The Nationalist Party FAQs
•
by Nathan Woods
Ever wondered about the Nationalists?
Where here are you answers and more. 🙂
**What do you believe**
I think the manifesto best sums it up.
Mission Statement:
We believe in making the United States the greatest place to live in the world. Providing a strong army, and supporting them. Taking care of the working man, and equal opportunity for all people.
Preamble:
The Nationalist Party believes in a government that is transparent. All political dealings will be publicized. If one of our own is wrong, we will point this out. We support small yet strong and reliable government that is established through branches to deal with pressing issues and in maintaining the United States of America. At the same time, government should be readily open to participation and communication from the every day citizen. We believe in active participation at all levels of government. It is the responsibility of congressmen/women and political parties to contribute to and aid the efforts of the Federal government. The ultimate goal of government should be to help the people and ensure their economic success, as well as safety.
**Who are the founders**
The founders are myself, Kyle321n, and William Shafer.
**What do I do after I join**
Join our forums and IRC channel, #us-np.
To get to IRC go to [url=http://http://www.rizon.net/chat.phpahref=http://http://www.rizon.net/chat.php]http://www.rizon.net/chat.php[/url]
After that replace the name "change_me."
Then type in /join #us-np and / join #us if you would like to join the United States channel.
**Where are your forums**
Either go to this site: http://grou.ps/ramrod/home
Or you can go to our party page, then click the two conjoining bubbles at the top of the page.
**Why should I join**
~ We are a extremely active party, even owning our own IRC, that has members in it constantly.
~ We have two representatives in Congress
~ We are the fastest growing party in the United States, today being our eighth day of existence.
~ Our awesome manifesto. (It's still in early stages, and we are open to adding to it.)
~ We are in an alliance with the Federalist Party and Green Party.
~ We want to give everyone a fair voice, and in the forum, I even have a PP advisory cabinet, if there is anything you would like to suggest, or if there is a current issue we need to discuss.
~ We support the army.
**Are you imperialist**
Our militant stances are not as aggressive as said by everyone, although more than usual. We do not support attacking innocent nations just to attack. We only attack nations that have attacked the United States or her allies, just take it a step further, saying we also believe that it would then be okay to invade their territory. We do NOT support attacking nations for land. Even, if possible, we would be okay with giving the nation their land back after a peace agreement has been made.
**Where is you manifesto**
The most current one is found here: http://grou.ps/ramrod/blogs
So go ahead, come and join us.
Facebook
Twitter
Discord
Comments
**Why should I join**
~ We are a extremely active party, even owning our own IRC, that has members in it constantly.
--- LOL, almost every party in the top 10 has their own IRC! LMAO!
At least the USWP has at least 2 members in it at a time!
~ We have two representatives in Congress
--- goood.... job..? We have 34% of congress.. LOL
~ We are the fastest growing party in the United States, today being our eighth day of existence.
--- the AAP is doing a much better job at recruiting active citizens.
~ Our awesome manifesto. (It's still in early stages, and we are open to adding to it.)
--- awesome!?! AWESOME!?! IT'S LAME.
~ We are in an alliance with the Federalist Party and Green Party.
--- con..gr..ats? What does that matter if someone is gonna join..
~ We want to give everyone a fair voice, and in the forum, I even have a PP advisory cabinet, if there is anything you would like to suggest, or if there is a current issue we need to discuss.
--- *slow claps* congrats for creating something somewhat useful.
~ We support the army.
--- Wow, thanks for shunning the National Guard and the Marines
Our IRC has quite a few members in it at a time, that's why it is notable.
Heh. So your saying 2 members is bad? We have 38 members currently, 2 being congress.
We are growing faster than the AAP currently, and they have the advantage of more members = more voice to recruit. Uncle Sam has been doing a great job bringing them back though.
Actually, awesome would be the word you were looking for. 😉
Hopefully, you'll be seeing this very soon. 😃
Thanks? I didn't know you could actually say something positive.
