How Do You Want Your Government Run?
Imperial Sun Party
Writing to you from Imperial Sun Party Headquarters in Neo-Tokyo, Kanto Region
How do you want your government run?
I will attempt to match in substance Reiji Mitsurugi's article in the Ashigaru Taisho what I lack in his rhetorical flourish! Not that his articles are not substantial--they are!--but on the eve of congressional elections, I bring to the reader and electorate of eJapan a text on how this government is run.
Many of you are familiar with the intricacies of the government mechanics in eRepublik, but many of you are not. Among their duties, congress makes laws that do things like set tax rates, donate money from the treasury to organizations or citizens, and vote to declare war. The President can declare wars and form alliances, but the congress must approve them. In eJapan, our government passed a constitution that delegated most powers to the congress. Cabinet members, usually appointed by the president, help the president run the country. The Defense Minister runs the military orgs and uses funding donated by the treasury to purchase weapons and equipment, the National Bank of Japan uses funding to control the price of the JPY on the Monetary Markets, the Japanese Interior Service operates the training companies and gifts citizens who have low wellness. There is no way the President could do it all! However, there is no "in-game mechanic" for removing cabinet members, only for impeaching the president which requires a YES vote of 66% of congress. Thus, the unelected members of the cabinet wield considerable power. They have the passwords to the organizations and control the money.
The National Bank of eJapan, located in Nihonbashi, the heart of Neo-Tokyo
Take the example of the Theocrats and their totalitarian grip on eSouth Korea, enforced through one of the most repressive tax structures in eRepublik. Income and VAT tax rates of 50% in all major industries ensures that the government gets HALF OF EVERY TRANSACTION. How would you like to run a business there? You wouldn't, of course, unless you were a Theocrat, receiving donations directly from the national treasury:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/South-Korea/law/16311
http://www.erepublik.com/en/South-Korea/law/16444
http://www.erepublik.com/en/South-Korea/law/16795
http://www.erepublik.com/en/South-Korea/law/16719
All massive donations to the Theocratic Holy Pantheon, an organization that turns around and donates that money on to other organizations in the sprawling Theocratic monolith. A perfect little totalitarian cabal.
Just ask any of the eSouth Koreans--Yonai Keiko, Spade, etc.--what life in eSouth Korea meant for them as non-Theocrats.
Of course, we eJapanese reject this, choosing a more democratic form of government. Our elected officials agree to hold public debates (http://nipponblog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=884) about how the money is spent. Congress even votes on it, and you--the voter--get to decide who represents you in congress, that is, who makes that vote. In fact, a lot of elections are won by a single vote or even ties, meaning your one vote can have a lot of influence. Since gold in the National Treasury can only be used to print money, declare war, or form alliances and JPY not at all, money and Gold in the National Treasury is basically useless until congress votes to move it. Each month, we do propose real donations (not to be confused with those at the end of the month for gaining experience points) so we can use the money. And before we vote, we always discuss where the money is to go before proposing the in-game vote in order to prevent any sneaky proposals from going to a rogue organiation like the Nationa1 Bank of Japan (it has happened before many times in other countries).
Now I am not suggesting that this donation proposal from two weeks ago--shortly after President Oraizan's election--was anything sinister or Theocratic in nature. If I had believed so, the eJapanese electorate can be certain that I would have made a big deal about it right away. But the member of congress who proposed the donation (You won't need three guesses to figure out who it was...) has a history of making unannounced proposals, ironically a practice decried by the same proposer months earlier.
As explanation to the congress for the proposal, Director of the Board of Economics (established by the new President Oraizan), Lauri Mursu, posted this in the national forums:
http://nipponblog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=912
It basically indicated AFTER the in-game proposal was made and 24 hour vote clock clicking away that the donation would be made available to the various cabinet organizations "as necessary." Since the proposal was for 30000JPY (about 1000 gold at current exchage rates), an amount unprecedented in the history of eJapan, it emptied out the treasury, rendering all further congressional funding proposals impotent without the consent of the whoever holds the National Bank of Japan organization's password. So the military has to wait for bankers to come and bring the money instead of receiving it from congressional donation proposals.
