Join the new world

Please post a list of acceptable countries to fight

lol

Well according to our president our allies are having trouble and we are doing nothing to assist them so there’s that....

Still waiting on that list.....

Why didn’t you help Cuba? Moldova? Both were far smaller nations than the eUK. Did Bear Cav simply fall asleep during that time? Did some members suddenly have a great reawakening of their mission, having been “fighting for freedom since August ‘09?”

Perhaps it has less to do with the eUK, and more of something to do with their opinion of the administration?

I eagerly await a list of acceptable nations for our own mid-tier support nation to fight. Thank you.

Everyone can construct such a list based on their personal beliefs and fight accordingly. It is about respecting each other's freedom for doing so. But don't get me wrong I really enjoy the President writing articles my fighting habits and I hope he continues to journal daily the battles I fight in.

Except when a group like Bear Cavalry decides, as a whole, to engage in a battle, it impacts the whole country. If a large group of citizens says “we won’t attack X” and/or another group says “we won’t attack Y” and yet another group says “We will defend Z” it affects our national cohesion, defense, and foreign policy.

Such actions on the parts of group actors will limit our ability to advance national security, as well as the security of our CODE allies and cooperation with them.

By giving us a list of nations, or a parameter, then we know how best to create a cohesive national battle plan. We know what our limits are and where everyone would be willing to be engaged together in battle. I look forward to such a list, in the best interest of our country.

BC has 200 total and around 20-30 active members. Afaik it was 5 or so members that fought for Turkey yesterday. It is flattering that you think these 5 people make a tangible military difference as to warrant being a consideration when making decisions in military policy, but they don't. If anything the government made it clear that they don't plan to rely on our damage in the future by stripping us of our American status in discord.

I think you'll agree that requesting each individual citizen to submit a list of countries they would want to fight against and aggregating these lists is beyond impractical but if you think this is worthwhile I encourage you to propose this to the MoD, and if the idea gets sufficient support I will happily comply.

Believe it or not, but 20-30 people can make a difference in a battle, especially with concentrated effort. Even those 5 players, in an obscure RW, can draw resources away from other battles. I know it left people scrambling to find some overnight damage in order to not derail the campaign.

However, you were not stripped of your American status. The Defense team no longer trusts the actors with access to the #Strike-Room. That's the only room that those people have been removed from, and fairly.

Requiring individuals to provide a list is not important, unless they are tanks/legends. Requiring influential groups of people (like MUs) to do so is not crazy, as this nation tries to come together as one people with cohesive battle plans. In ye older days, the US-AIM group used their leverage as military operators to stymie/change American foreign policy. Knowledgeable lists like that helps to create a truly "national" foreign and defense policy.

As such, I look forward to lists of approved nations to fight.

Actually we did voice concerns about Cuba. So feel free to check yourself. To reiterate my article states that this was not a BC action. Just a small group that aren’t followers and tools.

[removed]

Here's the "voiced concerns"

----

“How were they "screwing around with our allies"? Just for clarification purposes." - Shiloh

"Portugal attacked Turkey in recent times. Turkey launched a counter-offensive and Cuba cut off the border, so that Turkey could not go after Portugal. Therefore, we are REMOVING Cuba." - Me

"So there’s an explanation for Cuba, but what about Moldova?" - Lil Jeep

“Preemptive DoW" - Me

----

That's all that was voiced to me by Congress. It didn't take much to persuade y'all that this was some sort of just war, and not us stomping on little guys. Just as well, "voicing concerns" is not the same as "taking action" which is something you did for the eUK, but did not consider for eCuba or Moldova.

Just as well, where have you been while our alliance is unjustly stepping on the throat of small nations like Colombia? Colombia has been wiped and chased around the eWorld by the forces of CODE. They're the size of the eUK, and haven't gotten the same attention. Ignoring other small nations, when they don't score political points back home, isn't what I call "fighting for freedom."

Fighting for Cuba and or Moldova would have been fighting directly against the eUS, plus the reason for the military actions against said nations was laid out clearly by the Exec. something this CP cannot do. He lacks the intelligence to do that. Poor boy is over his head.

Flying for Turkey in one Air Round hardly made a difference, matter of fact I believe that round was won by the Brits. But I knew if CG was online and he saw a few fighters from BC flying against his grand scheme he would blow a gasket. And boy did he. Then when Ulster''s Finest started laying some serious, damage down he totally lost it. As usual he let emotion over ride any rational thought (if he has any) proving once again he is easy to manipulate.

I also knew that words like treason, quisling and other terms would be thrown around. Of course the mandatory article the next day how I am a traitor to the eUS. And how SFP plotted against him.
None of course which is true. Oh yeah the immediate reaction by Wild Owl having me kicked out of the US discord. Oh that hurt so much, as if I give a crap what that POS thinks about anything. Please by all means continue the circle jerk you clowns have over there. Do enjoy

In BC we play the game as we see fit. Deal with it, or don't, i can honestly care less what you think.
During the invasion, the occupation and finally the liberation BC fought to the best of our capabilities fighting for the US. We always have and always will fight to defend this country.