I use army as a generalization of all the nations armed forces. The National Guard is where it's at though, being a ex-SL.
Wow Panther, attacking little parties fun for you? I'm sorry the Nationalists aren't a giant empire that has existed since this game was born. GET A LIFE DUDE!
Novel idea Nathan, totally original 🙂 (With that comment I am taking credit for the FAQ idea as seen in the Federalist Party News)
Great article though, very informative and I'm sorry a negative nancy had first comment.
I didn't say it was bad - I said it was weak. I mean you guys are recruiting some of the most well known people. With all of your 38 members you couldn't have even won the california elections if everyone was party line voting..
UncleSam is doing an amazing job, and definetly deserves props from EVERYONE. You are growing slightly faster
I'm pretty sure I wasn't.
I can say some stuff that's positive, but what's so much different from the Nationalist Party to others? I didn't read much different, it kinda wavers, but really - all political parties in this game state the same things in different ways - it's either for or against and its stated in different ways.
Why don't you say the Nation's Armed Forces - What if someone was really simple minded (like me)?
I don't attack parties for fun. I only attack them when they have certain members which have been attacking the USWP for as long as I can remember. Plus, those are flaws, it's purely criticism, and it can only make them a better party otherwise. So maybe you should think in different perspectives before you call people negative nancy's.
Oh and by the way, I have a life; 😃
Good articles Nathans and the Nationalists!
Well, I would expect it to be weak, all new parties are. But it's gaining in strength, and fast.
Especially for him bringing the party up past the UCP soon. (Hopefully.)
Oh. Well that's what I meant. 🙂
The difference in all parties is activeness, and the will to support the party. That's something we have.
Then they get to be confused. Yay for them. 😃DD
Heh.
Oh yeah, totally original.
Go Nationalist Party. We are small but we are mean!
Whoa there.
I don't even rank on being one of the top rudest people in this game. Yeah, I tend to have a bit of bite to what I say, but that doesn't make me rude. I actually don't enjoy insulting parties at all. I don't enjoying insulting people either, but when they insult me, they have it coming. Sorry if I seem like "one of the rudest people in this game," but it's not like I'm really trying to be there. That's a negative thing, and I'd prefer not to be even referred to that.
You are rude, you criticized a great article by Nathan. It's people like you that give the USWP, a generally good party, a bad name. I also don't see your party making an attempt to advertise.
Really? Have you heard of the Brain's Campaign?
I didn't say it wasn't a great article. Criticism isn't rude, it's life. You read, comprehend, and make it even better next time so that the same criticism doesn't happen again.
"I don't attack parties for fun."
I'm sorry I had to laugh at this line. You don't attack for fun, but when you see an article you have to go and attack it. Do you notice that you are the only USWP member here (insert verb here, I'd say attacking or making an ass of himself, but I'll let you fill it it), so why are you here? I find it funny that the largest party is so insecure of themselves that they are afraid of an party 30 times smaller than them. I wonder why, could it be because they see that we are actually a threat to them? Maybe that should be our slogan, "Join the party that makes the USWP wet themselves like Sparta Kratos"
I really don't attack them for fun. I'm sorry I look at the latest media activity. I didn't know I wasn't allowed. This shows insecurity? Have you even read the comments that were posted? Does it matter that I'm the only USWP to voice my opinion? I'm not afraid of being shut down, it happens. I'm here because I wanted to read the platform, and just read about this fairly new party that I don't know all that much about. I find it funny how you guys can't just let my comment slide, but either:
a)I'm really easy to make fun of - Oh well
b)It must really be offending you
You really aren't a threat to us.. so erm, you can drop that as a point of an arguement.
kthxbye
@ Panther: I agree it was only criticism...but it was not CONSTRUCTIVE criticism. Saying our Manifesto is "lame" and asking sarcastic rhetorical questions about our policies does not make your criticism valid in any way, shape, or form.
Maybe my original comment wasn't constructive criticism - but my second one for sure is constructive. I list some pretty true and accurate points, I don't try to make a bad impression, sometimes it just happens.