Air scheme for Pilots of India - Trial Week
Fernando de la Cromid
Air scheme for Pilots of India - Trial Week
Eligibility: 400+ Air kills, < 250K strength, < AC air rank.
Formula for currency distribution = floor(min(userAirKills, 1500)/totalAirKills*weekly_budget)
totalAirKills: 13,953 (with 1500 cap kills per person)
weekly_budget: 10K cc (Imaginary)
Last week winners:
wittyprakash Kills: 2,920 CC won: 1,075
mikibandit Kills: 1,486 CC won: 1,065
come2findu Kills: 1,472 CC won: 1,054
SbkRazr Kills: 1,324 CC won: 948
W A R O K L A W Kills: 1,257 CC won: 900
Light Fury Kills: 1,248 CC won: 894
Netaji Subhas Kills: 1,074 CC won: 769
Dobbytheelf Kills: 1,067 CC won: 764
Obelisk The Torm Kills: 1,039 CC won: 744
Shivanshu Singh Kills: 904 CC won: 647
VinSkywalker Kills: 679 CC won: 486
Tejas Mkx Kills: 462 CC won: 331
Su 30MKI Kills: 441 CC won: 316
I can increase the cc distribution budget if I have more sponsors. The current sponsors are
Imaginary - 10,000 cc (From next week actual sponsor list will be published. I'll also add some sponsorship from myself)
I can publish the updated ranklist and distribute cc to winners tomorrow (From next week since this is a trial week) once interested sponsors donate cc to me.
Happy gaming.
Comments
o7
I can sponsor. Govt (majority) or CP (whatever he says) can approve/disapprove my request in reply to my comment. If I get no reply, no sponsorship from me. But o7 for your efforts. Hope richer people can fund u.
Floor(min(player_kills, 2500)/total_kills)*weekly_budget means that if someone crosses 2500 kills, then not all of the budget will get used. What happens to the rest in that case? Does it get eaten away? Bit sure about others but I smell a scam here. Just like you tried to pull off in your CP term during resource wars.
You may be good at pulling a lot of things, but you can not pull the wool over my eyes. I will continue to reveal your lies every time you say them, so don't think that you can get away so easily.
You can check this example erepublik.com/en/article/2744336
The point of capping is to get extra cc to those who can't cross 2500 kills.
So basically you don't want people to cross 2500 kills...
no.. everyone who gets more than 2500 kills get equal cc.. say if u do 25000 kills and someone is doing 500 kills then they would get very very less cc.. so this cap for kills balances cc distribution.
I highly doubt anyone can spend half a million energy inside of a week to do 25000 kills.
Do you know how much half a million is? It's 5 followed by 5 zeros. Are you aware that I am approximating the energy required to half a million? Are you curious how much the actual number is? It's 750000. Can you read that many digits at once? If not, let me shorten it to 750k for you, so that it fits in your 12 brain cells.
With me so far? No? Then read again. Yes? Then let's move forward.
Now you must be wondering why I took your number literally. Well, save your remaining 9 brain cells, because I am exaggerating, just like you did. Surprised? Thanks.
So, to make you understand my point, let me clarify even further. It's not that people will actually do 46278284838292838383 kills (by the way, I am exaggerating again, so don't be surprised. If you actually read that number then I am sorry for your loss). They may get to 2500 if they try. If they try harder, they can do more kills, which is a good thing. I hope you agree with me. But I know that is beyond your potential.
But I will carry on with my explanation anyway, because others also read this. It's not just you.
So, at this point, you are not giving incentives to go past that, to make the extra push beyond 2500 kills. So they won't, which not only results in less damage on their part, it leads to lowering of competition in the long run, and also eventually hurts your program. I recommend not doing that.
You are not understanding the formula. Check this erepublik.com/en/article/2744336 . This is a successful formula that is still being used by LT govt to reward their pilots. Can change the 2500 to 1500 if Indians cannot do 2500 in a week. May be even 1000 but that would ruin the competition.
