Here Be Dragons
Day 3,099, 15:27
•
Published in Australia 
•
by
•
by J Seemore
Yesterday we were witnessing the strange behavior of former APP member known as Stojke. He proposed two laws about minimum wage and work tax then he left the party and changed his name to Legendary Viking Dragon.
Stojke was very quiet last 10 days and I noticed that he didn't gain experience points for working and training which is unusual for him. As a head of ASIO team I messaged him about one CS request.
No action, no reply from Stojke ... Instead he decided to make some mess. Why? The only rational explanation could be changing the owner of this account. But that is illegal according to game rules:
You may not: (i) enter, select or use an email address owned or controlled by another person with the intent to impersonate that person, or, (ii) use a name without appropriate authorisation, iii) permit others to use your account, iv) sell, trade, or otherwise transfer your erepublik account to another party, v) use other Users’ accounts, vi) charge anyone for access to any portion of www.erepublik.com, or any information therein.
My duty was to write a ticket to admins for checking this account and to inform others in order to reduce the damage. I did that. In the congress thread I recommended writing tickets to admins, I messaged admins together with at least two fellow party members and I informed the rest of the party that the dragon is not our friend anymore. I did that before Rusty's article
I think I did the necessary in this case and feel that such accusations from Party President of other party is completely unacceptable. If something more should be done by me or by the party president then feel free to share your thoughts below.
Yours:
J Seemore
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
I can only confirm that before I understand anything JS call for report in APP thread. And no one here know something about his law proposal. There's strange people in any place. 😛
Maybe, who can tell. Everything seemed on the up and up until he went missing. He was a bit upset when I questioned his choice to let in someone unapproved and offered to resign. After accessing the situation I told him I didn't think the situation required that extreme and he went back to work. You'd have to ask gudz about this month. :/
*assessing
The new username is a similar name to his newspaper. I think it more likely that he got tired of all those angry supposed hippies beating up on the border farce, trying to stop them from doing their important job of protecting us from our prejudices of people from the eMiddle East.
Gudz, I know this is a game, but I find that pretty racist.
You didn't read it right, it's a commentary on racism. "Protect us from our prejudices."
IRL protests you're not likely to find me to be the one high five-ing a cop in a "split second action in a dynamic environment." I'm more likely to be on the other side.
Thank you for clarifying.
and sorry for mis-reading.
In a real life protest you will prob see me sitting in a bar near by enjoying a cold beer.... protests are not really approved here
I would like to see the accusation you are talking about
" I think I did the necessary in this case and feel that such accusations from Party President of other party is completely unacceptable"
What have I accused you of? Please explain that to me...
As you would of seen, my reference to a PTO is talking about paid party members and the risks involved. Plus the fact every party is at risk of rogue congree members. This is something that has been seen many times before, both the rogue and the PTO element. I am merely rasing the point that if people are paid to go to a party, the chances increase for a PTO.
But if you want to take one line out of a full article, be my guest, it helps you twist things to your own way.
So you say the Dragon get paid for being APP member. That is ridiculous!
+ Everyone who wants to get 5 gold extra may choose a party and apply for congress. It is almost guaranteed he will take the medal for being only 3 days in that party, then why should he stay one month for taking 3 gold? But I see you like to twist the things to keep going.
Where did I say Dragon was a paid APP member?
You do see the big line break in the article, the second subject heading about another topic.
If you actually read the article (I do realise English is a second language so some confusion could be here), you would see that I took about the fact many parties are going toward payments for members to join. I speak about how it could lead to a potential PTO (by change of leadership etc), about the fact it could lead to disarray in parliament by rogue actions/laws. Then I used the rogue law by Dragon as an example of a rogue law.
So please tell me where I said Dragon was a paid member of the APP. And you talk about twisting...
Where is the link with Dragon's proposed laws and getting paid 3 gold for being 30 days party member?
I still dont know where your getting this paid member thing from... Your the one who keeps referring to him as a paid member.
So please show me where I said he was a paid member?
Whut, Why am I in this article? 😮 Im a legitimate person 😮 I think >.>
Uhm, you left eAus for a reason so you are not allowed back in :/
😮 *faints*