Join the new world

South Korea and Taiwan Nap memorandum

For long period of time, eSK and eTaiwan, there had been an impenetrable grudge relationship between them, until when both parties realised to maintain peace is a shortcut toward mutual benefit as old proverb states there is no permanent friend or foe.

Thus, at the end of 2014, eSK and eTaiwan had reached to creation of NAP. As a result, both countries could build trust in their relationship, putting old feelings aside and this NAP could be extended for a year.

However, as CP of eSK, I can't help but to show a great concern toward a series of events occurring now. According to NAP article, eTaiwan agreed to occupy
Gyeongsangnam-do, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Jeollanam-do, Jeollabuk-do and Jeju-do. (Refer to 3rd article of memorandum)

But, eTaiwan attacked the region not included,Chungcheongnam-do without any prior notice. Though I do hope that this move is unintentionally induced mistake in their reset plan, that is, hopefully, without any aggressive purpose or intention to end NAP, this is apparently violation of memorandum.

Moreover, in order to clarify this move, I sent PM to CP, MOFA and MOD of eTaiwan, only CP, whose answer was very vague and not sufficient to explain such move, replied among 3 officials, and eTaiwan CP also shifted the responsibility to dictator of eTaiwan. (current eTaiwan Mofa)

Based on anticipated impact of such move that may bring bad influence to fiduciary relation of eSK and eTaiwan, as representative of eSK, I would like to demand for full-scale explanation of particulars.

The explanation and implied attitude of eTaiwan will a crucial role in the relationship of eSK and eTaiwan

===================================================================
(sorry for bad eng grammar)

after published above article and talk with RoC CP
NE to Chungcheongnam-do discovered as mistake

but, after starting the battle 16 hours, RoC haven't gave me a proper explanation
This happening clearly violate the NAP agreement between SK-RoC

under the 7rd clause, Korea could insist fine
7. Any violation against Item 2, 3, 4 and 6 stated in this agreement by one party results in a fine of 150,000 cc to opposite party.

but, 10th clause
10. Furthermore, both partys also have the right to define this violation as an ACCIDENT, and an official announcement in newspaper for explanation is required.

but i believe this situation happended accidently

so i demand to RoC goverment publish official article with english
about prevent recurrence such a happening

I hope South Korea and RoC keep the good relationship for the future


best regard


seoul city
South Korea CP/Dictator