I didn't understand the formula? I hate to break it to you, but I've written more code than you can hope to read in several months. I know exactly what the formula does. Heck, I can even tell you the runtime complexity, only your dumb ass probably doesn't know what that is.
Long story short no, reducing is not helping. Removing the cap will. Pretty sure a 3 year old could have figured that much out from my comment, even including the amount of sarcasm on that.
By the way, just curious, how are you rewarding yourself in your own program? Is it like how you tried to boost your own account when you were CP? Because there are some similarities that I see. Like how you are looking for government funds. Like how you are looking to boost a limited number of accounts. Like how you're leaving out certain sections of eIndia. Deja Vu much?
What's the problem with organiser participating?
I am not looking for govt funds though they can sponsor if they wish.
I only left out high strength and inactive accounts obv competition would not be fun.
It doesn't look good. There is nothing legal about it, just doesn't go well in society if the well fare organizer + sponsor participates in his own well fare campaign. But its ur money, u can do whatever u want though.
If you are organising, you should not participate - that's literally how every event works. It only takes organising one actual event IRL to figure this out. However, this is only a matter of courtesy, so I guess there's no real reason to pursue this point.
About government funds, you are not looking for them. I agree. But then, you are looking for other people's money - weird for someone who claims to have more efficient money making tactics than me. And if you are using this to reward yourself (admittedly among others), it is not different from selling hits, which you can easily do elsewhere. Heck, you could try and take an MU, and collect a few people and sell hits together, this is exactly what this sounds like to me, coming from you. If I think about it like that, it is no different from your housing scam - using money from others (in this case a volunteering contribution, in that case taxes) to boost your account (here along with a merit based assignment).
And you have now decided to add a minimum number of kills for pushing activity, so at least that's one positive in this mess.
Maybe I'm overthinking, maybe I don't trust you, maybe I don't even want to try. But as long as it is the first two things, I can not help you, and I assure you it's not the third case.
I've changed the minimum kills to 400, kill cap to 1500 and an imaginary budget of 10K cc.. Let me know how this looks @Visor @Netaji
Ok
Increase, not decrease max cap. You already have 3 people near or over 1500
[removed]
If I increase to say 3000 kills then
I would get 1899 cc (That's about 20% of full budget which is not fair)
mikibandit would only get 966 cc
Su 30 MJKI would only get 286 cc
Current cap kills is slightly better balanced so extra cc goes to ppl in the bottom as well.
When more and more ppl cross the 1500 kill mark I'll increase the max cap to say 2000 or higher.
Which is why you give our more than 5k, and keep yourself out off the list. To put things in perspective, I can donate all my q1 food production, 20k or so q2 food production, all 70+ wrm production, all 30+ q7 weapons production, and still get over 8k per day just by wam. So even if you do 5k per day, and take weekends off, that's 25k to play with. Remove your kills and see how much they get out of 25k. You will (probably not) see the point I'm trying to make - the problem isn't in cutting off at a lower kill rate.
Actually there are two different logics, no point fighting over it unless u understand each others perspective. Witty wants to normalize the prize distribution. Whatever might be the amount of budget witty wants to normalize it across all competitors irrespective of kill value. Visor doesn't want that. He wants to give proper value to kills. If someone makes huge number of kills, it makes sense for him to get larger amount of reward. No need to normalize. If someone makes smaller kills we dont want him to give him high rewards just for the sake of a normalized distribution. Hope u understand it now witty? u r correct with ur explanation but we just dont want that system in itself, no capping, u hit more, u rank up more, u get more rewards, that's our sole purpose r8? o7
we tried without cap in LT and all budget went to top 3 which is why we introduced the cap
nice
I can be sponsor for next weeks
I think I have decent amounts of fund, no need to reward me, feel free to help others with lesser money.
help others who need money**
I don't know if we can trust a guy who runs script and steals SH medals in Indian battles..