[A Party] Rebellion in a Revolution
Day 3,230, 05:13
•
Published in USA 
•
by
•
by Cerb
(Theme music for this article - click here)
Once upon a time, I was trusted with the fate of the eUSA. Some of you may even remember such an era. I sought to change the way we look at foreign policy, media, and of course - war. I don't believe in the endorsement of the status quo. I don't believe in suppressing change. I believe in WAR and CHANGE.
Back in 'the old days', the SFP was a fringe party, a distant 6th at best. Obviously I returned to a time period which sees the SFP as a top 5 party. The SFP even rose to 2nd place, only to drift down into 3rd. Why is the SFP, formerly of second place, sliding down? What has arrested its growth? After spending more than 40 days and 40 nights in the SFP, I have some thoughts.
I have some suggestions.
I'm told the modern SFP doesn't allow anything forbidden by its forum constitution.
I'm told the modern SFP must admit anyone even known traitors.
I'm told the modern SFP only permits opinions which are anti-Pfeiffer and anti-eUSAforums.
I'm told the modern SFP frowns on collaboration with the USWP, AMP, and Federalists.
I'm told everything associated with the eUSAforums is elitist and evil.
The SFP has become the very bureaucracy of elitism it claims to despise. This party is squandering its top 5 potential, but not all hope is lost. This party needs a facelift, a new brand. It needs its own internal rebellion, which is both ironic and fitting. A truly revolutionary party should not be content with the anchors and shackles of the past. It should seek to grow and evolve, faster and more significantly than other political parties.
And so, I challenge all party members (and even eAmericans) to consider what this country truly needs to make it great.
Does it really need bitter, jaded rhetoric about elites?
Does it really need status quo politics?
Does it really need forum constitutions constraining potential fun?
Does it need inactive committee members and cabinet members?
Does it need status quo foreign affairs?
Does it need sluggishness in reforming the nation's military?
eAmerica needs what it always needs: WAR. CHANGE.
I am Cerb, and I'm here to remind you that this game is at its pinnacle when great change is thrust upon us. And so, I stand against the forces of bureaucracy and mediocrity, a rebellion inside of a stated revolutionary party.
As Party President, I will rebrand the party consistent with your wishes. I have made some suggestions in the survey linked below, including but not limited to:
- American Revolutionary Party
- American Labor Party
- Citizen Soldiers
- The Rebel Alliance
- Rogue Squadron
- The Browncoats
As Party President, I will select knowledgeable, intelligent changemakers for Congressional candidacy. Click on this link to sign up!
As Party President, I will give YOU the opportunity to get involved with media, politics, and cross-party diplomacy. Simply message me if you want to get in on the ground floor! I want to hand off the torch some day!
Join us. Join the American Revolution. Click here.
Join us. Join the American Revolution. Click here.
Join us. Join the American Revolution. Click here.
Cerb
Rogue One
Party President
(A Party)
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
You are going to make me regret having LEFT the SFP.
Don't hand it off until you've accomplished this good goal.
Who, in their right mind, would have bailed on this soap opera?
Cerb is right
\o/
What you are being told, best to check whether it is the truth. For me the SFP is a party with different opinions. Only with diversity a revolution can rock. If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution.
I think I can be part of the revolution Cerb is doing. o7
Some of us uphold those standards and work our butts off. There are a few who are just sitting on a throne of entitlement. I agree that they need to come down from the high horse and get their hands dirty.
FIST
"The SFP has become the very bureaucracy of elitism it claims to despise."
giggles everywhere
Also if anyone can whip SFP into something not candy ass I think that will be Cerb.
That being said, while I don't like the 'idea' that is SFP, there are quite numerous capable and cool individuals in the party that could without a doubt be great CP's.
Browncoats!
Oh you are back Melissa \o/ 😘
No just clicking. I'll be back fully at the end of October though 🙂
I am proud to be a Black Sheep
Baaaaa
lol Aren't you like the 3rd or 4th person to try this?
What you are saying is they became like USWP which is funny being most the people who tried to change them also came from USWP.
All I ever seen was old players joining SFP to change them for what they believe they should be but they were once a great group before they let certain people takeover.
There is a reason former USWP people try this. USWP and SFP are both success oriented, but SFP has been mislead by a few revolutionaries who forsake success in favor of misguided principle. Those individuals have NEVER been able to sustain success.
Cerb is not trying to USWPize SFP. He is importing a success culture into the good ideals of SFP.
that is why I wish him well and would even consider returning should he succeed.
This is a joke you were one of those people who mislead them right into blacklists. They were doing just fine before any of you tried to make them more like what you think they should be.
that is absurd. THEY led ME that month. Don't talk out your ass. I was quite minding my own business.
when you say shit like this you demean yourself.
