[Debate] Revoking Motions

Day 4,216, 14:08 Published in Netherlands Netherlands by UNL Congress

Greetings, citizens of Netherlands,

NoTie112 requested the following debate be opened.

Topic: Revoking the Motions listed below
Requester: NoTie112

Text:

Reasoning per motion:

- Debt of M. de Ruyter (2014)
Congress should have an opinion about whether or not we still are considering someone after five years being under punishment. It also doesn't have any true effects, it does not blacklist said player or prevent him from returning. Add to that he most likely will never return, making this motion from all perspectives irrelevant.

- Kimi and Tomi (2015/2016)
Motion has no true effect either and has become irrelevant without the Forum/IRC community and their citizenship masks. In the in-game situation it is non-enforceable and also questionable with our Constitution.

- State Properties in Finance Sheet (2013)
This is really ancient. It is badly formulated by current standards and grew completely detached from what we currently are doing - Law and traditions like the Sheet provide everything and more that that motion intended to solve back then. No need to have it stick around.



Historical information can be found here:
- http://enetherlands.nl/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=10794
(Links to all motion related debates and votes can be found here)
- https://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-cp-shoutout-to-broersje-2396269/1/20
(Article about the debt)


Final vote counts:

Debt MdR:
Yes/Ja:17
No/Nee:5
Neutral/Neutraal:3

Kimi&Tomi:
Yes/Ja:17
No/Nee:5
Neutral/Neutraal:3

State Properties in Finance Sheet
Yes/Ja:19
No/Nee:1
Neutral/Neutraal:5

All motions are revoked.



djirtsdew & Shawtyl0w
CoC Team