[CP-AUS] What's Currently Going On?
Aus Prime Minister Office
So we have been here now for a good week working hard to secure our country. But what is really happening right now?
Discussion with Peru
We had a discussion with Peru, based on what they wanted from this war. Evidently it is safe to say they want Tasmania but still wanted to call it a Training War. Discussion was stopped as it was no longer necessary to keep open, they want a training war, we don't.
A New Member of an Alliance
A month ago, during Hungary occupation our former friends decided to betray us, stabbing us in the back and help Hungary against us in their war. This made the previous government decide to join a good, stable better Alliance. We have succesfully applied for Adriatica, and we are now the new members of Adriatica. We thank Chile and all other member states for their great cooperation.
What needs to be done
We still need to continue liberating Australia, surrendering or giving in to Peru's attacks is not under any circumstances being permitted. If we get wiped, Peru will leave with more ground and more damage to handle Resistance Wars.
A Letter from the President to Congress
Our country is in flames, we are taking a decent amount of time in discussions of how to get our country to be liberated from Peru, and get it secured so that you guys will be able to either be in Congress or can feel proud that the country is a strong and powerful nation. I condemn the actions of certain parliament members who felt attacked and abused by us explaining things in an aggressive manner.
We are trying our best, it's hard when you are in conflict at times to focus on congress, but I will apologize on those terms that I will focus more on Parliament and allow them to know what's going on from today.
Australian President,
Bautista Diego Reyes.
Comments
o7
Training War mis cojones
Perú nos mintió. 😉
A nice one
Hi
Oh hey. 🙂
After reading inboxes... I am kinda happy that I am busy in RL. It's less stressful flying to a different city every three days
I can only imagine the unhappiness they are describing my term. I long for the days of being part of the opposition again, I work better that way anyway. But yeah, I expected this to happen anyway.
BDR as you imply, it is always easier to be in opposition than to lead - doesn't mean you shouldn't do it, nor that it is not appreciated.
You are doing fine - the one area though I would suggest needs to be addressed is activity and domestic though. Pretty much everyone here has been around to know even if we liberate from Peru this month, the cycle will continue in some shape or form, and occupation MTP/PTO or any range of similar things is down the track. So also try and think about plans for activity and harnessing what appears to be some folks either back or coming back. That's the loger term legacy you can leave for your run should you choose to pursue it.
Any discussion or ideas on such let me know and am happy to contribute thoughts.
RB
BDR whos your opposition besides Peru?
An option around investment: accept military and fighting is an established core to this game. But, investing in it may also contribute to community and building peeps.
Talk to Henry and others - while it is recycled concept, establish a scheme to create an elite unit of people you fully fund - base it on activity and coordinated hitting (eg, 10.people who are FULLY FUNDED so long as they all coordinate their hitting, so others can see an elite core Aus force hiring together in battles). Set entry requirements to give people something to aspire to to get into this group, based on activity, strength or whatever other criterion you set.
Have perhaps a second tier, or a development program for new bs based on less elite but perhaps similar criteria.
Either way the principle is if you create some solid unit of people all working together it gives people something to work towards and might encourage them to want to be a part of something because they see the coordinated and community approach towards it. While there are arguments for or against, given the low population at the moment a scattergun funding model across people of variable activity might mean a more solid base to grow from.
Als have similar ideas to economy. But I suppose that is for another day.
That community is so important. That's why I'm wanting to restart the crimson devils
Ranger, one of the issues with a tank corps is the supply of packs. A proper tank will have the power pack, blitz pack and maverick pack (D4) or infantry kit (D1-3). That costs 40 Euro a month, per tank. It takes a special person to spend so much on a game.
If you can buy the packs with CC (a vanishing prospect) then it will cost in the order of 500k CC a month. Per tank.
Then weapons, food and a full suite of houses. The houses will cost about 23k CC for a suite, which might last two weeks. All told, each fully funded tank could cost as much as 1 million CC a month.
Can eAustralia raise enough in tax for one? Probably not. Solid idea though.
So... What about private donations of packs, weapons, food etc? That can work, but the people donating have a tendency to want to influence and control the country as a result. No such thing as a no-strings donation here.
