Fingerguns Deems Congress Too Stupid To Exist
Goddess Dilvany
I been catching up on Jane The Virgin and I have been thinking about how people are full of shit. Like okay watch the Jane The Virgin all the way up to the season two finale. I swear that the only people capable of writing this shit are people who have freaking doctorates in TALKING SHIT! Like who are these people? The congress no lifes?
During a live stream Fingerguns, the almighty dicktator.... I mean boxtator? vagtator? Anyway she told me to start a vote to impeach her, because it would be funny seeing a few of these congress no lifers flip their shit. Due to the fallout of I found that I should request my own censure and then see what happens from there. This is the testimony I delivered in the congressional committee.
"You guys are acting like the law is straight forward. It only says that I get an automatic censure and that it is ultimately up to the SoH. The law is basically vague because they want to encourage critical thinking in actual decision making. That seems to be the intention in the constitution.
So I don't see why this isn't a clear issue. I didn't do anything with bad intent and I asked permission from the president to do it. So it makes sense to overturn my censuring. Don't be stupid."
Now lets show some good awesome reasonable comments
Niemand
"I am against foul language but what real harm is done? Let's try to have a congress as full as possible."
DM Johnston
"Removing Censure usually just comes down to a question of "do enough people in Congress like you enough to care to remove it."
My guess is that the answer for you is no."
Fingerguns
"I apologize for starting all this shit. I really just thought it would be funny. I forget sometimes just how super srs everything is in Congress when it comes to certain people."
Ya Boi D Money is the second coming of Ajay Bruno?
Shadowber
"who said ignorance isn't a defense? In this case there was no ignorance, simple as that.
I beg to differ... I think ybdm is a danger to the eus."
Andy Dufresne
"He seems to be censured constantly, at what point do we blacklist?"
Shadowber
"yes... which is why I'm not willing to consider removing the censure.. he is a repeat offender..."
So what I have gained from this is that taking actions that have no effect on anything have "consequences". I am some how the most dangerous presence in the eUSA. That Ya Boi D Money, who recently has demonstrably cleaned up his act writing quality articles informing the recent events in congress, running live podcasts, burying the hatchet with old contentious enemies like Fingerguns, a congress term where he posted exactly ZERO shit postings on the forum. WOW! That Ya Boi D Money is getting real bad. I think we need to blacklist him.
I have only been censured at my own request. Never have I been censured where I have not started the proceedings. The first time I was censured I was protesting the stupidity of congressional censures. There is no repeat offenses.
Look at people like Centomax. A good honest person who was thrown under the bus and attacked for a mistake. Look at me proposing something that has the same effect as doing nothing. We allow dogma and some bizarre fetishism of the meta rules to run our government. Even if you read the constitution on the particular law they are going after me it reads this:
"Any Congressman proposing an in-game impeachment without having followed the procedure described in section 3.3 of the eUS Code shall have their forum privileges suspended pending disciplinary action to be determined by the Speaker of the House."
The people who actually came up the constitution were rational in that they realized that sometimes you have to have things open to discretion. These people who would have you believe they are defenders of some rule of law, white knights of the great precedent that holds the republic together, vanquishers of evil,but they do the opposite when it benefits them. What really is going on is that they just don't like me. They are weaseling their way out of the fact they just want to exist in a bubble free from criticism.
Comments
And the Speaker used said discretion to have you removed.
And you're not at all dangerous, as you're completely ineffectual. Removing you is the same as doing nothing, so why not remove you, right?
~One of the people who wrote the constitution
I acknowledge the speaker has such righta but I disagree with the precedent being set here. Context should be taken into consideration and you should deter behavior that actually causes harm.
If a guy does something with no bad intentions and doesn't harm someone should that really be a crime?
Furthermore I was heavily pressured into such actions by non other than fingerguns. I am a victim of peer pressure.
Grow a backbone, is all I can suggest. You took an action which any reasonable person would know would have a consequence, now you're complaining. Sorry, not sorry.
But why do these actions have consequences?
But officer, why do I have to go to jail for breaking the law?
Well it is just a question. Authority doesn't justify itself. I am asking what justifies this punishment?
Congress has devolved into a group of whining and corrupt gradeschoolers. The game is dying and congress could actually provide a vibrant and interesting adjunct to the game that could breathe new life into it, but they choose to accelerate the death spiral by embracing their inbred little clique even harder.
Sad.
Congress could do this how? You've contributed nothing in this regard, yet you complain. Step up, Gonzo.
Or just buy more gold.
I did 18 terms in Congress and became quite frustrated with it. You have half of Congress not even active in the game anymore, which is a disgrace. Discourse is based on likeability and maintaining the status quo. I find the whole thing repulsive.
