Why the Non-Aggression Pact Makes Sense
Lieutenant Scheisskopf
For anyone who has not seen the non-aggression pact (NAP) yet, you should look it over if you can. That and Emerick's explanation are here.
As President of the eUS, Emerick has been charged with making the tough decisions that no one else can. Making peace through a temporary non-aggression is far from the ideal scenario for any of us, but by doing this, we will maintain our remaining regions while being able to fight another day here at home, as well as fight to protect our allies. Emerick has taken action realizing that the present is not working, but has given us a chance to make an improved future. In short, despite making a tough choice that will not reach 100% approval by any means, Emerick did the best thing because the positives outweigh the negatives and give us a chance to make up some lost ground.
Positives
Most important of all, the eUS has freed itself up to keep fighting PEACE in more advantageous arenas. Because the violations of this NAP are fairly steep, we can send our military to fight PEACE in eSpain, support Resistance Wars (RW) against eRussia (as I am now), help the eCanadians regain their territories, and rollback PEACE in eRomania and eNorth Korea. We will also be able to do all of this while still maintaining our fully preserved fortresses at New Jersey and Florida (honestly, having two more Q5 hospitals will make our Reconquista much easier to achieve over the long term).
This NAP also guarantees that the eUS economy will most likely stabilize as a result of not facing any further loss of businesses. Consequently, we will be able to maintain productivity while still arming ourselves to keep fighting. We will also be able to continue promoting economic growth to provide for new defense systems if and when we regain our territories.
I am not fully supportive of the clause which requires us to pay for successful RWs, but this NAP at least gives us the chance to have a successful RW since we will no longer be required to protect our own borders. PEACE pushed us straight across the continental eUS, but at least now we have the ability to focus on regaining our own lands, as well as those of our allies, because we no longer need fear our borders further constricting. I am also not a fan of conceding Hawaii, California, and Alaska, but let us worry about that at a later date when we may be in a better position to renegotiate terms.
To the Critics
There are negatives and I am not saying that the NAP was perfect. Instead, I am saying that the change from the status quo will leave us better off in the long run, as the course of the war in the past several weeks only promised our country annihilation. People have said such things as "it's better to die standing than to live on one's knees," or that "we should have made peace when we had 40 regions," and I disagree with both. If we did the latter when we were still reasonably capable of winning, we would have looked like cowards; by fighting to the death we would have found ourselves occupied, disorganized, and hopeless. This NAP buys us time to find more advantageous means of realizing our goals and regaining our territories. You will notice that I never called it a "treaty," and all should realize that WE ARE NOT QUITTING OR TIRING in our quest to regain the eUS' territories and prestige. This NAP gives us a chance to keep fighting without risking further losses-- everyone should love that!
Many others are lambasting Emerick because of his "failed policies" and for being the same as Harrison Richardson; again, I disagree. Emerick has tried on several occasions to change our warfighting strategy (recall the Delaware-Pennsylvania situation which backfired because of the Admins) and has succeeded today. Instead of fighting a formalized war between us directly, Emerick has given us the chance to fight more of a guerrilla-style campaign which may have a greater chance of succeeding.
Give this plan a chance to work, my fellow eAmericans, instead of dooming it for failure from the start. The country needs us now, and I hope all will answer its call.
God Bless America,
Lt. Scheisskopf
Comments
Good article! voted
Good article...it's tough to give up right now...but it's the quickest road to being back on our feet and it still leaves us with the ability to help our friends out.
51 or fight!
Logan, I am fighting right now because this NAP has freed me up from defending our borders. Couldn't have done that otherwise.
Thanks for reading,
Lt. Scheisskopf
MI- Charlie Seven
Alaska and California are no big deal, who the hell would want to pay 5000g for such crappy states?
Kansas high grain
Illinois (or even Texas) High oil
BAM problem solved
I say this is a game. What better place to stand proud, even if defeated, and play guerilla warfare than in a meaningless game where everything is imaginary anyways.
where is your pride now??????
@Moot: Alaska has high oil. California has high grain AND high oil.
Voted and sub'd. Here's some more horse sense: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/school-boom--897259/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/scho[..]/1/20
Reconstructionmaxx!
Also @ Logan: The 51 40 or fight slogan refers to the wish to invade Canada.
It is not an end, it is the beginning to rebuild eUSA.
voted.
The stupid admins just wanted america to lose and are manipulating us and peace to keep them from conquering the world.
Serioulsy, 26 countries out of like 50 with the top 4 against us? we clearly had no chance against peace; on a side note AUD is worth more than 1.5 the USD in the gold market. (move to Australia *Australia national party😉
No way!
Excellent and articulate article as always, Lt. Voted!
Excellent article. It's nice to read people that look at things objectively and logically, no matter what conclusion they draw. Voted.
Go eUSA
Fight and die now or fight and die later when PEACE attacks again in 4 months time! The difference is that we know we will fight and die later , but we MIGHT fight and win now!
If PEACE is negotiating , it's sure that they don't possess endless resources! Why would they even consider peace if they were as sure of our annihilation as our leaders are?
Bring them on to NJ & FLA. (,9,000 of our most experienced players). Let's see what happens then!
OMG fight to the death, not any of this surrender crap! Permanently giving up Hawaii, Ca and Al? no way.
Enjoy being PEACE's puppies, eUSA! Feed them gold while they attack and wipe out the rest of your allies, that's the way to go !
I guess this just shows your true worth again, NOTHING!
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/if-at-first-you-don-t-succeed-897329/1/20" target="_blank">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/if-a[..]/1/20
Give it a chance guys.
yeah, it may work
@Shopman: You have absolutely no clue what will happen in 4 months. Of course they don't have endless resources, however that doesn't mean they don't have the resources needed to weaken the eUS to an extreme degree.
@Weirdgus: You have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
Note voted and note subscribed. Fight the fight and win back your pride and the loyalty of your allies.
Weak-ididoodah
Yay now we can be hated by our enemies and allies too. Remember who our friends are. This is the same thing we were yelling at the eUK for and now were going to do it. -.-
I want to fight for you, but you give no more chances
vote
Striker, we can fight for our allies now because our borders are freed up. Give the plan a chance
Voted, Lieutenant