PCP supports Wingfield
bamber
Published on behalf of Rex
What up my comrades?
Guess who’s back from their vacation, tracing their way through the constellations. Yeah it's PCP, coming in hot to give you the scoop of the century. We, as a collective of like-minded individuals, have decided to back our good friend Wingfield in his attempt to become CP.
Now I know what some of you lesser mammals are thinking, “Zap is our official PP and not supporting his candidacy is blah blah blah”, listen up short stops I don't need to tell the adults in the room that PCP has a bylaw in place that restricts the enforcement power of any illegitimate leader. Although Zap is a good boy, the collective has agreed that we want a man who stares us in the eyes instead of ogling at our breasts. Unfortunately, due to our situation, with some lazy bum squatting on Bamber’s throne, we cannot show our support in anyway but our votes and our praise so just take my word that we will be voting for our boy Wingfield.
Listen, I know you and you know me so I know you are begging me to continue this article so that you can distract yourself from the evils of the real world, unfortunately this article is a open and shut case with little need for beating around the bush.
Oh btw fyi, Rex is catching up with his old pal Yurigavin in the cabinet, this has no bearing on the choice made by the individuals. We just prefer WRP and Wingfield to whatever Roachford is. Sorry Roachford, ya boy knows you won't take that personally. PS Bamber owes me a sandwich.
Comments
Is Rex losing his sanity and effort, find out next time Bamber steals the proceeds from the articles Rex writes.
They are funding a certain socialist states missile program
Well it's for the greater good then
14
88
69
Don't falsely claim to speak for the PCP. The Pirate Cat Party does not support Wingfield.
Best PCP does not support communism. Freebooting and pillaging for all! Yarr!
Many thanks for your support and that of your comrades, Bamber!
lies and slander
you cant fool people, it clearly states Zaphod has being your candidate.
I'm sure PCP's 4 votes will make a huge difference this election o7
With how close elections tend to be these days, it probably would make at least a little difference o7
This one won't be close.
" that PCP has a bylaw in place that restricts the enforcement power of any illegitimate leader. "
Typically communist, the democratic vote is ignored and the politburo appoints whoever they please.
These political non-entities can make up as much meta as they like, it makes zero difference to game mechanics.
To be fair, it does make more difference than your constant trolling.
Trolling? I was just pointing out that meta has no part in this game.
The PCP has never had a leader they are purely a spokesperson for the wishes of the PCP membership. Not sure how you don't know this simple fact as it's always been the case and you've been playing the game long enough.
Sorry but the PCP has a leader elected every month, your cosy politburo lost last month, live with it.
You have people that organise and people that need to be organised. ergo you have leaders and followers. You really are no different to any other party. Guess what? In the individualistic UKPP, we have group messages in which we discuss a concensus. TUP no doubt have something similar set up as do UKRP and WRP Ill assume.
Seeing as Sexa has never been a member of your party I feel it's a little unfair to assume he knows the nitty gritty of day to day worstPCP. He is very much correct in his statement that mechanics trump meta though...
We still organised congress like every month and we still backed a CP candidate like everyone month. Not a single member has expressed support for zaphod and I put him on the ballot for CP, where has them 7 votes gone that backed him in the PP election if he has all this support within the PCP..oh wait there isn't any.
Did anybody check if membership count actually went up when zaphod got elected? It's normally brought up by now in arguments about domestic PTOs, I feel we're slacking.
You can even check to see who went in and out of parties nowadays... marvels of the captialistic modern age!
Where's Paul Tyndale when you need him? He'd have dug this up straight away... and blamed Wayne regardless of what the actual truth was
Why are you so petty?
I can't interpret this to save my life but here's a graph of PCP membership over time starting from an arbitrary date:
https://prnt.sc/gh08kl
phwoar
Do you guys support Communism in real life or is this just a game role play?
Seems like Rex and Bamber genuinely do. The rest I don't know about.
That is sad 🙁
Middle class commies. Funny thing is, they and their families probably have a hell of a lot to lose under a socialist future
In normal cases I wouldn't care: I don't think it's a realistic ideology but whatever. These guys seem to be fringe communists who deny atrocities committed by Soviet Union (and I'm sure a bunch of other communist regimes), though, at which point I don't respect them as people, same as I wouldn't respect a person who whitewashes nazi Germany or fascist Italy or a number of other despotic regimes.
I don't know about Bamber, I am a working class bad boy with a history degree which is pretty rare in university (weird right, mainly liberals at mine). I do treat the USSR differently to nazi germany, I still hold the USSR to its mistakes but you will see me defending the history scholar greats like E.P Thompson who argue the same points. That means that I am not a fringe communist unfortunately, maybe after some more reading I will be though.