I trust Lauri Mursu and Oraizan, of course, and when I asked for the money that congress unanimously approved in its Defense Spending VOTE (http://nipponblog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=906), they agreed to provide some of it, indicating that more could be donated as necessary. Receiving the funding necessary to run the JIA and not wishing to raise a controversy early in a new president's term, I let the issue drop. However, as far as I know, the Japanese Imperial Navy has still not received the funding that the congress approved two weeks ago.
The writer notes that Congress did vote to approve the donation 27-9, but I suspect that a pre-vote discussion would have changed many of their minds. I hope that congress will consider proposals--and their proposers--more carefully before casting their vote. All in all, there is no great threat here as long as scrutiny remains high, but we must ensure that we remain vigilant.
Remember that annoying political party van blaring slogans that woke you up at 8am?
So why bring this up NOW? If you're still reading all this and have not yet fallen asleep, I will write it clearly for you, so you can vote this article up and get the national debate going! On the eve of congressional elections, I ask that voters consider this executive v. legislative balance of power issue. While a bit more subtle than a "THEOCRATS BAD" campaign (I fired the campaign marketing advisor who recommended that slogan ha ha), this is a very important issue. Congress should retain the right of determining donations which can be discussed before proposed. I advocated this long before the Imperial Sun Party became the strongest party in the eJapanese Diet, and I would advocate this even if we were no longer the strongest. These checks and balances are good for our eRepublik.
KITA Ikki
Imperial Sun Party President
Comments
How do I want my govt run? - Well done please 😛
Very informative article btw. Please carry on!
That the executive branch did not provide the Army and Navy with its budget, unanimously approved by the elected representatives of the people is unacceptable. This must be rectified immediately. I'm disappointed in myself for being unaware of the matter until now.
"More as necessary" is not what the Diet voted for, and it's not what the people or the army will stand for.
I agree, the checks and balances system is critical and plays an extremely enormous role in a democracy.It is crucial to retain such a system because it promotes a just and a fair government. Additionally, we will hopefully have some sort of "official" cabinet system implemented in eRepublik to improve the efficiency of our governments. Furthermore, Congress SHOULD retain the right of determining donations or the Executive branch becomes too powerful. The congress should keep the executive branch in check, so-to-speak. The National Bank of Japan and the executive branch should not override the Congress's vote and will and have a duty to provide the full amount proposed by Congress. An executive branch controlling the funds and the final say will most likely destroy the fair and just government we had and will continue to do so until this is fixed.
The power of the purse (budget) it to be with the people (congress). That is a foundation of the democratic idea. Without it congress is merely a bunch of people playing democracy in suits and in a fancy room (the EU parliament in RL lol). Under no circumstance can the executive branch control this.
As for the idea of an invincible cabinet, I would like to see Cabinet members subject to removal just like the president (with a 66% vote). All public officials need to be able to be held accountable by their citizen (that includes congress).
While “in-game” systems do not offer the chance for many vital political checks and balances, as well as numerous other things, that does not mean that Japan cannot hold itself to a higher level and standard for all who call it home. If we do not then we are no better off that the Theocrats using their people as the grease in their money making machine.
So this election, STEP UP JAPAN and vote for those who stand on the pillars of Democracy and Freedom, a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. (thats how i want my government run)
Voted!
Kenji, according to our constitution, cabinet members can be recalled by that same 66% vote. But, since there is no game mechanic for cabinet member sat all, so too is there no game mechanic for their removal.
Ultimately, it all falls with who will respect the will of the people.
This is actually a pretty serious issue. I'm kind of shocked that this is the first major exposure I've seen on it, while many in our Congress bicker over basically nothing. Shocking.
Very sharp indeed.
This donation was suspicious to me. Therefore, I voted against it.
Hm...
Voted.
I have always fought for the supremacy of Congress.
Technically, Congress has control of budget. Except Congress democratically decided to grant the money to the executive branch so that they can do their stuff. It's really in no place for congress to complain after they have approved the transaction, since they approved the measure to relocate the funding to executive branch under their control. Congress has complete control of National purse in the treasury.
