Does hurting your enemy's economy in a global market not hurt yourself?
Day 4,039, 02:56
•
Published in Ireland 
•
by
•
by Releasethe Krakken
Cutting of your nose to spite your face!
Lets establish some facts.
Fact ONE
In the USA there is in 2 resources a double layer of full bonuses.
Food and WRM.
Fact TWO
We have a global economy and a player can establish a holding company in any country.
Fact Three
Past a certain threshold of factories which is required to establish a decent holding company in say food production a full bonus region is the best region as it can in the scenario where the country have full bonuses in say food never drop below 193% whilst it will in areas with less than full bonuses drop below 193%
Fact Four
The cost of production is a constant it does not fluctuate when you earn lower bonuses. Therefore one places a certain holding company requiring alot of factories to achieve a certain production in full bonus regions.
Your income is lower if you place it in lesser regions.
Fact FIVE
The USA was a low conflict region and many big countries like Serbia due to Dio Maximus had sh* bonuses. Dio Maximus basically slept through the whole event and only constructively did something when most of the high end resources where already claimed and could no longer be established in Serbia.
Lets take a rl example it is said that the tariffs that the USA imposes on China is paid by the USA consumer.
It is not an ideal comparison as of course if there is USA producers of the same product because the tariffs is added to the price of the product it makes US products more competitive.
So even if you hurt a enemy of ours like say Romania by sabotaging their production you mostly hurt yourself as most irish producers would have a holding company in areas now occupied by the enemy.
Lets establish some facts.
Fact ONE
In the USA there is in 2 resources a double layer of full bonuses.
Food and WRM.
Fact TWO
We have a global economy and a player can establish a holding company in any country.
Fact Three
Past a certain threshold of factories which is required to establish a decent holding company in say food production a full bonus region is the best region as it can in the scenario where the country have full bonuses in say food never drop below 193% whilst it will in areas with less than full bonuses drop below 193%
Fact Four
The cost of production is a constant it does not fluctuate when you earn lower bonuses. Therefore one places a certain holding company requiring alot of factories to achieve a certain production in full bonus regions.
Your income is lower if you place it in lesser regions.
Fact FIVE
The USA was a low conflict region and many big countries like Serbia due to Dio Maximus had sh* bonuses. Dio Maximus basically slept through the whole event and only constructively did something when most of the high end resources where already claimed and could no longer be established in Serbia.
Lets take a rl example it is said that the tariffs that the USA imposes on China is paid by the USA consumer.
It is not an ideal comparison as of course if there is USA producers of the same product because the tariffs is added to the price of the product it makes US products more competitive.
So even if you hurt a enemy of ours like say Romania by sabotaging their production you mostly hurt yourself as most irish producers would have a holding company in areas now occupied by the enemy.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
interesting....
Or in short...farmville, just more complicated.
actually farmville involved a lot more schlep had a massive farm there as well and even one in the game farmville was based off. military module is more farmville as you click a single button multiple times.
Voted.
Yes, it does.
But in war, the one willing to lose more will be victorious.
no ... that is a silly anecdote at most. if say mexico decide to attack the usa in rl and decide to sacrifice everything they have including every living mexican. will they be successful?
They will inherit the kingdom of Heaven so I'd say so, yes.
illuminati report 15677: member 3456 will built a wall between mexico and the usa. in his second term he will extend the wall around whole of mexico but not the coast leaving a thin stroke of land that will swear allegiance to the usa and will include all good holiday destinations. key tequila producing areas will declare themselves an independent country called Aquila without tequila the inhabitants of mexico will have to resort to marijuana and become docile and easily controllable.