ILP Betrayal

Day 1,926, 05:31 • Published in Ireland Ireland • by Gerald Smyth


Many in the new so-called "ILP/Labour" Leadership claim that whole affair was not a PTO?

Isn't it odd that a group of people - once rivaled by the ILP - entered the Party before the election?

Isn't it odd that after said election, all cabinet positions were changed around by players who have little experience in the party?

Isn't it odd that the ILP Leadership Board was dismissed?

Isn't it odd that the name was changed to a Party the ILP tried to situate itself away from?

Isn't it odd they put up a candidate who has spent very little time in the ILP, who has hated the ILP and without much consensus from other players?

Isn't it odd they changed the description removing info for new players regarding IRC, Liam Tatlock's lottery and forums (things I assume they have no control over? Not sure though)?

Isn't it odd this wave of players once alienated by the ILP have been warring with older, truer members of the ILP?

AND THEN THEY CLAIM IT WASN'T A PTO!

It was a PTO, perhaps not in the traditional sense, because it was a betrayal. But it was obviously a PTO. And not a good one.

I think the kunts/Patriots/remnants of ICA/or whatever they call themselves these days should just establish a new party and start over again. It isn't that hard to get your views expressed. They obviously have the money, time and resources because staging a PTO isn't that easy. Return the ILP back to the true leftists of Ireland! Please end the asshattery.

Traitors = Asshats
Labour ≠ ILP

Thank you for your time,

Gerald Smyth
Prime Minister
Former ILP Party President
Founder of the ILP Leadership Board

P.S. And of course I expect a fruitful and respectable "sharing of opinions" in the comments as compared to an arguement with "you stuppids" and "f*ck u" (this is sarcasm)