Activity we H.O.P.E.d for, reality we got
Gyantse
Dear Friends and Foes.
In the last months we have seen an increased number of propaganda articles. You can say this is one of them, but (un)fortunately, I will not try to sell you some unproven statements or give you unachievable promises. I guess some of you will not accept the conclusion, but that is a risk I'm willing to take. At the end we can all agree that numbers don't lie.
I went through all the laws proposed this past month and checked congressmen of which parties are the most active and which are the least. Please note that votes cast by Director9, when he was a CP are not included in the numbers, while votes done by Genesis as a CP are attributed to her as a CM (before calling me out on this, believe me, the results are much worse for H.O.P.E. and their activity if I exclude Genesis’ voting history). After analyzing the raw data, I came to a shocking conclusion, that
From the 27th of November (when the new congress sworn in) till today we had 15 laws proposed. Out of those 8 were donation laws, 5 were concession laws, 1 was impeachment law and 1 was an MPP law.
On the last congress elections the results were the following:
× ATO received 39.47% of votes and got 12 CMs elected,
× H.O.P.E. received 34.21% of votes and got 9 CMs elected,
× DSP received 13.16% of votes and got 4 CMs elected,
× TBD received 13.16% of votes and got 3 CMs elected.
This means that since there were 15 laws proposed, there could have been this many of the votes cast per party:
× ATO with 12 CMs could cast 180 votes,
× H.O.P.E. with 9 CMs could cast 135 votes,
× DSP with 4 CMs could cast 60 votes,
× TBD with 3 CMs could cast 45 votes.
In reality there were that many of the votes cast:
× ATO with 12 CMs cast 159 votes out of possible 180, which equals to 88.33 %,
× H.O.P.E. with 9 CMs cast 96 votes out of possible 135, which equals to 71.11 %,
× DSP with 4 CMs cast 49 votes out of possible 60, which equals to 81.67 %,
× TBD with 3 CMs cast 37 votes out of possible 45, which equals to 82.22 %.
We have 28 CMs in this month’s congress and only 11 of them voted on all proposals:
× In ATO there were 8 CMs who voted on all proposals, with 12 total, this means 66.67 % of CMs voted on all proposals,
× in H.O.P.E. there was 1 CM who voted on all proposals, with 9 total, this means 11.11 % of CMs voted on all proposals,
× in DSP there were 2 CMs who voted on all proposals, with 4 total, this means 50.00 % of CMs voted on all proposals,
× in TBD there were 0 CMs who voted on all proposals, with 3 total, this means 0.00 % of CMs voted on all proposals.
The only congress activity, where H.O.P.E. showed above average activity was immigration. Congressmen of H.O.P.E. have given all their 9 CS passes, while only 2 CS was given by ATO congressmen and none were given by congressmen from DSP or TBD.
Since last congress elections, congress voted on 15 laws. Out of those:
× ATO congressmen proposed 7 laws,
× H.O.P.E congressman proposed 2 laws,
× DSP congressmen proposed 0 laws,
× TBD congressmen proposed 0 laws,
× Our presidents proposed 5 laws (all by Director9),
× Other presidents proposed 1 law (Norwegian CP).
Let me finish this article with a quote I found on the almighty internet and that a fan of any kind of democracy would probably agree with, “Not casting a vote is a vote against democracy.”
Take care,
P.S Be generous with the comments, still need to do my Senior Journalist mission.
Comments
Excellent work!
I'm just here for the drama
Ill join my husband for the drama 😛
Nice stats!
o/
You asked for a comment, here you have one. o7
Thanks.
Not voting doesn't mean that we are not active. It means that we stand neutral on that mather. 🙂 BS article
I assume not starting any programs also means you are neutral on that matter?
We still don't have acces to the Orgs. But you are well aware of that. Great strategy do.... sabotaging the new interim GOV and blaming them. 🙂
Coming up with an unbelievable conspiracy to hide your incompetence. Nice work.
VP, you should absolutely know that we have no power regarding the orgs. It has always been admin stuff how the orgs are handled and they have always gone above and beyond to hand back orgs that were taken over unlawfully. Fact is, some of your members are so stuck in the past that they see a conspiracy against them everywhere. I honestly suggest your CP stop slandering people and face the facts: She's living in the past and its unhealthy. Come back to reality.
Yeah well... everyone in EBe nows who the admins are. You know who they are... they are in fact ATO members.
It must be so confusing to be you, mixing admin and moderators. Also, it was never hidden that I'm a moderator, it literally said so on my profile for years now.
The thruth wil come out sooner or later. Nothing to be confused for. 🙂
Here is a fun fact you don't seem to understand and i may point out that i said this before last time your party was in charge.
You do not need the Org's to run your programs!!!
yes it makes it easier if you do, but it is absolutely not a requirement to do something for your citizens!
I always found it a poor excuse to not do your job!
Hmm, but your policy was voting NO on all the laws that the government didn't publicly announce. Meaning being a neutral is a BS argument.
Um no, there is either black or white, no gray. When voting is over there is no state as "neutral", is either passed or rejected.
Good reading!
just passing by to help my old friend to complete the mission 🙂
Thanks.
Nice stats so vote and you get your mission done soonish.
Thanks.
Neat
interesting read and nice graphs
Thanks.
I love me some statistics.
My comment.
Thanks.
Comment
Thanks.
We are Belgium
For the Devils 😛
o7
Is Belgium an eMonarchy again, now?
yes... and no. that's Belgium for ye! 😃
vote
Thanks.
There you go Gyantse o/
Skyline \o/
Lies Lies Lies and Lies ... o wait... more lies
Prove them wrong if you can 🤣
Telling it like it is.
I have to say, every single party in this game can do better with activity, but simply because no votes were cast does not mean it is entirely due to activity. Laws were abstained by some members
Why run for congress if you can't make up your mind about some simple thing as donation law or some more important law as concession law? Game mechanics only allow to vote yes or no, if you are abstaining on several laws, it just means (in my opinion) that you don't care.
I could likewise ask why ATO decided, along with DSP and BD to vote down a simple donation law to our reserve bank? Makes me wonder if you knew that there will be no access for our CP to them. Not saying you knew but it does make me wonder
https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2727670
Reasons were already explained, don't see a point repeating them.
Well abstaining from a vote is perfectly acceptable. I don't see the need to explain it to you.
I can't force you to do it, but you can't prove it either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
uhm
yes