Far Left Politics and Libertarianism
taytaz
For many, images of the far left bring to mind the horrors of the latter part of the USSR, the totalitarian regimes seen in China, and the indiscriminate killing in South America. In fact, it is not uncommon for the average person to form a unfavourable opinion of this type of politics from these experiences, however, this does not have to be the case. Usually, a person is classified using a compass, with left and right indicating economic/social stance (government industry vs. Private Industry) and the Up-Down axis representing their personal Social beleifs regarding civil and individual liberties.
When we comprehend this, we can see that most dictators are obviously very Totalitarian. Hitler was a far-right wing totalitarian, with Stalin his Left-Wing counterpart, not opposite. Both manifestations of totalitarianism often let their beleifs and view be clouded by cruelties involving and over-bearing military, secret police and in the end, corruption.
When we investigate different forms of far-left politics, we see that an authoritarian approach is not the only option. In fact, the left wing is famed for its movements for liberty from the French Revolution, to the Feminist Movement even to the peaceful Indian Independence movement. Far-Left politics, then, by definition, can be libertarian.
A pure Marxist will advocate to you something more like anarchism, which is very hard to achieve in modern society, as not everybody will always do exactly as they are meant to. Using the analogy of a school, not every pupil is always on time, so many schools have guards/sergeants/supervisers to ensure order.
This is much like the type of politics many Far-Left supporters would advocate, somewhere in between the total reliance on goodness of anarchy, but well away from the Totalitarian and violent regimes elsewhere. One of the main aims of Communism is a 'liberation' of sorts, liberating those less fortunate from the shackles of society, and promoting equality. I beleive, that if handled appropriately, such a system would significantly raise the average quality of life, and look beyond individual profit.
So, watch this space in the near future for new announcements about the development of the Communist Movement in Australia.
Comments
PERTAMAX BLOCKER
Voted
Nice article. Voted.
Voted. So would you say we're like Trotskyites?
yeah, but without getting assassinate with icepicks 😛
lol. That's actually a pretty funny story.
funny!
hmmm....
ice pick in the head...
Good article, and voted Taytaz, but I have one major point of disagreement: "Hitler was a far-right wing totalitarian"
Hitler was actually pretty spot on centre when it comes to the economy, with a preference for the left, although he used the right to his advantage (and economically he was probably the most successful leder in history) 'Nazi' is short for National Socialist German Workers' Party. Hitler was as anti-capitalist as he was anti-communist and antisemitic.
Volkswagen is a prime example - the peoples' car, a company founded and owned by the government to provide affordable cars for everyone.
Exactly my point as well xD
his totalitarianism completely overode his actualy beleifs...
but wasn't he fascist...really, he wasn't known for his economic policies at all
Volkswagon, he forced labour then charged for those cars....Hitler was probably a bad example
Also, he was an environmentalist.
aaaggghhh 😛
Yes, it's a shame. If Hitler hadn't murdered so many people, his economic achievements might be better remembered.
He disliked democracy too, but then so did most Germans of the time. They were happy to be ruled by a monarch, and democracy was forced upon them at the treaty of Versailles. It has been argued that Hitler's social policies were a natural course for German politics to take.
It's been a while since i've read "Das Kapital" and I resonated with a lot of what Marx was saying in it. The problem I discovered down the track was that didn't fully take in too account (if I can use a religious term, which seems pertinent) SIN. Or the Self Indulgent Nature "SIN" of humanity.
On the whole Nazi (NSDAP) thing. The Strasser brothers are interesting to look at as they were more on the socialist side of the NSDAP. Have a read, they are no saints by any stretch of the imagination, but still interesting.
On a different note if the Australian Nation Party & the Australian democratic socialist party merged they could form the National Socialist Democratic Australia Party (NSDAP). 😛 LOL!
voted, subscribed, enjoyed.
Nice work taytaz 😃
Economic Liberty? What exactly is that?
You say communism promotes a liberation of some sorts yet you have to work for the government for the wages they decide, and the prices they decide to sell things for; how can you consider this greater liberation than a free market? (considering that this is a game with 3 parts, politics, war and ecconomy, nothing else)
All that in mind though, very nice article Taytaz.
So , would you consider election bombing the AAA totalitarian ?
Bilbarus
no
definitely not
the AAA in itself is a party born of a take-over, and nobody voiced objection to it except 1 inactive member...
so no
as for economic liberty:
1. Does EVERYBODY have the same liberties, i mean, only a select few have the power to make a profit from the labours of others
Everyone has the right to earn a living , based upon how much effort they put into making a living . ( no free lunch )
Bilbarus
exactly
"from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
Thank you Taytaz . I invest of my time and my resourses , and I should recive the fruits of my labors , to do with as I please .
Bilbarus
Thank you , Taytaz . I invest my time and my resources into making a living ,I receive the fruits of my labors . To do with as I please .
Bilbarus
yes
correct...
...?
?
why taytaz, your a modern day robbin hood 😛
Ur confusing me
!!!
Robin hood is silly, he participated as an aristocrat and was fuellrd by powerlust!
"Also, he was an environmentalist."
The dude did plant a lot of trees.
ANARCHY
confidence in oneself, faith in fellow anarchists, and belief in the rest... Communism is inevitable.
@ Bilbarus and taytaz
I would like to believe that an unconditional support for those who are not working will only encourage them to through demonstration, as only you can judge your own fitness and I will judge mine.
Play first, and see how much work there is to do. 😉
@ Alte Altus
If Hitler hadn't murdered so many people, I'm not sure his economic achievements might even happened.
He'd not have seized Jewish properties and have got 'concentrated' free labor.
The 'Socialist' name in the Nazi party was pure marketting, trying to pull people who may be slightly keen on the Commies to vote for the Nazis.
As for the economy, everyone was acting left at the time, Keynsianism rocks pretty hard. Nationalisation and government spending was the easiest way to pull countries out of the depression, and Germany was hit harder than most countries.
Nice article Taytaz
yeah, i hate how all the evils of that period used Socialism and Communism as marketting
like the Chinese
and obviously Stalin
Burn the commies! haha
yes but socialism and communism both try and change human nature. it is supposed to be in classes that way people strive to aim high except in socialiasm everyone awarded same even people who work hard get same wage as peole who don't.
the ideals of each/both have been exploited but, the the ideals and proposed systems are not strategies for exploitation.
@ taytaz "1 inactive member" what d???
Hmmmmm Communist party you say? Well I'm just visiting from the US at the moment as part of a tour of the world, but if this party of yours gets going and gets some success here in Australia I might move here for good.
Bluebottle:
Sorry!
I meant active 😛
@ Guy Baumber: Human nature is an easy cop out. Human nature, as we know it today, is almost entirely cultural. People aren't naturally greedy, look at most pre-modern civilisations, it's been instilled in us after 200 years of capitalism.
yeah, to say that it is Human Nature to have inequality...well, its just incorrect
All society labours to make the social product, but only the owners take the profits, and decide how to invest it. Is that freedom?
No, it's not freedom at all. I still fail to comprehend how people can call capitalism fair when the ones who make the most money are the ones who exploit their human beings the most, or how being tied to your next wage packet, having to make your next mortgage payment or face repossession of your home - I don't get how that is freedom either.
What will the stance be on the environment? How will the party's internal structure be governed - consensus, while good in theory can also be quite problematic and lead to inaction.
I think that pooling the resources of players together, along with the government to develop strong industry to compete in international markets is the way forward. Can the government even buy companies? Can the government set up a holding corporation that contains members of the state. People are encouraged to invest in the company where they can. Work at the companies and enable the creation of many great things...