Join the new world

So, I was recently thinking about a certain topic that seems to come into debated matters quite frequently nowadays; the matter I speak of is the constant war between science and God.

The entire argument itself is quite invalid, but I will get into that in a bit.
Firstly I would like to try and give the basic strong points of each side [in the most neutral form possible].


Basis of God Argument-- The Universe around us is too incredibly complex and well put together for it to have been at complete random in processes, which leads to a belief that their must be some sort of all powerful figure (God/Great Designer/etc..) who controlled the creation of these things.

Basis of Scientific Argument-- God is entirely unlikely in every aspect, almost all questions can be answered through scientific processes over time, and from a scientific point of view you must be able to accept that we do not know all the answers to the questions and we are willing to accept that until we can understand the answers.


Those are your basic arguments for this sort of debate. Now onto why they're both idiotic.

Both sides provide a fairly good reasoning for their decision of belief/disbelief; but they're both irrational and invalid because of one simple fact.

God is an "exodimensional" force, and can therefore not be thought of in dimensional terms; Science is a study of dimensional terms and forms (i.e. what is feasible and tangible within our Universe and reality), and cannot debate a God figure, and vice versa, God cannot debate science.

In short, God is an irrational subject and science is rational. Which leads to the easy conclusion of: God 😶= Science

Since I know I'll get attacked asking for more reasoning behind this, I'll see what else I can put.

Saying there cannot be God because of science is like saying can be no apples because there is oranges; it's stupid. There is no reason why one cannot exist because of the other.

In fact, in relation to this; many argue that science is a complete contradiction of God and is the basis arguments against it/him/her. This is an extreme fallacy, God and religion are the BASIS of modern science! Religions provided the first reasoning that there is certain laws that control the flow of the Universe and keep it orderly and these laws must be obeyed in order for life to continue.
Sound familiar? It's essentially the reasoning of modern science. The Universe has a set of scientific laws it must follow in order for anything to be possible, without these laws, any experiments people tried to do would be pointless because there would be no control over anything.

People also like to associate the idea that because someone believes in science, they cannot believe in God, this is also irrational. I myself, am a Deist, the very PINNACLE of a scientific God. I believe in an all powerful God who created the Universe, but then it separated itself from it (there's a God but it doesn't dabble it's fingers in our Universe's affairs).
This is not an unusual stand point either, scientists throughout history have associated themselves with this belief.


So, to summarise this article the best I can:
All arguments between God and science are irrational and invalid because the two are not in relation to each other as God is irrational and exo-dimensional whereas science is rational and dimensional.



Your humble narrator,
JMackinaw