A Modest Proposal
St Krems
Dear America,
I break my long silence to come to you with what some may call a Modest Proposal. America, I think you should kill your political parties. Hear me out, I also think you should disband the government military and become a country lead by a militia-political complex. Let me explain why.
The current political system we have is essentially different groups of friends vying to see who can recruit the most newbs to their party to vote in elections. There's no reason for this other than to boost their own power and there's no differences in political ideology between parties. While these parties have produced many outstanding individuals who have contributed to the country in sundry ways the parties themselves have done nothing for this country and the ongoing efforts at recruitment serve only to benefit the individual parties and do little to further the cause of America.
My Modest Proposal is to re-invigorate American politics, make it interesting again for players, make the differences between parties actually matter, and make the running of them actually of benefit to the country. In essence, my proposal is to abolish the idea of political parties as we know them today, the parties of cliques and friend groups, and replace them with the political wings of our various militias and military groups.
It has become increasingly clear to me that the nature of the game has changed and that our current political system is a hangover from the days when our government was run by roleplaying scrabs. This game is now about war, and our political system should reflect this. Congress debates should no longer be about the merits of one set of congressional codes over another but about the best way of supplying a militia and how to recruit more newbies.
Allow me to sketch out my vision fully. No official government military, all funding goes to various competing militias who all either run their own political party or perhaps are in coalition with another militia in a top 5 party. The current 'politscrab' parties full of people without much interest in the war module could be consolidated into one top 5 party, introducing real differences in the visions of our top 5 political parties. Furthermore, introducing politics to militias will give them a chance to get involved in the running of the country and give them an incentive to recruit newbs (While newbs may not produce much damage they have the same number of votes as a tank, giving each militia/party a real incentive to try and catch and retain newbs).
This proposed change would eliminate the, basically, dead-weight of the political parties on our country, make politics about the things that actually matter in this game (how to produce damage and the best places to concentrate it/what type of militia is best (RP vs Laid back ect)) and give the people who are the real decision makers in this country (I promise the president spends more time speaking with militia leaders then congressional leaders) an official place in our government.
Anyway, mull it over, and let me know what you think America. Oh, and don't worry about how we would actually make it happen. Political parties have only held onto power in this country because their existence is mandated by game mechanics. If we found a better use for them that would eventually be what happened. I hope to hear from you soon.
Yours in The Light of The Flame of Reason,
Sir St Krems, KOD, KBG
Comments
Oh, and please don't see this as me trying to get back into politics, it's not.
outstanding proposal
interesting read, voted
Problem is that one would need multiple solutions for a problem to get a difference in political parties, and sadly erep only gives us problems with one solution.
>JCS party
>inci party
>politscrab party
>ST6 party
>EZC party
I see a lot of serious potential differences tbh.
And here I thought this article was going to be about eating the noobs for wellness 🙁🙁
~hyuu~
I don't think this is possible
And? Would this make the congressmen be chosen more wisely? Will this solve the question of optimal policy? Will this help with the decision-making process?
Not that I am against the idea. But I don't see any advantages. I guess it would lead to congressmen of a certain group act in unison; but nothing besides that.
It's been said that one useless man is called a disgrace, two are called a law firm, and three or more are called a Congress.
I'm hard.
[removed]
It will never work.
What you are suggesting is that the politifags give up their power. There is not a chance they will do it.
Just like the JCS refused to give up their military, the politifags will do the same.
That's not to say that I don't like the idea, I find it refreshing and an exciting alternative.
Great idea....sooo...what next?
Sounds like anarcho-capitalism.
I agree, we should eat Irish babies.
I'm not sure tying political success to increases in funding and military influence, or otherwise further entwining our damage dealers with politics is a good idea.
Don´t you think that this could be a result of the long list of changes that eR had? I mean, if we began to think that political module is dead, so let´s think how to improve it to make it appropiate to this new times.
Krems I like your style.
Tbh, I don't like the idea. For one, disbanding the government forces that various people have already put a lot of time and effort into is an uneccessary chore. Especially when you risk breaking up coordinated efforts of damage dealers across the board. Not just us, but the JCSF as well, I'm sure.
I know your heart is in the right place and I like the idea that people are still thinking of ways to improve...but 1) I don't think you could ever get either side to agree to ANYTHING that dismantles their powerbase. 2) We'd be far less coordinated, which is something I shouldn't have to tell you is caused by this war module. 3) I could not give less of a poop about politics. I'm not the only one, either. I don't do parties, I don't do politics, and it's probably something I'll never HAVE an interest in.
I thought that was the system in place. Is it close to being overthrown? And your suggesting, it be put back in place once those of us that want to see change, make it happen.
Interesting ideas--I think replacing a national military + peripheral militias setup with all militias is something we should explore. However, I'm still not sold on having militias compete with each other in politics. I mean, as long as militia groups don't become the cesspool that party politics often historically has been, it could be a good idea.
Well who knows, that could make this game a bit more interesting perhaps
Hell yeah. DO SOMETHING INTERESTING FOR A CHANGE.
I've kinda missed you Krems *hugs*
>JCS party > USDP/AMP/AWP?
>inci party > duh
>politscrab party > UIP (Yeah they're the only gay ones)
>ST6 party > USWP
>EZC party > Feds
It's kind of already happened. Just using old names and whatnot. The unfortunate truth is that while the political parties are all friends that like hanging around with each other (and enjoy politics), the military is the same thing, with the exception that they don't in-fight and backstab (not that all politicans do this).
So congress becomes the council of captains (or designated reps thereof) who compete for funding (with in-fighting/backstabbing) to fight.
Where fit the business/econ-wonks, the programming geeks, the writers and trolls (why I keep coming back), the diplomats who like the social interaction, etc. You are right about where the focus of the game is and where the central game issues are. I don't have, and need, a sense of where what I value here (less and less central to the game) fits in.
You act as if there are no business/econ wonks in the militaries or programming geeks (of which I count myself)... there are plenty of writers and trolls (why do you think I'm called The Do*che).
You act as if the parties are the only things that could attract these types of people.
hmm...maybe I implied that. I suppose I was thinking of STFU and fight. Good advice for the war game, and the pursuit of political power for it's own sake is a distraction from that. I wonder about the opinion that all argument, dissent, goals other than the war should become criticized as a distraction. Practitioners of such frivolity distrusted and not allowed into power because they do not take the war seriously or cognizantly oppose the consensus viewpoint on the current war.
interesting. I can see it happening, but I don't see it being fully implemented. Even with the Feds/EZC, which was designed to be hand in hand, you will see Feds not in EZC and EZC members not in the Feds.
❤️ >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=%6e%61%6b%65%64%2d%67%69%72%6c%73%2e%6f%6e%6c%69%6e%65%2f%6b%6b%2f%78%6b%44%57%43%39%3f%73%6f%75%72%63%65%3d%65%72%65%70%75%62%6c%69%6b%26%61%64%5f%63%61%6d%70%61%69%67%6e%5f%69%64%3d1780363