#OccupyEverywhere

Day 1,419, 20:18 Published in USA USA by The Libertine
Ramblin’ outa the wild West
Leavin’ the towns I love the best
Thought I’d seen some ups and downs
’Til I come into New York town
People goin’ down to the ground
Buildings goin’ up to the sky
- Bob Dylan "Talkin' New York"

Greetings fellow eReppers

What follows is a hodgepodge of pictures, quotes, and original thoughts put together as a sort of tribute to the #Occupy protests going on around the nation.

All that I ask is that any comments left for this article are kept civil and apolitical.

Enjoy.

___




___


This is a game that moves as you play
-X

___


In the background of everything going at these protests is one undeniable fact: we have built a societal and fiscal structure that relies on uninterrupted growth. We take on student loans because we believe we will easily get jobs and those jobs will pay well enough to someday pay off those loans (and help pay for rent and car insurance and gas and food and medical expenses and electricity and heating oil and, at bare minimum, the cell phone bill).

What happens when youth at home and youth around the world all of the sudden cannot find any jobs, even McDonalds jobs, to pay their way out of debt?

This question/protest is not an indictment of any political party. There is no anger, at least from my own perspective. There is despair. There is confusion. There is sadness. And frustration. But, underneath all of that, there is also hope. Hope for a new way of things.

But hope can't pay the bills.

___




me @ virtual #OccupyWallStreet in NY, eUS

join me

___


What these people are doing is building, for lack of a better word, a church of dissent. It’s not a march, though marches are spinning off of the campground. It’s not even a protest, really. It is a group of people, gathered together, to create a public space seeking meaning in their culture. They are asserting, together, to each other and to themselves, “we matter”.
- Matt Stoller

___




This is worth keeping in mind, but it doesn't matter what % you are in or where you live if your debt burden is insurmountable and if there are no jobs to be had.

___


Of course, there are jobs to be had. Some places have it worse off than others. I personally just found part time employment after a long search.

But many have been unemployed for more than 12 months with no job prospects. Many teachers are being laid off because of budget woes.

And many are taking jobs that they are over-qualified for. A woman on NPR the other day said she used to be the COO of a small tech company. She lost that job and she ended up moving to Florida find a job as a veterinary assistant.

Think about how that crunches up employment.

-100,000 white collar professional are laid off.
-100,000 people with extensive resumes and experience are then looking for new jobs.
-100,000 graduating college seniors are now possibly competing with 100,000 recently laid off professionals that are now desperately looking to take any job with pay + healthcare, no matter how crappy the pay is
-100,000 graduating college seniors are now possibly competing with 100,000 recently laid off professionals who had an easy time finding employment during the late 90s after their college graduations, benefiting simply from being born into the right time and place
-100,000 new graduating seniors next year are now competing with 100,000 from the previous year and with the 100,000 laid off professionals
- And so on. How do you like your odds?

___


We have built a structure that relies on constant, consistent, ceaseless growth. What happens if that is interrupted? What happens if growth is halted indefinitely?

It's been said that perhaps when we think of the 50s boom in the USA we should also keep in mind that it was a result of Germany (and most of Europe) and Japan being blown to bits, giving us easy exportation opportunities.

It's been said that capitalism in general relies on a sort of colonial exploitation. Whether it be slavery, literal resource colonies in Africa (and around the globe), or in situations like the post-WW2 world we can see this to be partially true. In order for one man to gain, another somewhere must lose.

What happens if there is world peace? What happens if all countries have the technology and factories to build what they need? What happens when we run out of "others" to exploit to fuel the growth engine of capitalism?

We're left with only three options. Exploiting each other. Starting a new multi-country war to again create exploitable economic imbalance. Or reverting to a community-based free-help and barter-based economy.

I'm not a fan of any of the options, to be quite honest.

Is this the price of peace? It is scary to think of peace in those terms. But it is something that many have known for ages and eons: war is a very profitable endeavor...for the victors.

___



Wanna practice?

Along the same lines:



___


Finally: I’ve heard a lot of people complain that those currently occupying Zucotti Park are “white college kids” with “dreadlocks” or “safety pins through their noses,” and that this is alienating or disgusting to people who wear button-down shirts and work full-time jobs. Since I’m someone who wears button-down shirts and works a full-time job, this unease is something I’m familiar with. But you know what? You don’t pick protests like you pick restaurants or nightclubs. Nobody wants to read your Yelp review of Occupy Wall Street. The great thing about protest activism is that it becomes meaningful once you stop thinking of yourself as a consumer and start thinking of yourself as a participating citizen. So if you have a problem with all of the ripped jeans and Birkenstocks that you’ve been seeing wandering around Zucotti Park, get your buttoned-down ass on a train or subway, and go there yourself, and start talking to people. Invite your buttoned-down friends. You’ll find, first of all, that the protest begins to look more like something you’re comfortable with. And you’ll find, also, that those people who seem so foreign or naïve to you on television actually want the same things that you want, and that it’s easier to get those things once you get over yourself and start making noise about it.
- reader mail @ The Dish

