CoT: a broader and responsible outlook for a balanced world
UncIe
World War 6 is never over, lasting along battlefront lines and trenches all around the world, with countries being deleted and returning to the map again. Regardless of the difficulties and hardships for Circle of Trust and its non-party allies and partners, we see an uneven stalemate in eWorld, with TWO being strong enough to sustain a lasting advantage, but being unable to install a total occupation.
The vigour, energy and vitality of CoT countries and states beyond it who bravely combat TWO and reach impressive tactical success at times is unquestioned. I reckon, however, that it is time to think of the reasons which brought CoT to the seemingly eternal alive-and-running resistance position, and the potential to change the current environment into a more balanced system, which will let the bravery and dignity of CoT and non-CoT opposing their enemies have a more effective realisation.
This article may cause dubious and uneasy reactions and yelling at me, but I'm sure that this-or-that balancing system should be installed in order to benefit both CoT and non-CoT states. Our countries and e-world as a whole deserve a more interesting game than the WW1-styled positional war.
Speaking from a stance of a three-term CoT country president amidst the world war, ex vMC and aSC of the alliance, I' m obliged to present a vision of changes and reforms required on COT side only, although I'm sure TWO and other alliances, as well as suballiances, have their own strategies implemented.
So, CoT requires several immediate changes:
1. Allow cross-MPPs and drop the hostile MPP (countries allied to countries at war with CoT) notion from CoT charter.
I can say something openly. For a long time CoT got used to act immaturely and lean on back of TWO's damage, being a sword against EDEN and ex-EDEN countries. At the same time the Charter of CoT, having MPP restrictions, has set a major setback for diversification of allied ties of the Circle, while TWO enjoyed this through creating diversity for each of major countries.
Although TWO as a whole has never supported neither directly Argentina, Romania, CUA states or indirectly - Turkey, Iran etc., it had de facto encouraged several of its members to form ties with them, thus creating a diverse and balanced environment.
CoT, at the same time, was restricted to not sign MPPs or cooperate with ex-EDEN states naturally or situatively opposed to TWO, thus creating an allied damage disbalance prior to WW6, which, together with diplomatic mistakes, dragged the e-World where it is now.
2. Sanctioning military operation involving two or more countries should be made by a joint decision of both SCs and the MC.
Monthly diplomatic planning for EACH country should be done at the beginning of each presidential term, as well.
3. Effective usage of alliance treasury.
The only way to quickly recreate organized mobile forces is an effective usage of COT treasure funds, motivating its members through combat orders in prioritized battles.
4. A diversified diplomatic outlook.
We see a more or less balanced and survivable environment only there where is a diversity of connections. This, for instance, is the Asian region, where Indonesia and Japan keep a contact with China and Thailand, trying to preserve healthy relations and consulting on matters of mutual importance. At the same time, of course, joint ATO efforts should be taken in countries of this region, as well as USA. Another good example of diversification is ROLA as an idea, where the model of Spanish involvement is at the moment only successful example of a positive direct damage drain in the closed TWO-CoT model.
In an open model we see another positive drain along Croatia-Turkey allied ties, when the latter supports the efforts of the former in joint operations with some CoT members against Serbia.
Examples of negative drain are Russia-Ukraine, where Turkey assists the latter, Bulgaria-Greece and Bulgaria-Romania, where Turkey assists the latter too.
Steady Non-attack pacts directly with opposing states or with states largely and primarily assisting the enemy side should be introduced. Where these are not deemed possible, an airstrike to a SAFER environment on RENTAL and RESPECTFUL conditions should be carried out to save forces for the time.
Summing up, there are countries with which NAP negotiation and partial cross-mpps are possible and necessary, and countries against which a concentration of allied damage is imminent. The best idea is if concentration includes a sided positive drain as mentioned above here.
5. Associated members/partners for peace.
Diplomatic immaturity has another example: members states have a master mentality despite the fact they were the ones to impose and enforce conditions only at the moment of heavily benefitting from TWO's allied damage. As stated above, the clauses on MPP signing with states allied to countries at war with CoT should be dropped. Moreover, CoT growth should have a different vector: countries not seeking membership of CoT but naturally interested in cooperation with it should be given associated membership or partnership for peace status. And it is UP TO CoT ONLY in this case to create an atmosphere of non-hostility: NO CoT state should declare war or fight against on an organized level against a partner/associated member. Such status should be given with 2/3 of COT votes. This clause is discussable.
6. Official reshaping of CoT policy towards other alliances
Time to review things and speak frankly. A sincere and eager time of non-hostility, publicly promoted, towards any major alliance or group of countries with allied ties in the world has come. YES: this should include public parting from anti-EDEN experience, and a strategy of combatting certain countries instead of fighting alliance windmills.
