yes
Citizenship: No

As the dMoJ I should probably abstain from this vote, but I think you guys know my sentiment.

Caesar: Shelveston's answer is perfectly understandable and follows your own questions. Please consider that before invalidating a comment.
&quot😉o We Persecute - No.
Seems like the time to persecute any supposed wrongdoing is past."

Citizenship: Yes
Crime forgotten: Yes, if you consider that there is a crime. (The question is biased.)

@Spencer McCarthy:

Some would be angry at such a slanderous attack on one's good name. I however, am bigger than that, and forgive you your misdirected rage and your intellectual cowardice. Because what all this sound and fury comes down to are two separate issues rooted in cowardice, and one in anger.

The "angry reason" for all this is the accusation that Samuel committed treason against Canada. He has faced justice on the matter. If you do not approve of the decision of the court, then work to fix the court or abandon the pretext of justice outside of the game rules.

The first issue based on cowardice is the possibility that Samuel is the spearhead for a PTO attempt. As time passes this seems more and more unlikely. Frankly, if the UN had dreams of throwing a PTO they would have already started bringing in voters with the six congressmen they have. This angle is played out, and is a front to cling for those too craven to admit the real issue.

The real issue is the fact that since the UN cracked the top five, the established top five parties have been filling their respective diapers in terror. Here we have a group that is unified in a way your lot can never be, and anything goes in trying to keep them down. If Samuel hadn't popped up to be your punchbag you'd would have had to invent him.

Of course, while this goes on the xenophobes slander the UN and accuse them of treason, based on one member being somewhere on the scale between fool and traitor. I for one instead choose embrace all our Quebecois brethren. In the end we are all Canadians, even the ones who threaten to take your congressional seat.

OUI

+1000² Dismortis.

French eCanadians are often accused of "dividing the nation", but when you look at so close-minded comment as we can see on that article, I can see that we're not the dividing ones...

Yes

OUI.

Mr. Shameplain CHOSE to desert.
The eCanadian taxpayers should have had a CHOICE as to whether or not to subsidize his ( and others of his ilk) return.

to clarify;
I vote No.

@ M.Loiselle

It's funny that you think only the comments supporting one side of the issue are 'close minded'.

The issue itself is divisive. The government should have been proactive on this one.

SEND HIM TO THE GALLOWS KIDDING
YEA

Yes he should mother sucker.

Il est intéressant de constater la mauvaise volonté de certain.
Chose qu'on ne peut me reproché après avoir parcouru volontairement les procédures menant à la libération des accusations portés à mon encontre. Si tout les agitateurs que vous êtes serait venu me demander mes intentions, il m'aurait fait plaisir de vous répondre. Mais aucun n'apprécie réellement voir que je représente toutes les contradictions qui anime le débat linguistiques dans notre pays. Et que je représente un pilier des valeurs et de la spécificité de la Nation québécoise. Il me semble qu'ils vous manque réellement de discernement en ce qui a trait à la liberté d'entreprise, la liberté d'expression et le respect de la culture de l'autre.

Culture should have nothing to do with it Shameplain. If earth were being attacked by aliens who spoke what you folks call french, would you switch sides and fight for the destruction of earth?

Never mind, you probably would.

Forgot to vote to this travesty.

No he should not be tried, because you can't put a man on trial based on laws that weren't in application when the fault was commited.

There's a reason why there wasn't any trial, but that's too much to understand for some people.