[Proposal] Account Balance Management Reform
Lord TJ
ACCOUNT BALANCE MANAGEMENT REFORM
Dear Australians,
Today I gave a speech in the Senate (click here to visit the speech) where I proposed a change to the way government organisation balances and standards are applied in eAustralia. It's in discussion mode, the initial stage of debate of drafting a bill to vote on in the Senate.
Speaking as a current and long time Cabinet officer, for too long incoming governments have had to face their new terms with good Treasury books - but poor game accounting. To be clear I am not referring to the hard work of our Finance Ministers past and present, I am referring to leftover monies in org accounts from previous terms, that have had a budgeted purpose, yet hasn't been spent during that term and been allowed to accumulate and still Senate has to approve disbursements as the case applies.
Both branches of government have to persistently deal with a situation not of its own making and hear motions on a case-by-case basis for transfer approvals. How does that sound so wrong?
- .. because it's money that Senate has already approved in previous budgets
My question is: Why do we keep doing the same thing over? Let's do something about it.
In my regular conversations with counterparts in other parties, it came up in a recent meeting between myself and ARP president Mr Tim Holtz. It's fair to say we each may have different views on various issues, however Mr Holtz and I are in agreement on this.
Government has been put in a difficult position. What we're talking about here has nothing to do with internal appropriations within the same term's operational period. All the while org money is sitting there. The fact remains: orgs other than the RBA shouldn't have money sitting there from previous terms at all.
I have also long held the view that all funds not spent by the end of the Executive's term to whom the budgeted funds have been approved for, should rightly be returned to the official country account, the Reserve Bank of Australia, by no later than a short period of time before the transition to a new Executive.
The only other argument I can offer in support of this legislative opportunity, which is rare because we are not primarily a legislative party, is that when reaching out between different parties with often different goals occurs and there are base things we agree on - we should cherish it and build on it.
Many thanks for your time folks and have a good one.
Mick Gatto
KHMC Senator
Comments
Great idea and if I make it to senate I'd vote for it.
yer u have my support here mate.
I think it time for further change, we've had a good 2 pasty terms, lets keep it up!
o7
I too agree with this.
Yeah, except certain orgs actually get donations which by right need to remain in those orgs for their intended purpose. I agree that it needs be accounted for so that we know what those monies are, but if you take a donation back into Treasury you are shooting yourself and future governments in the foot, because all donations will then dry up.
A donation is not a voluntary tax.
Specific cases include Centerlink, ADF, and the Australian War Fund. Most often cash and goods are donated to both orgs for new player development and usually by players leaving the game. If its too difficult to maintain a spreadsheet, then dedicate organisations to those funds (as is the case of AWF) so that its clear. We certainly have no shortage of orgs.
It's easy then a case of centralising donation orgs from normal orgs because after a period of time there's no one left with a strict record of accounting. Simply saying Centrelink, ADF and AWF cannot be balanced because of donations is unacceptable. The Dept of Finance can remit any donations on a term by term basis because they will have a strict record on their books. Donations may be for a specific purpose, but it's still the government's responsibility to account for them.
this isnt a difficult thing tbh,
the MoF has a spreadsheet which outlines everything. furthermore you simply donate back to the RBA which means that money can be easily accessed in case of emergency
what this act also does is prevents certain people who run parts of the government from stockpiling and essentially stealing money from the people. which has happened in the past and venja has in the past resigned because of failed govt policy on this matter.
all in all this bill forces certain people (who should know better) from abusing their position. which imho is a good thing.
o7