/
Now it isn't executive government's fault that Congress has moved much of those money out of their control into executive branch budget. You really can't cry foul, after you give your money away for free without any string attached to it. It was congress decision to do so anyways. If you want to have complete control keep the money where you can control it. Simple as that.
Akki, you are very cynical. There was a voting in progress
on the defense budget in the forum. And then you proposed - without discussion - to be transferred everything to the National Bank.
Voted. Cabinet members, like Congressman, need to be held accountable for their actions or inactions in regards to a situation such of magnitude of this one.
@Koppanyi: I was only asked by Mursu, the head of Economic Board to propose such proposal. If you want to blame someone, blame those who voted yes on the proposal Koppayi. What congress does with their vote, is congress's responcibility.
Oh man that is so cool
Forget "THEOCRATS BAD" campaign. You would get more votes with "AKKI BAD" campaign!
Japan needs an intelligence agency to monitor outside belligerents (Theocrats for example).
You're a funny guy, Akki. It's funny that you made a move that was pretty intentionally deceptive, and put the blame on Congress. Ah well though, it's to be expected from you.
It's concerning that the MoD still has not received the full money that was voted on by Congress. Very concerning. This goes back to issues of limits on executive power. The vote was held, ALL of the money needs to be appropriated, right now. Absolutely unconscionable. I'm sure everyone involved in stalling the funding on the military has some excuse, it's always something.
What's funny is that it is order by the Vice President and Chief head of the Economic board, and you only still have same campaign slogan Crawling chaos. You can only get so much with campain slogan older than your citizen.
order of the Vice President? What authority do they have over the issue? And aren't you the one who just made a big stink over how we should not abide by rules outside of game mechanics, yet now you're taking orders from a made up cabinet position of questionable authority? Stop to lie, Akki. At least have the courage of your convictions and be honest about your actions rather than hiding behind half thought poorly worded lies.
I don't know what you're talking about, campaign slogan. You never do make much sense, though.
I agree with Peter...
"What's funny is that it is order by the Vice President and Chief head of the Economic board"
Uhhh, Mursu is not Vice President.
"Transfering 6000 to JIA, 4000 to JIN and keeping the rest (around 150g) at bank as reserve"
Moved the funds now according to this plan at the forums.
Firstly: I asked the mandate from the president to do the move instantly to safeguard the money at country accounts, then I decided that I shouldn't use my last proposal for the move and Akki was the one who had a proposal and was online at that time (He wasn't even the first one that I asked to do this, I think it was Sophia Forrester, must check my irc logs thou, but there was still an existing donation vote so she couldn't start it).
I tbh find this article and the fuss raised by it very troublesome. The MoD decides to rather write an article about the matter than ask the president or MoF (Head of Economic Board) about the money? Pathetic. Minister KITA_Ikki has not contacted me at all about the JIA money after the proposal passed, there was still some talks about the money, how much to trasfer and where, during the proposal was voted so I wasn't sure what MoD actually wanted. Also I've seen that both JIA and JIN still having money left at their orgs, so I didn't do anything.
I can be blamed for a portion of this mess as I haven't donated the money instantly after the proposal passed, but I will not take the whole blame. Minister Kita Ikki has been totally uncooperative with this matter by not asking why he hasn't received the money (hell, I haven't seen the MoD online at cabinet irc for ages), and has instead decided that a public article is better. Too bad he apparently decided to start his campaign for presidency with partly false accusations as he hasn’t actually been interested about defense money either. 😛
-Mursu, MoFA and MoF of Japan
That's weird. Nothing here or anywhere mentions Kita for president.
Reiji, nobody has said so, but as ppl are making assumptions and playing with words, so can I.
When you take it upon yourself to remove funds from the control of congress, you assume the responsibility of ensuring that the money is distributed correctly. Trying to push the blame anywhere but on yourself is pathetic.
I particularly like this: "Minister Kita Ikki has been totally uncooperative with this matter by not asking why he hasn't received the money"
It's superbly funny. Translation: The congress needs to beg repeatedly, like children, to get access to the country funds, even after a lawful vote has passed.
http://www.nipponblog.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=12181#p12181" target="_blank">http://www.nipponblog.net/forum/viewtopi[..]12181
el oh el...
Voted...