Oh yeah I did question the war against Sweden, you Dio. So I voted against and did not fight in it

Thank you for having the courage to come out and say that this action was primarily to aggravate the president, and that it was not for the benefit of the eUK or eUS. Rather, it was just political theatre.

Why does fighting against the eUSA matter? You should defend them, anyways. After all, Part IV, Section 15 of the SFP Constitution states the following:

----

Part IV: Democratic Rights and Political Strategy

1. The Ten Points of Solidarity appended to this Constitution express the general political orientation of the Socialist Freedom Party with respect to democratic and civil rights.

2. The following three sections define the overall political strategy of the Socialist Freedom Party for promoting revolutionary freedom for the individual player within a framework of social solidarity. Implementing specific initiatives within these three strategic goals is the responsibility of the Revolutionary Committee, with participation and oversight from the Party as a whole.

15.2. Support for the defense and liberation of small and oppressed e-nations.

15.3. Opposition to e-Imperialism in all of its forms.

----

If e-Imperialism is being hoisted upon another nation by the eUSA, the SFP should stand in opposition. Just as well, SFP members should support the liberation or small and oppressed e-nations, regardless of who attacks them. If the eUSA attacks a small nation, justly or unjustly, we should be opposed to this attack both in word and deed. I've considered becoming a part of the RC, just to bring greater attention and focus to these points of our constitution.

While I openly admit to falling short of our party's esteemed documents, and the ideas therein, you and your comrades quite like to use its rhetoric and reasoning while doing nothing to follow it, unless it scores domestic political points.

BC may play the game as it sees fit, but it certainly hasn't done so with any consistency. If there's anything about CG that I can say, it'd be that he's been pretty consistent.

That is how you understand the action. I see how you might come to that conclusion, though not totally accurate. I blame that on 2 things.
1. you are driven by a partisian motive to connect BC and SFP in some sort of official capacity in the individual actions I made in the London Air Round. After all you are a CG enabler.

2. I am not explaining things clearly in comments section. therefore I will write an article explaining what I did and how the Cult of CG wants to see it.


I do not have time now since I am watching a replay on CSpan of Trump's Impeachment.
Ironic huh?

Also BC and SFP went seperates paths about 4-5 years ago.

I'm not connecting BC and SFP. TheePostman said it best, when he stated that "this was not a BC action." I'm referencing the SFP constitution in your role as an SFP party member.

As an SFP member, I'm not motivated by a partisan motive against you. Bringing negativity upon the party also brings negativity towards myself. I'm only seeking to create a more cohesive national policy, that we can all get behind. I prefer to come at that angle from the ideology of Socialist Freedom. I think lists or parameters from influential people may help create more cohesive policy.

I watched a lot of impeachment hearings, in real time, in the unusual down time that I had today. It was fun to watch the GOP make a mockery of themselves in the hearings, while Ambassador Taylor gave us great and truthful testimony.

[removed]

I need comments on all my articles so feel free to help a brother out lol

Ursa Fi!! O7

Great material TP, keep em coming.

Glad that some of you folks are scared of a 2nd tier MU changing the coarse of the war the PP wanted with 6 members fighting ....glad it wasn't EZ company he might have stroked out

I personally find it amusing but that during past year bear cav hasnt participated in real wars once. But when they get opportunity to mess with cg they are dropping millions of air dmg xd

Guess we all have different motivators.

I fine it amusing that some folks fall in line and do what they are told because they dont want the fall out for doing the right thing ...I get it it is easier to do that .than deal with the repercussions of doing the right thing ...some are sheep some not.... everyone needs to find out for them selves which they are ...Hey I say have fun with the game ..Play how ever it pleases you...But just so you know ...and Im sure you do... BC did not do millions of air damage the numbers you typed are not true and folks can look them up

Last 4 RW have all been BS wars with the exception of Indonesia which I know most of us contributed or at least attempted to. Sweden, Cuba, and Moldova severely underpowered compared to the US.. Spain was and should have been a good matchup but came at a awkward time if I’m remembering properly...

Thats not true. As stated BC did not support the War with Sweden. I did not fight but other members might have. As far as Cuba, Moldavia, and Spain all DO's were set for it and members fought. I know I fought in whatever Air Rounds I could.
I really do not understand people who have never been in BC know so much how we fight..
Yo yourslf that you did not fight in Spain

FYI spending FF's != real fighting

Alas, I'm not judging you, the correlation is just too funny not to point out.

o7

Nothing I have seen about this in the SFP feed, no party briefing pm I have received either. Much fuss about a few people fighting FOR Turkey. No airstrike either it seems for now.
https://www.erepublik.com/en/main/law/USA/225801

fight the fight fight fight

In keeping with the spirit of CP's telegraphing their intentions to their 'enemies' the UK CP has revealed the UK's target region for the airstrike - https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-cp-battle-for-washington-2707619/1/20

Obviously not as much 'warning' as Chickadee gave the UK but our CP's manifesto was "Elect the other guy please" so we didn't actually have anything planned out in detail or advance.

Yall should ask to join our TW rotation, it could be good for a laugh XD

CODE already has us taking part in TW cycles whether we'd want to or not!

I guess some things never change, after leaving this for a few years I come back to see Bear Cavalry still undermining eUSA interests.

Imagine my shock.