Demographics of the Alliances with the new Divisions
•
by Varia.
In this article I analyze the demographics in eRepublik, with the new divisions system.
The data was collect from egov, in the day 27 of February of 2014, about eDay 2290.
As we know, in a round each division has its own battle. The points in the table have the percentage in the right, so that we can get the full image of the importance of each division.
In this table we can see the population of eRepublik, according to egov.
First thoughts are that Division 1 contributes with 9% for each round and the amount of players there corresponds to 62% of Total. So it’s almost 2/3 of all players fighting for less than 1/10 of the total amount of points.
In the opposite side, Division 4 contributes with 45% for each round and the amount of players there corresponds to 5% of Total. Meaning, that almost half of the amount of points in a round is decided by 1/20 of all the players in eRepublik.
In the tables below eW% represents the percentage of that country population by comparison to the total amount in eRepublik. The Divisions percentage is in comparison with the eRepublik total for that particular division.
eC% gives the weight that each Division have in that country.
Pro-Asteria countries
Pro-Sirius countries
There’s plenty of data to analyze, I only want to get your attention that countries with older communities end up being extremely favored.
Take the example of Poland. With 6% the number of players in all eRepublik, they have 10,6% of Division 4 total amount of players.
For sure, they have some players there just for the bonus, but if you see other countries like Serbia, Greece, Romania, Slovenia, USA, Croatia, etc., these old communities are extremely favored by comparison with countries that had baby booms in recent years. Like the cases of Argentina, Colombia, Portugal, RoC, Ukraine, etc.
This means that if a small country wants to have any impact in eRepublik, and with effort achieve a great baby boom right now, if all remains the same, only by 2020 they will balance the battles with the arrival of these players in Division 4 (this corresponds to a bit more than an average of 100xp a day). This is if Plato doesn’t change the Divisions until that time comes, favoring the older communities again.
P.S.: I included in LETO Bolivia, Uruguay, Canada and France. These are LETO countries, not mattering to me that formally they aren’t right now.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
v3 Pole!! 😃
excelent!! good job!
P.S.: I included in LETO Bolivia, Uruguay, Canada and France. These are LETO countries, not mattering to me that formally they aren’t right now.
true !
V
Good job!
Good article
Votado
"P.S.: I included in LETO Bolivia, Uruguay, Canada and France. These are LETO countries, not mattering to me that formally they aren’t right now."
Votado
Great article, voted mate o/
Nice read, voted and shouted o7
great stuff
but where is Ireland under the pro sirus group? Your numbers will be greatly affected without Ireland's 1 or 2 division 4 fighters lol
I didn't had Ireland because I follow this pro-Sirius article:
http://www.erepublik.com/pt/article/sirius-introduces-prosirius--2377831/1/20
I don't see Chile, Bulgaria etc. in that article yet they are under pro sirus column 😮
brr. Ok, I will add Ireland and China
Serbia is so well balanced now xD
please change F....M to Macedonia... I don't live in the country with those stupid reference... I'm Macedonian and live in Macedonia... Most precisely - in the north part of Macedonia... the other 2 parts are still occupied by Bulgaria and Greece...
you will live where Plato tells you to live 😛
if Plato tells you to jump in a river, would you jump ??? I will not...
done
thanks...
I dont know why you mind the name fyrom??
Its just former yugoslavian republic of Macedonia.
You are a former yugoslavian republic and you claim you are Macedonia so whats the problem ?
Its like when you want to introduce Mike Tyson and you say former champion of the world Mike Tyson.. You dont see him getting mad about it..
then - you live in FYROS... 😉
it is as same as you don't like the fact that kosova is no longer part of serbia...there is kosovo country with its own government, law and population, but you still claim that it is heart of serbia...So far, kosovo is part of serbia as much as Solun is part of FYROM ..
Isto e ama ne e isto .
So Serbia having teritorial issues regarding Kosovo relates to FYROM's name issues.. how exactly?
Its one thing if you claimed Thesaloniki is a part of FYROM but its completely another thing claiming you are not Former Yugoslavian republic of Macedonia..
Since you are former Yugoslavian Republic of Macedonia (FYROM). I know it and its a fact ( I remmember it wasnt that long ago)
ne seri
\O/
v
Just numbers...
Reality is the opposite.
Pro Asteria bloc is stronger.
The reality is that they have to recalculate the div4 and 3 that controls Greek cabine 🙂
Hail LETO
v+S
nice article and good luck
You should of done a separate 1 for Aurora!
Can u give the article with the foundation of Aurora? I cannot find it 🙁
And ABC alliance I mean come on you have Asgard and Leto there, do a proper job!
Aurora and ABC aren't official alliances. If you want, you can do your own article. Go do all the research work and good luck!
o7
Well I am to lazy to that! 😛
Oh and Russia is still aligned with Asgard and were neutral in Macedonia-Scandinavia wars.
v
nice article
Voted!!!
😉
votado
V!
Perfect balance :/
BOOM BOOM BADOOM
Votado y Suscrito.
Buen artículo.
o/
who the hell is macedonia??????
According to the map is a part of Ellas!!!
It must hurt you so badly when you see the name Macedonia every day after day after day! 😛
[removed]
Even if you write it hunted times this always stays the same.
http://prntscr.com/2wjgu3
adorei a frase final XD
v
As usual great analysis. We all know that eGov is not perfect but is still the best source of info available.
1 - I believe the comment regarding nº players vs influence points its very important and Admins should consider. I understand the need to create a more selective D4 division, since in the past D4 were the double of any other division. Probably we went a bit too far on the change but it was a change because Erep wants this change to last for some time, but continue in the old division was also sub-optimal.
But if you create a process were older player get a new advantage you need to correct the bonus points that provided the previous advantage to D4 players. I am not saying that D4 should have the same points as D1 but 5 times D1 also does not make sense.
2 - I do believe that Aurora will not be only a Pro-Sirius alliance, it will be a Pro-Aurora alliance, with countries like Mexico very close to the Sirius block but the support of the big guns like Bulgaria and Chile will be selective. This could shift the balance between Sirius and Asteria depending on the region you are fighting. For instances, will Bulgaria and Russia fight for Poland ? or Chile for Spain ? we will see.
3 - The split of damage makes it quite evident how wrong is the charter of Asteria. Asteria is being created based on TWO format with the large countries above controlling what the smaller countries should do, without giving them the chance to strongly participate in the decision making. This is a structure of an alliance who wants to attack, the difference is... TWO + pro-TWO had 70% of the damage. Asteria has 45%. That is a big difference.
Its true that Asteria is being smarter than EDEN was when dealing with Aurora countries but any aggressive strategy will just push Aurora closer to Sirius, only a very careful aggressive strategy will not have that implication. The focus of Asteria should be to consolidate their support in medium sized countries and they are doing a bad job.