Make War, Not Love?
PimpDollaz
Credits to the lovely Melissa Rose for the fabulous artwork
A hearty greeting once again to everyone out there whether you are a proletarian comrade or a capitalist swine. We all have one thing in common, we are fast becoming old in this desert of time wasting suckage. We squabble over pretend pixels like junkies fighting over the last clean spoon. Well, at least if things go bad, we don’t really lose anything right?
I ran for president a little while back on a non-war platform and subsequently got my butt handed to me by the bot army. Fancy the irony. I was rational and non controversial on purpose because I figured no one really wanted to suffer through an extended wipe yet again. Was I wrong? At the same time, I am constantly hearing rumblings that this place is way too boring to stick around for. I get that. This is essentially a war game at its core. Sure, you can adjust taxes, not write articles and one click some bread into your character, but the real meat and potatoes in here is clicking the big red fight button. Everything else is just window dressing. I’m not even sure that special events do much to enhance the user experience, like whatever silliness we have going on here on this, the fakest and most artificially commercial of all corporate contrived holidaze.
I probably shouldn’t make any presumptions either way, but I suspect that some people are happy just to remain undisturbed and farm in their training wars while others are firmly in the real war camp. What I do want to do is discover whether one attitude solidly prevails over the other, and which, or if there is an even split between the two. If you can leave your comments below indicating which war philosophy you would rather participate in, I would greatly appreciate that.
One of the miscalculations that previous CPs and CP candidates have made was to attack nations that are a lot stronger than we are. While this might be temporary fun, we could not possibly sustain that. It did, or certainly would lead to a retribution we could not work our way out of for a long time, possibly leading to more people leaving the game. Another mistake would be attacking a smaller nation that is aligned with strong allies or is otherwise in an alliance of sorts.
One possibility we can look for is to attack a similar or lower strength country that isn’t officially aligned with anyone. While it isn’t the most ethical thing to do, it will give us a more engaging change of pace than the usual wash, rinse, repeat of our current situation.
Or we could become more involved with our alliance and become a more active partner. Again, this could lead to more dicey situations for us, but the alternative is going back down the road to isolationism again. We’ve been there before and it’s not a good look. I suppose you can say that fake money is meant to be spent.
At any rate, this game has withered to the point of being an apotheosis of mindless mouse clicking repetitiveness. taking a wider view, there might not be much that we can do as the exodus is related to the state of the game and not specifically what we are or are not doing. But, we may be trapped in a cycle of sorts. Do bad decisions drive people away? Or are people leaving because of a lack of options?
So to summarize, I’d like your feedback on the following. If you could choose one of the four options:
A]
Given the possibility of an extended wipe, would you still prefer to see a real war campaign against a major enemy?
B]
Should we focus on staying in our lane alliance wise? For instance, being a support country and helping out where we can, although we can’t do much, damage wise.
C]
Stay the course and just use our regions to host other nations for TWs?
D]
Or venture out and try for a small war campaign of our own against a minor country to inject a bit more fun into an otherwise dead game?
As always, thanks for reading. Catch you next time.
Comments
I agree with so much you have written.
Hell everything actually.
This is probably one of the best,
....no it is the best CP Campaign article I have read in years.
Really an excellent piece. I love your in the face straight up style. That is some jaw crushing brass knuckle shit, for sure.
"Yeah, can you dig it?"
You are total OG Street PIMP.
You have my support all the way.
Hit me up on the corner, if you need some fucking backup.
I got your 6.
I see option B as our best choice:
. "Should we focus on staying in our lane alliance wise? For instance, being a support country and helping out where we can, although we can’t do much, damage wise.
Word would get out fast that we are ready to lay it out. We earn our cred.
.Then we go to A:
"Given the possibility of an extended wipe, would you still prefer to see a real war campaign against a major enemy?"
Because we all gotta die sooner or later.
Just do it fucking right.
Peace, out
o7
I am for Option E, a combination approach.
I favor keeping active training wars, though there is room for improvement over the current system.
I believe we should stay the course with CODE, supporting the goals of the alliance in ways that make sense while not hiding under a rock. We can and should support our allies by actively attacking enemies, but we need to get our organization back up and running before we can be truly effective.
This game truly is the biggest social experiments that I've ever be a part of 🙂 And I love it 😃
And it can be what ever we make it be, as each of us eCreates eWorld around us..
I will give my answer in a bit different way, how I see what eRep can offer, and how you can have nice time here 😉
E = enjoy the time spent here. For me this comes at 1st place. If this eWorld will ever become anything else, then I will put my eLight off 😉
R = respect. Respect other players, no matter where they are from. There are also some unwritten rules here, ask about them if you didn't catch them. Also can stand for research, connect, ask what is not clear. No matter where you are or for which country you play, every question has it's answer 😉
E = eliminate all ppl from your eFriends list that make insulting shouts, or which are not funny, interesting etc.. We all can choose who to eRead 😉 For me this brought much more positive Friends Wall 😉
P = publish article or two every now or then, comment if you like smth, or have idea how to improve something. Show to the community you are here, you are a RL person made of flesh and bones, and that you think with your own head 😃
U = understand, explore more how game works (at least parts that you favour the most). Ask, ask and ask what ever is not clear. And don't believe in every troll shout and comment 😃
B = be what you are. Better to be hated for what you are, than loved for something that you are not 😉
L = learn about what ever interests you. eRep is actually a great source of various information, so many cultures, languages, interesting articles. Check out great DB if you like to read or want to remember: www.tinyurl.com/eRepArticlesDB
I = Install Telegram 😃 For all those still not using Telegram as additional communication tool, I would warmly recommended it. Big part of the game is actually played there 😉 on eTelegrampublik 😃
K = Kiss to you all for reading my long comment 😘
And also a big hug if you help me on my quest to prove there are more than 1000 active players out here 😃 596 atm, so only 404 to go 😉
https://www.erepublik.com/en/main/newspaper/samo-pozitivno-325722/1
Short comm version:
Enjoy, respect, ask, install Telegram, subscribe 😃
❤ is in the ✈
🐰7
Ps. After proving I'm not a roBot, s148 to your newspapers 😉
And tnx for this great article, great read, and hope more will write their thoughts 😉
this is a great answer to this article. Awesome
Yeah Rabbit is a cool people.
