Join the new world

Just a copycat of what Mr Woldy posted up yesterday. Also the graphics are quite squashed.

If you had bothered to read both posts you would see that the information is different. Mine shows the voting for each member of congress. Woldy only gives the voting by party

Mr Knee, Keith has been posting a listing like this every month ahead of each congressional election for as long as I can remember, so to suggest it's a copycat posting is a bit unfair to say the least.

Reported for Spam

Could you make the lines between parties different so you can see which members are part of which party. Just an idea but up to you obv.

I can try something when I update this, thanks for the suggestion

Yeah, we knew this already Mr Woldy did a far more in-depth article yesterday which also covered all the debate and discussion congress has had as well.

This is different it shows how each individual voted to allow party members to decided who to vote for in the list primary (for those democratic parties who allow their members to vote on it). Woldy only shows the parties. The data and the intention of the data is very different. This covers the votes that count whereas most of the congress votes were irrelevant.

Yeah game does that for us

I find these articles very useful, Keith. Keep doing them, please. Woldy's were a little bit confusing for me.

All votes matter!!!!!!

no they don't for example the proposal for an election for Prime minister was so stupid that not only the proposer not vote for it, but none of his party voted for it either.

People vote for goats, they're allowed to make proposals. We should be constructive and not throw insults around at those we disagree with. I have reported on the proposals you describe, if the public have an issue with it they won't vote for them. That's democracy!

I've not insulted anyone I am just saying the obvious that this vote was so dumb not even the proposer voted for it! It's not that Everyone disagrees with him, it looks like he did not agree with himself despite having 2 votes
!

You didn't vote on your own sponsorship proposal, and all your party voted against it... But that's totally different, right?

I did vote on it
Keithunder
Keithunder to certacito and 35 more people | 4 days ago#90705167
5 MC
from 3 parties

But I offered to withdraw it in the grounds that 4 other members of congress did not support it. Since a great majority thought it was a daft idea it seemed pointless to put it to a vote.

You didn't, but that really wasn't my point, and it wasn't a bad idea - I voted for it.

Half the reason there are so many proposals is that people don't discuss them with their party beforehand. This is a prime example, either it would have been shot down by your party or you'd have come up with a more reasonable proposal that you could all get behind that probably would pass. Rather than you going solo and proposing something out of your hatred for Ajay and it failing.

So I should have work ed out the party line first like the Spam party does? I was using Ajay as an example of something that should not have been debated. So I have been accused of being Troll for trying to limit votes to sensible issues. I don't think I will bother making any proposals in the future, it looks like anything I propose will be voted down by the 3 line spam party whip and I will be accused of something or other as a special bonus for my effort. As Woldy's article shows Spams very rarely vote different ways

There’s a whip?
Why don’t I get these messages?

@AMD. who told you to say that?

Appleby usually tells me what to say tbf

numbers looking good all across the board, good work

Voted, I look forward to this article each month, thanks for doing it consistently each month

nice charting.