There is Nothing so Stable as Change

Day 1,795, 13:00 • Published in USA USA • by Azazel Romanov


Party elections went well, but it was basically a reaffirmation of the status quo. Four Top 5 Parties remain with the one still controlled by AFA leadership. I've seen from recent articles and posts that AFA is implementing apparent congressional and party structure reforms, but as far as I am concerned (and from my observations), these are merely superficial changes in response to our criticisms and arguments against them. Essentially this is a front for a non-existent party structure, and an establishment of rules more for outside consumption than internal practice. This does raise a good question though: If the elites are wrong and do not hold the right views to run America, why is AFA listening to our advice? This seems like a very contradictory and confusing policy.

I do believe that congressional elections won't really change much, aside from AFA possibly gaining a slightly larger percentage of congressional seats and citizenship proposals, which they will unsurprisingly only grant to their own supporters. Again, this requirement seems contradictory to their "principles" of freedom of action and freedom of association.

I do think that the process of a unity candidate for President will be more developed and coordinated this month. I am already seeing signs of this, and it appears all parties are prepared to run legitimate primaries and have open deliberations for choosing a candidate. Again, I only desire that the candidate is qualified and a dedicated American. Beyond that does not matter to me. I wish all contenders good luck and all parties smooth processes.



So I have written before on my faith in the CTRL alliance as a chance to completely change the face of US foreign relations. As you may have read from our President's new article, this alliance may be coming to an end as we near closer to a conflict with Hungary (our reason for moving through Austria). Poland is expected to break with us in this move, which would pit one member of CTRL against the other, effectively ending the new alliance. I had hoped for a different direction in foreign policy for the United States, but it seems we may move back to older allies. We can already see this with our improving relations with France. Whether or not we can repair relations with other countries is yet to be seen, but I am confident in the work of our State Department in negotiations. I do still hold out the hope that something will change because of this entire situation, and that it will not simply be a complete reset to older war games.

Again, look forward to hearing from me in upcoming editions of the WHPR.