[ILP PP] Alliances?
Winston Hope Smith
Hi Comrades & Collogues
There is an IRC meeting tonight that the CP wishes you to attend. (#irisharmy @ 1400hrs eRep)
Now despite the irony of a guy who in a childish temper tantrum damaged Ireland by blocking (with the other traitor Moomoohead) Ireland's application to PLUTO thereby leasing us more exposed when RtK's friends Lithuania came calling.
But we in the ILP are better than them and will support an alliance application once the
Which brings me to what proposal they will bring
It can't really be PLUTO considering most of those in Government consider PLUTO a hopeless and ineffective Alliance
It can't be surely Asteria etc surely even they would not stoop that low. (anyway they are breaking apart)
No the only one they can bring is Adriatica. But the Irish Army still has not reached the strict 80% damage threshold of that alliance (close but short). How could it when even most of those in power can even be ar&$ed to join it...
But I fully expect Adriatica to fudge their rules for little old Ireland just so Don & Co can claim the success. Even so I would support this application.
Maybe by the time the application is sent in those who are shouting loudest about this (Poor Sluagh is stuck those having launch his illegal Coup from a different MU) might actually join the IA bumping it's damage?
Either way anyone who wants to stay out of the IA can join the Labour's Peoples Army a vigorously independent MU
http://www.erepublik.com/en/main/group-show/702?page=1
Comments
Cue the trolls
but... IA has done 12.1 of the country's 13.2million dmg so far this week. That's over 90%.
is ur plan to try an break the dmg table if we apply to an alliance in order to block our entry?
can you imagine how entertaining that would be?
I have taken the last Full week figures...maybe you'll make it this week...maybe you might even join them. I said it was close but it is not 80% yet
You appear to have difficulty reading so let me repeat I am in favour of the application and will vote for it...if Adriatica fudge the 80% rule or you make it this week and next all the better
ImI is a national military utility. it exists specifically to disperse CO funds in the absence of the National Commander.
Last week's figures were hampered by cs restrictions and the usual delays of a large scale restructuring.
Sorry but Don was very clear about this the 80% was to have been in One MU...maybe as I said they are now relaxing that rule...
whs you're only in favour of it because you are ever the politician. you realise that if you do not support something so obviously beneficial to Ireland then it would be political suicide. but secretly you are raging inside and hope we fail because you do not want "don&co" getting any credit. If you think that much is not obvious and transparent to just about everyone who reads this article and your weaselish comments here, then you need to wake up.
sory but: any serious player involved in major alliance activity will recognize exactly what my MU is for. they are soldiers/strategists not politicians so ur squabbly little point will mean as little to them as it does to me.
Dear IBhoy if you ask Don he will tell you I was in favour of this over a month ago when first raised.
Maybe you are right Sweet I can only go on the published rules...that ma be the fudge. Whether it means anything to you is irrelevant as you don't have the final say
neither of us has the final say on an alliance it's true.
but an alliance hq does not stand on protocol, it marches on contribution.
the central MU rule is a qualification to facilitate coordinating dmg.
a gov member holding a solo utility to further manage dmg isn't something soldiers are going to have a problem with.
this was discussed some time ago naturally 🙂
Yes as I already said they may fudge their own rules and all the better for us if they do as as it stands now they need to
you came too wrong buddy
afaik I thought 80% national MU was an aspirational tarket rather than requirement
In conversions with Don when he was in Cro government it was a strict demand...maybe they have relaxed this
I think that may well be the case; a national MU at a certain % doesn't necessarily make it more efficient afterall
True but they "were" very insistent on it...we shall see
I'm not here to troll.
Just here to check if you're still mad. You must be.
*hugs*
Allow me to be the first 😛
Threshold for a referendm is 50%+1
Also could you clarify " Assuming the application is reasonable we would be supporting the proposal in a vote." Does this mean you will support an application but only if it's compliance with ILP standards?
I stand corrected in the referendum bit lol
Indeed, a national referendum would be required, I know we have used a variety of thresholds over the years, is the 60% an Adriatica threshold?
Two of the Conditions
(4) The trial member should hold a referendum on joining as a member state. It should get the approval of at least 66% of the votes in order to join.
(5) The trial member should also recieve support of their congress with the approval of 66% of the voting congressmens.
Whaaaat?! Power to Congress you say? Tell me more, 🙂.
I'll edit to make it 66%
there is no constitution therefore a normal 50% would suffice if indeed sluagh decides to hold a referendum. you guys are like this small kid getting bullied all day and wondering if you should join a gang that will protect your little skinny a*. Perhaps the referendum thing is written into their constitution. bu jus support it some things one just support whole heartedly.
The meeting was clear yesterday, it is 66%
you want to vote against it? forget politics your game does not connect all the dots. we need as strong as possible alliance. why are we even discussing it with noobs like you? we have 13 billion damage many big mu's have 50 to 100 billion damage. we need stronger allies and is limited in our choices.
Youre so wrong in so many dimensions. Wont even bother to explain.
Your comment in which you questioned Mexican MPP was the reason youve been blocked. Its funny how you always find a pathetic excuse for your miserable fails and terms.
Also the IA has surpassed the 80% requirement...
not in the last full week of figures
Look at the little rat, doing what little he can to prevent Ireland's progress while pretending he actually supports it.
So you support it but hate to see someone claiming it as success? Man you are bitter. Why do you bother playing? Everything you say is negative, an attack on somebody else or twisted double speak. If the game makes you this unhappy then maybe you should consider quitting.
Hmmm...what you're describing sounds like someone interfering in alliance matters by getting Mexico to prevent Ireland's entering yet they wanted Ireland in the alliance so long as they were in charge...
v
this is the article version of this song but it aint as funny and has no punchline.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ECmpUJdgm-g
so you support but think we shouldn be allowed but support it but is butthurt because you cant get us in butt support it.
and in english that means?
your assessment lacks worth. it is just hot wind like most of the other things you do are. in essence the reader see you are anti adriatica but then again you say i guess we have to join them but you now guys dc bend the rules to get us in but then again i support it. delete the article and type in teh ILP supports us joining the adriatica alliance. short sweet and to the point.
and in english that means?
Irish Lapdog Politicians ?