Interview with TheJuliusCaesar, the SG of Pacifica
B. Mester
I made an interview with TheJuliusCaesar, the SG of Pacifica. I think he know the answers, whitch we didn't (like secret NAPs).
1. What do you think about Hungary? Are we good member of Pacifica?
A good member is a member who helps other members in need, as well as participates constructively to the discussions within the alliance about the wide scale of issues. Hungary is easily one of the more active members in Pacifica when it comes to discussions, and we can pretty much always count on their help on the battlefield. So yes, Hungary is a good member of Pacifica. The majority consensus of the alliance may not always agree with Hungary's opinions, but I am extremely happy we have so far been able to constructively discuss the matters through. It is good to have a bit differing opinions and especially the courage to voice them openly. This is one of the great strengths of Pacifica, I am extremely glad to have Hungary on board.
2. What do you think about the competitive aliance, Asteria?
Asteria, a strong alliance, is certainly something to consider and keep in mind when we're planning the acts of Pacifica. I do not consider any alliance or nation or block an eternal enemy or ally in the black & white sense of things, world is just different shades of grey. That said, recently Pacifica's objectives in foreign folicy have coincided with the objectives of Asteria in foreign policy, which means we have found ourselves fighting side by side against common foes. This wasn't the situation when I started as a SG back in December 2016: back then we got sucked in to a conflict with the Orion alliance and were, at least indirectly, fighting against each other. Things change and foreign political circumstances change 😛
3. Hwo is stronger? Pacifica or Asteria?
Asteria has a slightly upper hand compared to Pacifica when it comes to raw damage output. Hovewer, the actual strength of an alliance depends on many things, from diplomacy to internal cooperation to foreign relations and so on.
4. Is it true, that that the member of Pacifica have got a (secret) NAP with the members of Asteria?
Pacifica's official Non-Aggression Pact with the Orion alliance, following our conflict in early 2017, expired in months back. I am not aware of any secret explicit Non-Aggression Pacts by our member nations. Some might consider that attacking certain member of Asteria would be pure foolishness, I guess that can by others be considered an implicit "NAP". But it's not reall a NAP, as it is not a written pact.
5. If there were a a war between Romania and Hungary, does Pacifica support Hungary? If yes, how much, if no, why?
The baseline is that Pacifica always defends its member nations against an aggressor. I do not like engaging in hypothetical discussions publicly about what might and might not happen, but to be honest circumstances affect the situation a lot. But I digress, as you asked a specific question. If Hungary gets invaded unprovokedly by Romania, of course Pacifica will be there to defend you with more numbers. If Hungary was to be an aggressor against Romania, I believe that would negatively affect how much different members would support and engage in the battlefield. As Pacifica, at least currently, shares similar objectives with Asteria in foreign policy, it would be pure foolishness to burn bridges there. It would definitely weaken the direct help Hungary would receive in such a battle, of course depending on each member nation as I can't answer for them.
5+1. Is there anythig, that you would to say?
Thanks for the well thought out questions, it was a pleasure!
Ha van rá igény, holnap kiadok egy magyar fordítást is.
Comments
o7
Voted.
TJC is king
o/
Hail Pacifica!
Hail Julius!
Nice interview, voted!
"If Hungary gets invaded unprovokedly by Romania, of course Pacifica will be there to defend you with more numbers"
Only with more numbers??? Not with all??!
So if Hungary gets attacked by Romania not unprovokedly, Pacifica wouldn´t give a damn on Hungary? And if Hungary would attack Romania, Pacifica wouldn´t assist Hungary at all? We know already the answer as we didn´t see Pacifica´s help in the past. You even fought against Hungary.
Sigh. I know you're in a hard position there in Chile, but you should probably try to do something else than throw meaningless insults around with no substance unless you want to isolate yourselves even more.
Just a friendly tip.
no insults... just facts
1. "more numbers" is a comparison of relative amounts, not a concrete figure from none to all. Compared to Hungary attacking Romania, yes member nations would probably defend Hungary with more EB's if Romania attacks Hungary. Pretending otherwise anywhere would be disingenuous.
2. If Hungary attacks Romania when provoked, Pacifica members would "give a damn". I am merely observing the fact that the enthusiasm would be less than in completely unprovoked attack. Pretending otherwise would be disingenuous.
3. If Hungary attacks Romania, Pacifica members would assist Hungary. Again I am just observing that the amount of enthusiasm would most certainly be lower when COMPARED to the situation where Hungary is attacked unprovoked. Pretending otherwise would be disingenuous.
4. No, no concentrated fighting has happened against Hungary. You know as well as I do that all fighters cannot be controlled, no matter how marginal. Pretending otherwise would be disingenuous.
Dear god.
2. enthusiasm would be less than in Romania's unprovoked attack*
"the amount of enthusiasm would most certainly be lower",
lol, why you just can`t say that in plain text: You won`t help them. Why do you need to veil and rewrite what we all know in advance: Hungary can`t count on its alliance in a HUN-ROM war.
I am just stating facts. The enthusiasm to fight against unprovoked Romanian attack would be higher than fighting for a Hungarian unprovoked attack on Romania, which the members know would piss on to collective plans.
Again, pretending otherwise would be disingenuous. I know you just want to stir the pot, have fun in your magical bubble where fighting is somehow separated from politics.
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2642199/1/20
Just to clarify my thoughts if they remained unclear. Sorry for spamming xd
We all know Pacifica members are cowards, maybe except Latvia they will never make any move against Asteria, let a war be provoked, unprovoked or whatever. Pretending otherwise is disingenuous.
jullu vitun jutku
o7
julle raus
Voted.
We love you, Jules! ❤
[removed]
Ez a patkány (is) MPP-t tart fent a romserrel, mint a komplett paci fika.
Ez a semmitérő banda az &ssh@ole fiókszervezete, romser csecsén lógó haszonleső.
Ennek a senkinek minden szava kígyóméreggel maszatolt hazugság, üres manipuláció, ami sz&rt sem ér, pont mint a paci fika.
Bolond aki elhiszi, még bolondabba, vagy aljasabb, aki terjeszti.
[removed]
lol
thanks to 3rd world country president E.Morales who bought for his impoverished country a brandnew satellite I can´t, xD
the jews deleted my comment
it was so funny
Nice interview, we have nothing.
When Romania crossed the Hungarian border after he was defended the attack, he became an agressor. Pacifica do nothing.
Coward liars.
That's not how it works in afraid. Again I am merely observing that being the aggressor affects the support negatively, as it did in your last attack on Romania. Whether it should affect is another question, but it does affect.
Thats how it work. And pacifica do nothing. Becouse pacifica is just a joke, a bad joke without strength or without any respect.
What is the difference to USA's attack against Ukraine? Wasn't it an aggression? Ukraine did provoke the attack?
They did by being ukrainians
Than Romanians did by being Romanians? This argument doesn't make much sense
you don't make much sense
When Syndicate got wiped by Asteria & Co, Pacifica suddenly found itself fighting on the same side against the weakest countries on eEarth. What a surprise! Ridiculous.
Turkey is the weakest country????
OK 😃DDDD
Not in absolute terms, but the ongoing attack against Syndicate made it an easy target for Pacifica