huszonot o7
Sal
V+s
B and maybe D. I think people are slowly leaving because they are bored but will leave in droves if we get wiped. We need something that is going to give people a reason to sign on and do something more than two click.
what Shiloh said
Fortune favors the bold ^__^ I agree with this article, for this game to be worth playing we have to make it so
(being said, I have basically never fought in my elife)
I am sick of training wars that only benefit the few. Give me something to stand for, give me something to cheer on. Give me something to fight for. Whether it is a small nation war, greater alliance participation or full on brutal war, I will take nearly anything.
most players want to win the whole time. the smaller you are the less organized you are in battles so guess that is why most resort to bot armies as it is easier to control than normal players i have never seen the need and think it is better just to follow dudeism and to allow people to play the game at their own pace . this is so in all online games.
The Ministry of Love supports this article.
A well balanced mix of B and C is the best options imho. Long wipe is the main reason that drove lots of players away 18 months ago...
[removed]
I declare war. Muhahaha.
o7
good article and an interesting analysis on the current state of the game.
(and of e-USA too, in a more vague way)
well, first of all, my war philosophy in the game is to peacefully work+train, do my 2 clicking, and to be active in my e-country's politics field and in my newspaper, writting articles on a semi-active basis.
other than that, i prefer to fight sporadically, on some TW's and on various foreign battles at distant e-countries.
(so, in a way, im in the game more for the other, non-war aspects of the game (politics, articles, quests, etc etc , than to the war-part of the game itself.)
as for what strategies are the best/worst for your e-country, i personally believe that the WORST mistake that one CP/player can do is to attack nations that are a lot stronger than yours... its a recipe for distaster, and you will get your e-country wiped out ASAP.
and no regions=no congress, no state and not organization. and people will be mad at you (and for good reason too!)
likewise, it would be foolish to attack a weak/weaker e-country that is part of a POWERFUL alliance.
its as if you are inviting them at your doorstep, asking them boldly to wipe out your country's regions.
however from your A,B,C,D, choices, i believe that the wisest options would be B + C.
B is good, because that way, you will try to focus on getting more involved with your alliance and becoming a more active partner. (and as such, not only strengthening your alliance as a whole, but also strengthening your position withitn the alliance, and making your e-country a vital part of the group.
(which means, getting more protection from your alliance's friends/allies/comrades, and in having a more active+fun lifestyle in the upcoming big battles, which would be a win-win for any player who likes the war module part of the game).
option C is also good, because it allows for your country to focus on the much safer path of the TW's.
and training wars are just like the ''friendly matches'' on football/other sports: it is made for fun, and noone loses or wins something important.
no losses, no gains.
(but alot of fun in between!).
ofcourse, your the people in your e-country are TRULY bored, then they could also follow option D, and to start a small war campaign of your own, against a weaker/weak country (with no strong allies, nor with any ties to a strong alliance).
that way, you will have a safe path of fun, as you will crush a smaller, weaker e-country.
(but you should have the good sportsmanship to at least leave them 1-2 core regions for them to have a congress/state, in the very least).
what can i say? the final choice of any e-country's actions belong to its citizens/players and to the ruling party+CP of it, so i guess that its their choice to take, and the results will be what they will probably get out of it, dependind on the wiseness (or silliness) of their decision.
anyway, good article, and nice questions+remarks.
it was an interesting read.
keep it up!
on a shorter notice, i believe that this game would've been MUCH better if they would've adde😛
-more quests+missions of varying difficulty (easy, moderate, hard), and with equally matching rewards.
(small, moderate, big).
also, more quests, would incite more actions+more fights+more friendly competition (or cooperation in some cases...)
either way, it would bring more activity in the game, and thats always a good thing.
(also they should add more new medals for each quest/mission/achievement completed or so, that would be cool too. the gamers would love to earn more new medals+achievements too)
-they should add more seasonal events in the game, (new halloween/xmas/easter quests+missions/events)
(as they did in the past)
but also, they should add a few more new e-countries to the game.
(such as san marino, andorra, monaco, mongolia, kazakhstan, etc etc)
there are many choices to add, and this would spark a new burst of activity in the game, as for who will ''settle'' in each recently added e-country.
-they could also add a ''space race'' feature in the game, where e-countries get funds+materials (and energy too), in order to craft their own space station/spaceship, and to launch it into the moon, in order to get some region bonuses from its regions, which would incite an ''arms race'' between our e-countries, which could easily revive this game with a new element of action and conflict.
furthermore, apart from conquering regions from the e-moon, we could have missions on mars, neptune, pluto, etc etc
the list could go on and on.
there are so many options+new things to add in the game, and those new changes would make this already good game, even better!
thats why i always suggest those things to them, and/or in my articles too.
and this concludes my extra post.
cheers