I see them as no different to Nazis, they are both dangerous collectivist ideologies. What I can't get my head round is the free pass the hammer and sickle gets in society compared to the swastika. In my opinion anybody waving either flag deserve a free helicopter ride.
Rex and Bamber are plastic commies. They would be the first to cry when the state comes for their parents semi detached...
My mother works at sports directs if that's middle class well 😛
Management or shop floor?
Admin something to do with stuff that returns to the shop
But you don't hold the USSR to its mistakes. Every time you mentioned a single USSR mistake you watered it down and followed it up with several counter-examples of "Britain dun it worse!" to further obfuscate USSR shit. Here's a couple of examples:
https://imgur.com/FdBvlBd
https://imgur.com/GPqAxHy
While it's argued whether Holodomor targeted Ukrainians specifically, it's accepted that it was a man-made famine which killed millions. Talk about "a bit different than there being no grain at all", huh. I was too lazy to dig out what the actual max sentencing to gulags was, but I'm guessing at worst it was indefinite and the 15 years are cherry picked by you from a time period when the Soviets calmed down a bit. You also didn't mention the prisoners starving and dying from diseases due to horrible conditions in those "work camps".
I'm not familiar with UK's history so I am not sure how accurate your statements in the screenies are, but I don't doubt they've committed genocides as well. The people who did that are assholes, too, and people who whitewash colonialism atrocities are not worthy of respect, like those defending despotic governments. Mentioning those crimes was pretty irrelevant when discussing Soviet Union though, and like I said earlier, the only purpose of doing that was to further gloss over USSRs own atrocities.
So yeah, you don't hold USSR to its mistakes and added to the fact that you see being a biased socialist/fringe commie as a good thing (both are your own words), I think you did enough reading to become one.
This is why I don't respect you as a human being.
I was really explaining my own opinions in a more macro effect, not trying to 'defend' my image that you have of me. Now we can go back and forth on the issues surrounding the USSR because, unlike nazi germany, the evidence of Soviet aggression is kept close to the archives in Russia itself. You can show as much evidence of me saying stuff, unlike many of my congressional colleagues, I accept what I say and do not hide from my own words. Just because I don't accept the failures that were mentioned by you or in the congress pm doesn't mean that I believe it is infallible, I don't agree with the Hungarian revolt (much like E.P Thompson) and I don't agree with the cultural imperialism that the soviets undertook but I'm assuming you are just looking for a 'got ya' moment within my words instead of understanding my thinking so I will just let you get to that, good luck.
Just to add, I only accept evidence of socialist antagonism if it is in a legitimate study by a legitimate source. So I can't change my opinion of gulags or socialist 'genocides' until that is shown, I personally believe that makes me better than concentration camp deniers.
There's not much to understand in your thinking tbh: you use biased sources to support your ideology and discard conflicting ones because they're not "legitimate". Fairly common behaviour among anti-vaxers, conspiracy nuts, religious zealots and other lunatics. Hence why I'm not looking for a "got ya" moment: if your mental gymnastics outmaneuvered what serious historians have to say, you're too far gone.
I made the posts above because I felt you were misrepresenting your views when you stated you hold up USSR to its mistakes or that your beliefs weren't in the fringe zone. It wasn't meant to argue with you, it was meant to give other people a better look into your beliefs and to show them that there's a reason why you guys are getting shit: It's not just because you're commies (though there's that, too), it's because you deny serious atrocities to whitewash your ideology.
Holocaust deniers are just as retarded Rex. I don't think anyone would deny such a statement.
As Roachford has already stated. You only see what you wanna see while denying reality. Socialism will never work while man has to use his own hands. We are not born equal. Some are able to produce more and as such should be suitably rewarded.
It's a cute idea that has been found to be lacking. Time to put it to one side and relegate it to the history books.
Humans are idiots and power corrupts.and that is why nothing ever works...And in Communism you get the rich communist elit.
And I won't even go into discussing Hitler and Stalin and their ideologies etc...both of them did enough damage in Eastern Europe...
And I see that you used a picture from China in the article, from a country that is actually a capitalist monster...
Why do we need to choose between Hitler and Stalin?
RP for sure, even in WRP being left of centre, it's all bollocks when you're playing an on-line computer game, sitting around without a care in the world and full belly. If I was trying to mirror my political views I'd have to be in a party of even more moronic players who similarly have next to zero ability to map political ideology to the clicking of two buttons.