Join the new world

And here we go again :/ we remain same in real life so as in virtual

However Voted.

LoL SFQ bhai It was just the sawari part was humor jazbati hou rahay hain app ..not good not good...Jo banda mazak ker kay kudh seh na sakay usko baray mein phir kiya kahoon..Khair apnay mujhay ik janwar say tashbee di which is very ethical thing to do...wait you just wrote an article ... you have clearly abused me..while i posted a picture of donkey just for humor. Many people across pakistan use it as ride. I didnt expected going this low from you...mazak jaab kisi per banoo toh acha lagta hai

You have crossed thin fine line of humor and being abusive.. as for my absence I informed chairman senate and CP and I was intouch with them through mt cellphone..The chairman senate who is my brother through this game allowed me to go and made sure i am in touch with bilal everday. You have hardly worked in a government deputy mofa azzy and head of ambassadors ariovistus did their jobs in absence..I had given my deputy tasks to pursue which they did admirably...

most importantly yes i am minister of foreign affairs and as minister and servant of the people of epakistan it is my duty to ensure that they are upto date on our relationships and foreign affairs deal..it was briefing to tell them what epakistanis have the right to know. It seems like TSP has no understanding in regards to "how to serve people" . only TheJakal excused i didnt knee he was just senate..

i didnt knew he was just the senate*

I never commented PRF was dead please find me such a comment... PRF will never be dead..PRF zindabad...Now kindly stay on topic... thank you

Pakistan Zindabad ..

TSP enjoys a very close relationship with PRF and Chairman of Senate Raao.

And TSP and the senate will be there for Pakistan if this new war goes sour.

1. You TSP guys need to learn what Representative Democracy is -- and why, it cannot work in Pakistan.

(Representative Democracy is what we have in most countries in real life, including Pakistan, the United States, UK and India. People elect a representative for the vast amount of issues they have, for them to be dealt with in * their * idealogical belief/direction. This isn't possible in ePakistan as we're far too small; everybody knows each other, we barely can field a full congress, etc.)

2. As per Representative Democracy not being able to function fully in Pakistan, certain issues have to take into account the views of the general populace -- and the matter at hand, was a very controversial one. After all, we can all complain about Mush entering the WoT, but as per Fahad, Foreign Affairs, the Pakistani populace - as vast as they are, irl - had no say in the matter as it rests solely with MoFA.

(Democracy = Demos & Kratos = "People Power".)

3. Absences happen in a game -- however, did you not, yourself, Fahad, say that Foreign Affairs is not the job of the people exclusively (i.e., a form of direct democracy, which is practised often in Pakistan)? Furthermore, if you're not in FA, how would * you * know what happened within?

(Also, as you're so quick to hit us up with RL examples, I fail to realise how you made the mistake of thinking the Ministry of Foreign Affairs deals with war, and not the military through the President.)

4. The debate you (TSP) organized was a domestic, non-Government one. Nobody had any real obligation to join; you didn't have the mandate for that (i.e., you don't hold a majority in congress to call for national meetings, to put it in simpleton terms). That said, the National Meeting was within mandate, and Raao did intent. I don't get it why you're associating Raao's attendance with him being in PRF, unless you're publicly denouncing TSR and yourself for being "lazy gits".

5. I do not see where Ahsan said "TSR has no understanding of serve people" (may I advise you here to improve on how you articulate yourself, it sounds like you're serving left over dishes at some side-lined bazaari restaurant), freedom of speech, yes; but frivolous accusations, as you've just done so, are an entirely different matter. Put in simpleton terms, you have the right to speak your mind, but creating alternative realities should stay within the confines of the mind.

6. I don't see where Ahsan called you a donkey; again, frivolous accusations without base. He was merely referring to the fact that once you do come into a position of authority (or even attempt to acquire it), one should make the utmost effort to attend meetings of national level. Put in simpleton terms, re-focus your efforts by, instead of publishing party propaganda, focus it into attending events of national importance. If you made the assumption he was calling you a donkey, that's you.

7. I don't see any public mention of any sort of coalition (as Fahad put it in his recent article) government existing between TSP or PRF, nor of any electoral agreement to suggest a "very close relationship". What I do see at the moment is a cordial relationship, which we afford any party, except the Oligarchy (whom aren't a party at the moment, more of a group of people). I don't how things run over there at TSP, but PRF isn't a one-man dictatorship.

8. I don't see how you're speaking for the Senate in the first place when you're not the Chairman, or a statement in regards to the war was approved by the Senate. Moving on, the TSP is a centre-left party (put simply) at public value, so I don't see how it is TSP's job especially to fight wars. Put in simpleton terms, it is the job of politicians to Govern, and Generals to strategic and fight wars. I'm sure there'll be a gold-subsidized offer for career changes soon, though.

Policy, you are no doubt an outspoken individual. However, the current time calls for me to focus on something far more important than answering you. I will get back to you shortly however.

At the moment we have agreed on reconciling our differences, however, with due time i will answer all of your questions and help you get rid of your misconceptions. You have no doubt been a part of this game longer than us, but the current affairs seem to be beyond your understanding. You are entitled to an opinion as all of us are, however the analysis above is based on assumptions. One should gather facts, rationalize and process information before speaking out.

At least that is the rational and logical way to do things, "IN MY OPINION". Anyway, as I just mentioned, our focus is on something way more important. I hope you understand.