You've said Congress could "provide a vibrant and interesting adjunct to the game that could breathe new life into it".
Please elaborate. If you hold the secret, fill us in.
Pfeiffer you (deliberately) missed to answer that your majority of congress (USWP & Feds) has half of congress not active in the game. You maybe have the power due to your marriage and due to other relations, but at least you could try to answer all. 😉
Niemand, you really should have people proofread things for you.
Yeah i think EVERYONE needs to lighten up anyway (pssst this is a game people) the fate of the world dose not depend on who or what is in or out of econgress. and unless you made a new years resolution to be more of a bitch you shouldent. maybe we should put freedom of speech in that constitution i cant believe so many people are being censored for being ineffectual... isent it someones job to train people how to BE effectual in congress how about we blame the teachers and not the students for ONCE!
I semi agree with this statement. But I like the spirit! 🙂
Number 1... LOL
number 2 centomax was thrown under the bus? Do you mean the sfp immediately began attacking him w/o giving him the benefit of the doubt just cause he's a fed?
number 3 as far as I understand you asked fg if you could do it... that doesn't sound like her "pressuring" you.
number 4 I was joking when I said you are the most dangerous person (and I said so, though you obviously didn't find the need to post that part). You are about the 5th most dangerous 🙂.
number 5 you did this fully expecting the shit to hit the fan... So stop whining and take your censure like a man.
I only did this because I thought reason would prevail I thought you would throw your hissy fit then we could move forward.
I will be putting out the podcast soon. So you can judge fingerguns and I soon from the source.
But you have to admit you are punishing me just symbolically since I proposed something that has ZERO chance of happening.
no... I am not even "punishing" you.
But YOU have to admit you enjoy being censured....
So is it a punishment or a reward?
What? Because someone is a Fed all of SFP attacked that one. 😛
I am sure that isn't the case. Try to be more outside group think. There are a lot inside all parties that are reasonable.
ok I have tried to find the relevant discussion but could not for some reason. So I will have to backtrack on that... but please... the feds are the least "group think" party in eUSA, especially compared to sfp..
We mob rushed Cento? The same way we almost all voted to uncensure pog and were ready to do so for Cento? The guy we have in our podcast voice channel you need an invite for? Damn dude he must be a masochist to hang out with us for hours every other night huh?
FG forced absolutely nobody, she brought up the idea as a fun joke considering she was gonna be dictator anyway. I guess her thoughts were that Congress would use their brains and realize that a useless proposal that has no mechanical outcome does not require Cogress to put on the show of ridiculous bravado.
read above in regards to cento.... in regards to pog however.... it's funny that when sfp'ers are being discussed in regards to blacklisting/censure, at the very least the titles of those discussions mention the name of the person, not the party they are from... When phil harmony started the discussion on pog he titled it "Censure of that Romanian USWP Congressman fighting against eUSA"
OK? Anything else to add besides cherrypicking a pretty minor thing that ended up being inconsequential as we voted to uncensure him? I think when you stop trying to say 'Tu quoque' it's pretty onvious there's no substantive reason to not uncensure YBDM.
what? where did I use Tu quoque logic? also, there is a very good reason to censure him... that being that we cannot have anyone just playing pranks (especially ones that can endanger the safety of the eUSA) on congress. If we un censure ybdm now, we are essentially opening the door for anyone to do the same thing with no repercussions.
In response to me saying that we were fine with Cento you brought up Phil being brash ("That Romanian...") when it had no bearing on the fact we uncensured him, which is also another issue but considering that it seemed to try to downplay my points is why I called it tu quoque. Also, YBDM and FG specifically chose to make the impeachment because the dictatorship would be put in place instantly. Like, I see why y'all might think his action will somehow allow precedent to play that prank when it actually matters, but I'm sure Congress will realize when it's not happening during the D battle or something of the sort.
Bitches, yo cray-cray.... FG is the boss of all y'all!
copying Pfeiffer, because it is true for me too
~One of the people who wrote the constitution
Just because someone in authority asks you to do something doesn't mean that the action won't carry consequences. "I was just following orders" was debunked as a defence 70 years ago during the Nuremberg trials.
Agree on all the other stuff. Congress is a retarded monkey put with a large population that barely plays the game anymore.
To be fair I am not killing jews
And as a result, you're not facing capital punishment.
Why isn't anyone talking about jane the virgin. Like what you guys think about the last episode?
I like virgins.
Let me see if I understand this correctly: After conducting a "false-flag operation", you complain on the fallout. Did you expect this to go any other way?
Cry wolf let loose the dogs of war! this is so hilarious they cry wolf so much when they actually get blacklisted or censured who will believe them... QUICK wile noone is looking blacklist them.