I see this strategy on a long-term scale as a way to make CoT, or any alliance which may be in similar situation 1,2 or 3 years later, an integral and effective alliance with strong leadership, not a team of brave but desperate monthly renewed Che Guevaras chanting "Viva la Resistance".
It's time to act maturely.
With respect to my readers,
khotko,
CP of Russia
ex vMC/aSC of CoT
CoT: a broader and responsible outlook for a balanced world
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/2300054/1/20
Comments
непонятная мизулина
провотал на всякий
и вверх
такая же тема. увидел что много цифр в vote и подумал, что люди одобряют и топик надо вверх.
ни черта не понял, но по аналогии с верхними двумя, тоже завотал
Я понял !!! Тут 6 глав! Каких -то, зачем - то.
в общем, будем надеяться, что тут что то хорошее написано 🙂 Вотнул.
провотал за воты и преза. тут наверняка что-то интересное и полезное. переведу попозже.
админы поддерживают статью на фейсбуке, вотнул на всяк случай.
Внезапно понял, что знаю английский. прослезился и провотал.
Зая, чисторусским поцыкам нужен перевод С:
Гуглтранслейт- ад.
Резюме статьи:
КоТ должен рулить.
Для этого следует сделать то-то и то-то
По вотам от англоязычных можно понять, что дело говорит)
Попозже перевод, время не ждало
[removed]
khotko to alliance HQ!
Chuga Chuga Woo Woo!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDDPj3qhPbIНуу
Прошу прощения у русских читателей, перевод будет позже. Если кто-нибудь хорошо переведет за меня, с меня тысчонка игровой валюты.
ХотьКто кросавчег, преклонитесь КоТы, порадуйтесь еРоссияне, пункт 5 - время пришло, сдавайте пистолеты.
Деньги переведи на счет РВА, я за благотворительность.
Плохо. Лучше пива выпьем
лучше уж водки тогда, от пива живот растет, я проверил
Если уж водку пить, то соображать надо на троих. (:
Летом какая водка? Водка зимой, летом только пиво 🙂
нет, ревендж прав, водка!
водка+
Русские должны быть только водку. Если начнёте пить пиво, то потеряете свою национально-культурную самоидентичность и превратитесь в европейцев (фу, какой ужас!)
Украинцев их местное пиво что-то в кого-то другого превращает
Да нормальное пиво, особенно Черниговское)
Пиво было, водка тоже. А перевода так и нет. Непорядок.
o7
Well said.
As chilean president i think the same: we need those changes now.
voted o7
o7
finally someone with common sense. way to go!
v
Well said khotko, we need changes
o7
v!
Finally some positive movement o/
The biggest problem was made wen we (CoT) slept the breakup of EDEN and we didn't have in that period government with clear vision for the future. It's gonna be very difficult to make changes especially in this period ( August ) but we must lay the foundation of a strong alliance. Our common goal as people of CoT must be to elect efficient and effective government / CP who can make changes. We need leaders and I know that we can be more stronger that we are in this moment.
I'll be self critic now, Macedonian&Bulgarian diplomacy in the last couple of months was disaster and the main problem with ex-EDEN countries who are "neutral" is the hatred they have towards us and we didn't manage to softened them and to show them the bigger picture and the mutual interest...
Yes changes are needed and I support every positive step that we make... o7
which mutual interest could we have toward CoT? You were only some "brave" countries, hiding under the wing of ONE's damage and being used by them as a meat shield. after loosing the ONE MPP's, your true strenght and combat value has emerged. You are paying the price for the short term policy of last year. Enjoy, it will last a while
First I never mentioned Romania, you are not officially TWO member but you are part of TWO so my comment wasn't about Romania.
Secondly, Macedonia was ONE and the power of ONE was with Macedonia&Indonesia... The dominance of TWO was with the power of CoT and now is with the damage of you, our south neighbors, Argentina and "neutrality" of Turkey&China.
And finally, nothing last forever and you should now that, Romania was conquered a hundred times from Bulgaria/Hungary&Serbia and now you are free "brave" country with MPP's with former ONE countries and some ex-EDEN countries. Enjoy while you can.
So, the ex EDEN do the same now and even worst. Most of you are against TWO but still fighting against CoT in favour of TWO. And other like Romania just sold out themselfs for TWO damage and have a dare to insult us. We had our fights with EDEN, TWO only kept bonuses and fight for DO through MPP untill they bored. Now is the same, but the ballance - CoT vs TWO+exEDEN+neutralEDEN is even worst than it was for CoT+TWO vs EDEN. Atleast we have our union with own interest and never been pupets of TWO as Romania, officialy become.
