Mea Culpa!
Elanaconda
Mea Culpa, Mea Maxima Culpa!!
In my quest to produce figures to eUSA about the effectiveness of our tax rate and the funding of a governmental Military Unit I came across a website that seemed to be producing the right numbers, but in the end it didnt.
For that I apologize to the eUSA community!! I thank TheNorm and Henrywilliamfrench for combining their effort in giving me the right numbers!
Hereby the damage numbers for the last 3 weeks (I did not include this weeks numbers since this week is not over yet).
Here are the graphs for damage dealt per MU over the last 3 weeks (if you dont beleive these numbers you can look them up here, add the number up yourself, I think Excel does a good enough job at that for not publishing them).
Here is a graph that shows the difference in privately funded and the one that spends al lot of our tax dollars for us.
My point from my last article stays the same, will we do less damage if USAF will not get their tax funding anymore, I dont think so, I think we just save a lot of tax payers money that can be used for Tanks and doing damage and also replenish our much needed Reserves.
Vote for a better eUSA
Vote Black Sheep
Regards,
Elanaconda
Media Director
Spokesman
The Black Sheep Party
Comments
O>
This just proves the point even better, USAF is a failed experiment and should be self funded.
★★★★ Baaaa o7 ★★★★
Congrats on Easy Company for being a privately financed MU and still outpowering the mass tax funded USAF.
Another reason to quit the tax payers funded MU of USAF and get more money into our much needed reserves!
★★★★ Baaaa o7 ★★★★
I'm proud to be a member of EZC, but it has to be said that numbers do not tell the full story here. Easy Company and the USAF are two different beasts, and this analysis ignores the fact that the USAF serves a Foreign Affairs purpose by being directly financed and commanded by the executive.
I'm not here to debate your conclusion, because I can say that I'm not sure what the best setup would be myself, but you have to understand that if you're advocating defunding the USAF, you're also advocating weakening the executive and the oversight of the central eUS government, which, over time, would change how we play this game.
Is that for the best? Well, that's an entirely different topic of discussion.
Voted nonetheless. I've always liked stats.
"you're also advocating weakening the executive and the oversight of the central eUS government, which, over time, would change how we play this game."
I see no problems here 😛
ong
YOURE FIRED!!!!!
Another great point on why YOU should join EZC because YOU to can make a difference.
EZC takes care of their members.
this is nice. not sure about conclusion
Baaaaaaaa
increase minnimum wage! i am sure the guys who like the high taxes also are the ones with communes to avoid paying the high taxes themselves!
we can clearly see with a job market wage of 45, but an average wage of 27.8
27.8/48=.61 so about 40% of americans are avoiding paying their fair share of taxes because of communes!
if we raised minnimum wage those who are avoiding taxes and not supporting america! will be forced to either leave or start helping out!
because they are not paying taxes anyways we will not miss them!
ohh just to be clear i stole the raising minimum wage idea from another player i cannot remember his username though.
he might have had different reasons for raising it
Actually the people running the communes foot the bill they pay out a lot when they work as manager (WAM) the people who work in communes get a dollar in wages but usually get several hundred dollars in supplies every day. So it's usually the poorest among us that benefit from working in a commune.
hm, someone who was congress 13 times and president 2 is supporting communes 🙂 the one who sets the taxes is the one who supports avoiding them! what a coincidence, "I think everyone should pay high taxes but just not me!"
I pay $110+ a day in taxes. While I do work in a commune to support SHIELD my party MU, I don't request supplies and have not for more than a year. Nice try though.
"the one who sets the taxes"
um... Congress?
voted
baaaaaaaaaaa
a great article- straight to the point.
baaaaaaaaa
o/
So let's assume we defund USAF. Those soldiers now go to PMUs. Those PMUs can't afford to take on the extra load, so they reduce supplies to keep their personal costs down, or end up spending more via their private supporters. Either way, someone is footing the bill and you likely end up with less damage overall.
Yep, got to agree with DMJ on that one.
you guys really need to adjust your tin foil hats to allow more circulation.