It might be possible to crank start a community of fighters (that is, get people to want to buy their own packs and self support). You need someone to lead the way. And you can't do it with new citizen accounts. Over 120k strength only, or it isn't worth it much.
Get at the moment there is a risk expenses would runneth over income income. At present, the treasury and financial position of Australia is good in terms of money in the kitty - refer to the DoF report. This would be both a risk, and expenditure. My honest view is even having this much in the bank, if the intent is to save it for major battles, the win is likely short term (ie we win but then get occupied later), or, no amount of money will help if we have a limited pool of fighters to spread it sound to (ie, 5 big hitters for us can't match 100 lower clickers). Therefore the sustainable investment is actually on supporting active population growth. More peeps = better chance of sustainable wins. Means more working, means more tax, means improved government revenue.
TL😉R Version - sometimes you have to spend money to make money.
Sounds like Ilene wants to get involved and can give some valuable input
Military strategy is important, but can be considered in parallel with these ideas. ID is on a reasonable proposal - and Henry has indicated be it ADF or some other MU he's supportive. You have some weight behind these ideas to go back to congress and tell them of the proposal. If they don't listen or agree then come back here and convince the people. If congress wants to sit on its hands then woe betide some of them getting back in when they would rather shoot down any idea opposed to putting one forward themselves.
Get the unit/model going - can decide where and how to employ military strategy but it's about getting the community back on track first and foremost.
Totally agree that sometimes you have to spend money to make money.
What if one (any one, just FN pick one!) official government MU was made exclusive to official tanks who self-supply packs. Government provides houses, and agrees to put $xx MU-only CO to 85% on for every Aussie battle Good compromise?
And no, Guag, I don't want to get involved. eAus has far too many chiefs and not enough Indians. 🙂
Military reshaping was rejected by our lovely political parties. Even reshaping ADF was rejected. They like to stay in the past here, no moving forward, nothing. We can sit here find the solution on how to get Australia better. But then again all solution is frowned upon, all changes are frowned upon. No party is willing to accept Australia are at the weakest point, no pride nothing. They rather allow themselves to be wiped, without any research done on this, without being educated on the matter of being wiped.
Contacted several Governments, about allowing their country to be wiped to get the NE to end, and everyone disagreed with the idea. This country either wants to stay in the past or stay here, but slightly moving forward is a no go for parties.
Every idea that is being made in Congress is either thrown out of the window by them, because being wiped is better, more aggressive for them. Then feeling proud about a country, and at least have the feeling that we are worthy here.
And now suddenly the opposition is against the government, and somehow all the people who left, who previously had issues with people in here are commenting on the matter just for a little extra support for the good and ''loyal'' supporters of Australia. My ass if they feel proud and have Australia in their best interest.
ADF was discussed, I gave you suggestions, Don's MU was also accepted so no problem there either, but we are still left with 1 issue ...
We either keep fighting a back and forth war with no end in sight and lose our countries ability to produce goods to fight with, or, we allow the wipe and hit them hard in RW's, if there is more options then lets hear it, we all want a solution.
Either way we need a plan so we all have something to strive for, we are all on the same team here mate 🙂
Nice to see a gov article and healthy discussion 🙂
So stop commenting and bringing the value down Henry 😛
You're welcome. 🙂 Now start discussing away as you wanted to discuss if you don't start talking and discuss my points I made, I will no longer give a crap. Make yourself worthwhile.
o7
Talks arrived to this:
TW in regions of queensland and other region (in a ping pong war), giving to you taxes and at least 4 regions to australia (incluiding tasmania).
But suddenly, your CP was shouting today offering money (cc) to the fighters against peru and offering money to the country who send AS to peru and land.
So after that, obviouly all kind meeting have been over.
Many things were said. Peru never said they wear in favor or even considering the items you bring up here. Australia govt is always interested in offering options to its citizens.
Welcome to Adriatica !
\o/
OMG PLEASE DONT LEAD OFF CONGRESS WITH "OUR COUNTRY IS IN FLAMES"
Join congress and you would clearly know what I meant with in flames. It wasn't literally. It was based on events internally. 🙂
i know 😛 i am just thinking of obama starting his state of the union like that HAHA