I ask Pilot Phil to testify on this.
lol so they told you to run for CP based on the fact that you will get rid of the dictator laws that you helped create? Also how is moving to a party to recreate them in the way you want minding your own business?
To all of you that went to SFP wanting to change them for the "better" go start your own party.
Henry, Gnil is spot on here. Gnil didn't lead us to do what we did. If anything we led him to run on an anti-dic platform. You need to get your story straight if you are going to spout off.
Pilot I feel bad for you just let all these people come take over your party and you just let them. I was here trying to stick up for you guys but I just realized you are not the same group I was once friends with.
Also I have heard different and gnil full on knew he could not change the dictator law without congress so if you tricked him or he tricked you it ended up in you all looking like fools and being blacklisted. GL with your new party I hope it goes well!
Define 'success' in erepublik.
Define 'success' in erepublik.
Success in erep at least in eUSA means whoever has the most multis has the most success.
Most of the T5 parties are held up by mulitis.
I define success internationally.
IMO, if YOUR success does not equate to eUSA's success, it isn't success.
@WJ Success in erep? Getting more than 5 titty pics off of girls here. That's some god damn success right there.
maybe all parties need something like this....
endorsed
So Cerb actually comes into the game! Rare that alone.
Reform the national military? How many national militaries have you and your friends run into the ground, or chased off?
Controlled by an unwieldy external, limiting constitution? Sounds familiar as that is what the group you say SFP opposes (see anti-Pfeifferish, anti-USA forum comment) is all about!
Quite frankly I don't know why there was the migration from more Elitist parties (for lack of a better description, but one we all know) into SFP to begin with. It has wondered from Spooner's ideals.
I hope those that have been there for a long time can somehow regain their party and its ideals. I didn't always agree with them, but respected their desire to enjoy the game on their own terms.
Still super butthurt. Glorious.
Lol cerb is not our PP so we have no need for us to be butthurt. I know you are butthurt being you lost CP elections and couldn't even win cheating.
We do need change, but not top-down like this. The name change and the associated changes weren't made by discussion in the party, they just *happened*. That's not how we roll, we make consensus decisions.
I would recommend rolling them back and going about this democratically 🙂
This is coming off more like a PTO honestly. One thing I remembered about how SFP use to be was a name change would never have been done without a vote.
No, never. I remember asking Jude Conners about that and that was one of the few things I learned was sacred in the SFP. The name change is an insult to us all, from Osmany Ramon to Phoenix Quinn and beyond. It cannot stand.
It is disrespect for any new PP or even old to change a party name without any consent of the party members.
Ok for fucks sake, Cerb won PP. he wants changes, some sound pretty good, others, like a name change need to be reversed. It's not a PTO for goodness sake and if it is Cerb will be voted out next month. Let's all cool off a bit and see what happens. The SFP constitution isn't going to change without a vote of the party. Everyone can quit panicking, those within the party will deal with it and those outside can watch as we grow. I think the elders of the party and those that formed it and are no longer with us would agree that however we come out of this change/shift/turbulence we will be stronger for it. Jim Beam and ginger has spoken!
I am not in your party but if someone were to run for PP I would expect them to say they want to make changes to the party while running.
He did. Pay attention or STFU.
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-sfp-cerb-for-party-president-2612939/1/20
Pilot what happen to you bro? I really am done now if you want this again GL to you! All I ever wanted was good things for you guys.
I am just saying how I feel from what I have seen and what I once knew it is seems that has all changed. As I said before I guess whatever past we once had that was good is gone.
I apologize for that last comment HWF, I was a few drinks in at it was uncalled for, my bad
I vote Beam and Ginger ... Might be a good time for another SFP road trip to Vagas
Survey respondents have suggeste😛
American Socialist Party (abbreviates as ASP which is cool)
1776 Party
American Revolutionary Party (only downside is sounds like AARP when abbreviated)
The Browncoats
2nd Mass Party
No takers for the Star Wars themes? Womp womp.
Are we going to see the Survey Results in a spreadsheet?
I spent a lot of time criticizing SFP as the sixth party for stifling criticism of Pfeiffer's domination in the Ajay CP battles. I warned the SFP that Jude buying them into the top five would lead to this (and I am enjoying it), and any party letting Franklin run wild is doomed to failure,
The saddest part are the unfounded accusations leveled against me. I wrote plenty of supportive articles (beyond the trolling ones) and recruited a few players, and am still considered a member by many that do not really care for the drama the spokesperson of the party of late thrives on.
since its anarchist party there is no point to be the word American in the name.