Responsibility is the Price of Freedom

Day 2,031, 00:20 Published in USA USA by Azazel Romanov


Apologies for sitting backstage too much my friends. I'm no longer US MoFA but I'm still busy with all these CoT plans and discussions. I'll be 100% free in 10 days, but for now I'm still hard at work looking out for our alliance's best interests. There are a couple of things I could talk about, like our intention to free Russia, but it looks like Hungary's cowardice, I mean strategy, prevents that from occuring just yet. I could talk about Serbian plans to reform TWO, but it looks like they decided to withdraw their "equality" bill when it looked like no one was interested. So I decided instead I would talk about something a little bit closer to home, namely the upcoming party president elections.

Lets forget Unity, ATO/PTO, and the mess elections have been lately. In a truly fair election, who would you pick? The person who has set goals, ambitions, and realistic expectations for a party, or the one who has run month after month, while claiming he's 100% democratic and accepting a party proposal to give him 100% control. Let's take a look at the options. There is nothing RGR can give AFA anymore. The best he has is reposting the same article every 5-10 days with yet another TV show reference. I hate to attack personal preference, but he sounds more like a teenage fan boy than a party leader. RGR is right about one thing, I bet there are in fact some real Americans in AFA, but sometimes it's hard to tell when you look at their congressional lists or party leadership. It's also hard to see what RGR's last real contribution to AFA was. Where are your new party programs, or the drive to push your militia above the 12th place? (For a comparison, the Feds new militia SHIELD is about three-four months old, and we're already above AFA's year old party military). Where are your party members, where are your party's accomplishments?

I'm not even using unity arguments, you're just a bad party leader. You claim to run a multinational party, but you let one nationality push your agenda. You claim to be for freedom, then accept "emergency powers". You claim to want the best for your party, and then do literally nothing for it every month. I'll admit, Free Area's sleeper cell was a pretty smart move, but you can't even take credit for that. Between begging for attention and begging for money, you still fail to accomplish something for your party. You also claim patriotism, and then root against your own country at war (which by the way, we won). RGR doesn't even care much for his party's well-being, he just continues to light matches while his house burns.

On the other hand, we have stewy. Someone who has promised to return meritocracy to AFA's congressional list. Someone who wants to actually give AFA a path to make instead of a person to follow. Someone who will actually talk about the issues instead of making his voice the only one heard. And lastly: Free elections. And not just for AFA, but with the intention to return the whole eUS to free elections once more. How about you actually face a real election RGR bravely like your fantasy heroes would. Often when security questions come up, Benjamin Franklin is gleefully quoted, but to suit our dear leader's tastes, I'll end this with a quote from something he's often more excited by.

“The man who fears losing has already lost.”

Vote stewy for AFA PP, he's applying.