Should terrain mode become a permanent feature

Day 4,674, 03:23 Published in Ireland Ireland by Releasethe Krakken

Cons

1. It shortened campaign duration considerably. With double points for most contested battles. I can see how this made it extremely difficult for smaller countries to hold regions. Some claimed that with a short burst of activity the smaller foe could seriously outdo the bigger one. Perhaps bring in more determination for smaller nations against their bigger foe on their original home regions.

2. It spreads players very thin all over the map. Perhaps bring in rules to limit the number of battles at a certain stage. This can be done with a meta arrangement between all alliances. Let's call it fair play rules for the republic(perhaps another player could elaborate on this. As this would require I think a lot of discussion and research which is beyond the bounds of this article.

3. It nerfed players strenght.



PROS

1. It was implemented already. So making it permanent wouldnt be difficult for the admins. Perhaps even a non update.

2. It limits strenght in a terrain. Meaning more players could be competitive in that area. For example division 4 required only 40000 strength.

Yes I know that tanks will always have hoarded more gold and bought more eb's which they use to suck the life out of the game for the rest of the players but atleast on a certain plain a player could be competitive and here and there snipe a medal from a greedy medal hog




On my way out so no time for music


Comments would be appreciated since I had little time for this article.