Lol, I dont know what both of you are smoking, but It seems to Be very strong 😁
We have also erased Hungary, Serbia and Bulgaria a lots of times. We can be friends/neutral to them because we have a mutual respect as regards as the fighting strenght and value as enemy.
This is somerhing you never had and prob never will.
Nobody could keep us erased and nobody now or later
Have a great day 😉
Nobody could keep you erased, because romanians own this game and constant change rules in your favour. I don't even want to know what is behind the table. Nobody likes you in this game, because you are vicious i can't be loyal allies to nobody in long term. You PTO your allies and atack eBulgaria, for example, multiple times with no provocations, just to strike in the back as you like. And you can't erase a thing if you don't have admins and 3/4 of the game in your side. For example Croatia and Bulgaria erased Serbia, you were just a walk-on. And you are much more times erased by Hungary, than you erased them. Bulgaria don't recognise you as primary enemy to erase you enough, but i think this will change soon...
When we had AS in Indonesia, who fight against as? Poland? Serbia? Hungary? nope. It was Bulgaria and whole COT.
Bulgaria and COT was the merciless enemy of EDEN/proEden not TWO who want only to conserve the bonuses like you said.
And now you want peace or some kind of agreements? i think Nope..
And btw: Romania was deleted by Bulgaria/COT, yes but NOT TWO MONTHS ( AND CONTINUE)... with 1 win in a rw ha ha
Maybe in 1 year peace with BG
OK one more time, I never mentioned Romania and my comment wasn't about you so stop wining. About your AS and UK's on Indonesia - if you attack Indonesia you are attacking Macedonia to, that's why you loose.
And I don't think that anyone from CoT want peace or agreements with Romania.
This article and my comment were NOT about Romania so I really don't know why Romanians are commenting on my post.
o7
Indonesia is CoT, what you expect? Try to AS TWO country next time. You attack CoT and expect we don't fight - really? But you know very well that TWO fight there too, especially Hungary. Now is easy to splurge with this support, but when we erase you we were only CoT and Hungary, and keepeng you erased was not a target, only without congress for a short.
"Examples of negative drain are Russia-Ukraine, where Turkey assists the latter, Bulgaria-Greece and Bulgaria-Romania, where Turkey assists the latter too.
Steady Non-attack pacts directly with opposing states or with states largely and primarily assisting the enemy side should be introduced..."
Hmm this tell me another thing.
Better to make clearly statements. And is good to mention you NOT want to make peace with RO, maybe Greece, maybe Turkey.... so ...for what this article.
And Btw, BG asked for peace in every month from RO, so what you understand in
"And I don't think that anyone from CoT want peace or agreements with Romania."
your think bad. 🙂
I will stop here, sorry because i posted in a "COT" article : ROFL
"Examples of negative drain are Russia-Ukraine, where Turkey assists the latter, Bulgaria-Greece and Bulgaria-Romania, where Turkey assists the latter too.
If you read between lines this is about Turkey not about you. This article is about neutral ex-EDEN countries not our south neighbors who are part of TWO and not about Romania who is hm let me see TWO ?
It's not the case what we want, for example you have NAP with Bulgaria what you gonna do, with who you will fight - Serbia/Hungary/Turkey ??? I don't think so...
Also there are some arch-rivals in this game Macedonia-our south neighbors , Serbia-Croatia, Chile-Argentina, Romania-Hungary ( that's why you are not officially in TWO ) ect... and if you see the last events you'll know that that rivalry will last...
Maybe just maybe after the breakup of TWO things gonna change and we'll have mutual NAP's but til than a really don't think that any peace agreement with TWO country can be made not because of CoT but because your feeling of dominance : )
And you are welcomed to comment in every CoT article but how I said before my first comment was not about Romania...
Ok roger that.
But let me to tell you, Ro, GR, TR is almost an entity, so talking about drag Turkey in your sphere without care anything about Gr and Ro is a deadly mistake.
we will see in time.
The fact is BG with their aggressive policy in last year made enemies all over the world, they have ISSUES with Turkey and Romania and with Greece too. And this are the CORE of ex-EDEN + China but with China is another problem, Eden old fags there... he he.
Croatia is already with you but not because they love you, because Serbian policy.
This article and your post make statements about approaching of ex EDEN states.
I want to ask you, which ex EDEN STATES? Turkey? alone? hmmm
v, o7
nice article : voted
o7
HAIL mother of Russia! \o/
FAIL COT! o7
It's time to open your legs, CoT 😃
lol