___




lol

___


In academic papers and a popular book, American Mania, Whybrow argues, in effect, that human beings are neurologically ill-designed to be modern Americans. The human brain evolved over hundreds of thousands of years in an environment defined by scarcity. It was not designed, at least originally, for an environment of extreme abundance. “Human beings are wandering around with brains that are fabulously limited,” he says cheerfully. “We’ve got the core of the average lizard.” Wrapped around this reptilian core, he explains, is a mammalian layer (associated with maternal concern and social interaction), and around that is wrapped a third layer, which enables feats of memory and the capacity for abstract thought. “The only problem,” he says, “is our passions are still driven by the lizard core. We are set up to acquire as much as we can of things we perceive as scarce, particularly sex, safety, and food.” ...

The richest society the world has ever seen has grown rich by devising better and better ways to give people what they want. The effect on the brain of lots of instant gratification is something like the effect on the right hand of cutting off the left: the more the lizard core is used the more dominant it becomes. “What we’re doing is minimizing the use of the part of the brain that lizards don’t have,” says Whybrow. “We’ve created physiological dysfunction. We have lost the ability to self-regulate, at all levels of the society. The $5 million you get paid at Goldman Sachs if you do whatever they ask you to do—that is the chocolate cake upgraded.”

...

Everywhere you turn you see Americans sacrifice their long-term interests for short-term rewards.

What happens when a society loses its ability to self-regulate, and insists on sacrificing its long-term interest for short-term rewards? How does the story end? “We could regulate ourselves if we chose to think about it,” Whybrow says. “But it does not appear that is what we are going to do.” Apart from that remote possibility, Whybrow imagines two outcomes. The first he illustrates with a true story, which might be called the parable of the pheasant. Last spring, on sabbatical from the University of Oxford, he was surprised to discover that he was able to rent an apartment inside Blenheim Palace, the Churchill family home. The previous winter at Blenheim had been harsh, and the pheasant hunters had been efficient; as a result, just a single pheasant had survived in the palace gardens. This bird had gained total control of a newly seeded field. Its intake of food, normally regulated by its environment, was now entirely unregulate😛 it could eat all it wanted, and it did. The pheasant grew so large that, when other birds challenged it for seed, it would simply frighten them away. The fat pheasant became a tourist attraction and even acquired a name: Henry. “Henry was the biggest pheasant anyone had ever seen,” says Whybrow. “Even after he got fat, he just ate and ate.” It didn’t take long before Henry was obese. He could still eat as much as he wanted, but he could no longer fly. Then one day he was gone: a fox ate him.

The other possible outcome was only slightly more hopeful: to hit bottom. To realize what has happened to us—because we have no other choice. “If we refuse to regulate ourselves, the only regulators are our environment,” says Whybrow, “and the way that environment deprives us.” For meaningful change to occur, in other words, we need the environment to administer the necessary level of pain.

- Micheal Lewis (the Moneyball guy) in "California and Bust"

___


Some closing thoughts:

First, again, please keep any comments civil. I don't mind criticism of the subject matter of the article, if you feel compelled to share that, but I really don't want to see petty back-and-forth arguing between commenters. There are plenty of shitty internet forums set up for that purpose. Keep it there.

Second, whether looked at through the lens of OWS or not, the future of the economy and of the world scares me each and every night. Not in a "omg government debt rah rah NOBAMA" way. What worries me most is that we are finally approaching the point that many science fiction writers have predicted and feared for decades: the point at which machines take the jobs of people at a macro scale. It's not science fiction anymore. A quote I keep hearing is a variation of "If your job is easy to explain, then it will eventually be replaced." It's true, to an extent. And it's scary. I don't see the trend of machines taking human jobs reversing any time soon, perhaps ever.

Lastly, I still have limitless hope. I have hope in humanity's capacity to be human. To bond, to love, to share. To find a way to get by, even if it means completely reworking current societal norms of ways of living and earning and providing and raising families. We'll go back to basics. We'll remember to love each other. We'll adapt. We'll survive.

___




Banksy's flower thrower and my current avi. Feel free to use it if you'd like to join #OccupyEverywhere

Best of luck to all those struggling to get by and to those who know people that are struggling. If you are getting by just fine, please stop and think if there is anything you can do to help those in need, whether it be by donating food/goods, by volunteering, by donating excess money, or by simply sharing a smile with a complete stranger who is in desperate need of having at least just one happy moment in a day of sorrow.

Together we'll get by.

Happy #Occupying,
CRoy