{RSU} Congress Elections
Revolutionary Socialist Union
Greetings eAustralia,
Well it is coming to that time of the month again when eAustralians go to the voting booths to choose who will represent them in congress.
Currently the RSU has 4 candidates running for a spot in the total of 40 seats (at the time of writing there is 5 regions being held, one which is under attack and another occupied that is in the midst of a RW) being offered.
These candidates are as follows:
Kattrrina
Rusty D
Damian Gaby
T.A.X.S.I.R.A.
All these four candidates have proven themselves as active and responsible congress members in the past. And they have assured the party leadership, that they will take their congressional roles seriously for the up coming term.
While nothing is assured yet of congress placements, the RSU plans on following the path it has already shown. One of questioning, one of public discussions on law proposals, one of ensuring accountability in congressional matters and one of ensuring it's members voices are heard inside congress.
So come day 3,109 eRep time, put your vote in for the RSU so your voice is heard.
Want a better understanding of a aspect in the game?
Want a question answered?
PM me or comment down below.
And as per normal, if you have any questions, please feel free to ask them.
Archived articles: (please be aware any archived article listed maybe out of date and do not show the current attitude/standing of the party, but will be listed as a testament to the history of the party)
RSU Party Outline: Can be found here
Other RSU articles: Can be found here
Comments
Don't worry we will have all our regions available for congress as some sneaky CO's are currently being set against the Resource Wars sequence \o/
There goes your idea in congress about limiting congress to 20 - 30 seats I guess Guag.
But unsure where the 'sneaky' part is, COs are very visible... also you do realise the CFH is separate to the RSU? Just like the many other MUs are not linked to different political parties.
Guag, questions related to the game are allowed only. Please be more specific 🙂
But one way or another you will get any answers, hope you are satisfied with them because others you will not receive:
http://prnt.sc/b7re1a
Ask questions in comments but if you really have questions ask them in PM. Do not spam this beautiful article!
Yes J, ask an RSU questions here, since it is an RSU you article... Pretty straight foward isnt?
Or should I find a CP article and ask you a question in the comments there ?
I want a better understanding of a aspect in the game and I think here is the place as it is staged in the article. What is the problem?
What aspect do you want to understand ?
I didnt see a question about game mechanisms, just a picture....
Why should I bother to ask questions when I see how you answer on others o?
Not sure where I made the connection between RSU and CFH in my comment, then again if there is something to hide people will always walk the comments away from the original discussion.
Limiting congress? Since you brought it up, I suppose that was a factor behind CO's then? It wouldn't have anything to do with hanging Ireland I assume.
Guag your assuming a lot aren't you. If they idea of hanging Ireland was it, wouldnt COs be set ages ago? When they first landed....
Why mention COs in an RSU article, when the RSU is separate to those COs? Hence why I saw a connection there.
1. All RSU candidates are not CFH active members.
2. The person who set CO is/will be not involved in politics.
3. Voting against government CO but placing private funds on the wrong side is not related to any of your comments Guag.
So please Guag, just shut up and enjoy the game!
Once again J has put me in my place 🙁
On all 3 points he has taken control and ensured any comment I have ever made or will make would be a redundant comment.
If only I understood as well as you did my good friend o7
I'd like a question answere😛
Why did you set COs against DoD orders?
Where are the DoD orders Gudz?
If you have a question for me ask me in a PM, why ask it on an RSU article.
I think he was addressing it to the second candidate from the RSU, which sounds fair.
The order to unset those CO in eNT still stands, so I will reiterate it here as you have not yet complied. You have previously refused despite requests in the MU Commanders' group message and IRC. Are you asking me to write a special article just for you? Because all other MU commanders have had no trouble and we only had to relay orders to them once.
Ok, wasn't it you that put ADP and MEK together? Since MU's and most political parties (KH is the only one I know of which are not) are separate.
CO's are based upon keeping regions secure/handing over regions in battles, hence why it was brought up in the article stating we have regions.
Why are you still questioning me when I obviously stated something based upon the article
/me finds pile of poo
/me gets stick
*poke* *poke*