[BMTFORCP] Foreign Affairs (Dealing with them pesky foreigners)
Baroness Margaret Thatcher
A overview of the situation
I am writing this fully on my own views on our situation in the eWorld. If I am to be quite frank with you the reader this nation is not taken I feel seriously globally. The Order of New Eworld or ONE has neglected us. Government officials I have noticed have all churned out the same mantra about them aiding us a lot in the last month. I would like to remind people of the last time we were wiped. Where were ONE then? I am also learning that ONE is prioritising in areas where the nations have a big population unlike us. I for one want to see this changed and I will now tell you what I intend to do.
MY FOREIGN AFFAIRS PLAN:
Strengthening our position in ONE
The first thing I want to see sorted out is our position in ONE. So the first week of my term I will press on for a greater say for Britain in the alliance. I am determined to get a fair deal for us, which is probably for many who are reading this something positive. I will not point the finger to any previous government, but this nation seems to be lacking the backbone of its politicians. Under a BMT administration we will hopefully remove this.
We may though not get the deal that we press for. So what will happen then is I will look into the best long-term solution for our nation so that maybe building strong relationships through neutrality to considering joining the dominant alliances in Western Europe. If it came to this, I would want this to be a discussion of which everyone can discuss rather than just with the cabinet!
Repairing Relations
I would also during my term like to restore relations with many of those nations we consider enemies. A few months back we would have considered these countries our allies. I want to see us become a nation with an honourable reputation for standing by its agreements. HOWEVER those who wish to consistently backstab our nation will have consequences be that of embargoes or invasion. The UK will make those who seek to destroy us rue the day!
Irish-British Agreement
I know many people have brought up the issue. I have been converted to preserving the agreement as the reasons for it out weight the against e.g fruit regions and providing a buffer against Canada and Russia this was summed up well from Ergo Deus's article: http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/the-irish-peace-treaty-or-why-the-hell-do-we-have-to-keep-repeating-ourselves--2094598/1/20
I know I can’t create paragraphs of boulder dash, but I just try to get to the point!
Stay tuned ladies and gents as I still have:
Cabinet
Articles already release
😛
An Introduction... It's BMT!
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-bmtforcp-an-introduction-it-039-s-bmt--2093943/1/20
Domestic and Military Affairs
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/-bmtforcp-domestic-and-military-affairs--2094450/1/20
Comments
[removed]
Let's begin
The Order of New Eworld or ONE has neglected us. => When we needed help : they were there. But an alliance = each country can't the top prio during all days of a month. If each country fights for himself : be ready to be wiped.
So, without Poland and other ONE countries : We should have no congress, when you needed prio, we got them. Why ? because we helped our allies.
I will press on for a greater say for Britain in the alliance : Several UK citizens are involved in HQ
it is around the same for every ONE country, About UK : considering our size, we are well represented
About new alliances : it is populist at its best. You must talk with cabinet about current options before talking about that in public. Join the dominant alliance in West Europa : can you tell me its name, I'm curious 🙂
I would also during my term like to restore relations with many of those nations we consider enemies : You will say to Frenchs (or Germans) : I want to be your friends ?
Well, if the best case : they will consider you as an idiot. But you should know that it is quite impossible to have excellent relations with everybody. We can't have good relations with Croatia, Greece, Argentina , .... for obvious reasons. About France : as long as they will consider UK like their extention : you can't have good relations with them.
Embargo : Yeah that's fun, I had a good reason to do it against Frenchs but about invasion : think twice before do it
to finish, I would like to add that if you are elected and UK follows your agenda, we will be in the shit. I'm waiting to see the current cabinet and I'm curious to see who is your MoFA. Because following your manifesto : you have a lack of experience in foreign affairs
Hmm where is TUP's CPs manifesto? I shall not indulge by starting any mudslinging but it seems some people can't keep their dogs on a leash...
You publish something, I explain why your manifesto is danger. You can only answer : where is TUP CP manifesto ?
TUP hasn't unleash me to attack you. If you take it as a conspiracy : that's your problem, not mine.
I thought that you had some XP, but in foreign affairs : you have huge lacks
I will be honest and say foreign affairs is not my strong point. You may be one of the closed few who haven't been angry at ONE not my problem folk like you who wish to appease. Do I want to see us leave? I do not but I want to provide the best position for the UK. When I talk about repairing relations I mean those of which there is still light at the end of a tunnel.
I found it amusing you provided a few more nations of which I never mentioned. Do you think your mystic meg?
Good luck BMT.
A least a bit of positivity here o7
I think we should leave ONE. Our future lies with Spoland.
You're miles off buddy.
It is good you are honest about not being strong in foreign affairs. Getting more influence in ONE would be nice, but as I see it UK get strong support already. When ONE would fight one day for us, we should fight a month for the others to give them the damage back. I have seen ONE fighting for us (and supplying weapons for us) for several days. Without the strong support from Poland and Macedonia we got we would not have a single region freed from occupation and we would be without congress.
I saw you mentioned neutrality. Please do not go that way. Our enemies would come to take the regions they need to get a lot of bonus. We are not Belgium, we have very valuable resources.
A new alliance of Western European countries is a no go, because it would either be dull or either a failure.
Anyways good luck in getting a good cabinet.
BMT, you have a nice newspaper logo, and a suggestive name Margaret Thatcher, apart from that I can't see any value or insight in your proposals. Sorry!