[IW-PFC-SUFFER] The Charter
DMV3
IW-PFC-SUFFER Coalition Charter
The purpose of this document is spell out the mechanisms by which this Coalition will operate. The Coalition is voluntary and on the 16th of each month the new Party Presidents of each party can continue or withdraw from the coalition at their discretion.
The purpose of this Coalition is to unite the parties involved to increase the influence of our individual parties and provide greater opportunity to participate for our members. This will be done through a unified Congressional Caucus and by allowing each party the opportunity to nominate a candidate as the Coalition candidate for Country President.
The composition of the Coalition shall be that of an Executive board. Each party shall appoint three (3) members to the board each month by the 17th of each month. The board shall then elect a Chairman from their membership to oversee and lead the Coalition for the month.
Congress
On the 26th of each month the Coalition Chairman shall start a Congressional Caucus thread including Congress members of each party and each Party President. The first order of business will be to put up a single candidate from the Coalition as Speaker and another member as Deputy Speaker. After a Speaker candidate and Deputy are selected the Chairman shall select a member of the Caucus to act as Whip for the Congressional session.
The Whip's duties are to ensure all members of the Caucus are aware of all discussion in Congress and to make sure all members of the Caucus are aware of open forum votes in a timely manner. The Whip will also make sure all potential legislation is communicated to the Board so that if necessary the Board can instruct the Whip to tell Caucus members how to vote on an issue. The Whip will be responsible for reporting back to the board any members who do not vote with the Caucus plus any members who miss forum votes.
Country President and Cabinet
Each month, party shall have a chance to nominate a member of their party as Coalition candidate for Country President. The selection of a candidate shall be turn based with the following order; IW, PFC, SUFFER. A party has until the 21st of the month to nominate a member of their party during their turn. If a party fails to nominate a member during their turn they will swap turns with the next party in order. This order will be upheld except under circumstances where the Coalition has a popular incumbent who wishes to seek reelection.
The incumbent must make the Board aware of their desire to seek reelection on the 21st of the month. If an incumbent fails to do so, all parties agree to nominate the next party's candidate in order. If an incumbent wishes to seek reelection the board must hold a vote on whether they believe the incumbent should be given an additional term. The incumbent must receive five (5) voted in favor from the board in order to be nominated to an additional term.
In order to offer our members a greater chance at participation Cabinet positions must first be offered to qualified members of a Coalition party before they can be offered to anyone outside of the Coalition. In the event there are no qualified candidates for a Minister position any interested Coalition members without experience must be offered a Deputy Ministry position. Each Cabinet must contain at least one member of each Coalition Party. In order to increase cooperation and promote inclusion the Vice President must be a member of a different Coalition Party than the President.
Communication
Due to the composition of the Coalition all Coalition communication must be in both English and French. This is extended to the Congressional Caucus, the Cabinet, and any communication from a Coalition elected President. When the Chairman or President do not Speak French or English they must employ someone to translate all their communication.
IW-PFC-SUFFER Charte de la Coalition
Le but de ce document est de spécifier comment cette Coalition opèrera. La coalition est volontaire, le 16 de chaque mois, les Présidents de chaque parti politique auront le choix de retirer leur parti de la coalition, ou de continuer comme participant.
La Coalition à comme but l’unification des partis qui participent, avec l’objectif final l’amélioration de l’influence de nos partis individuels et l’augmentation de la participation de nos membres. Cet objectif sera complété avec un Caucus de Congrès commun et en laissant chaque parti nommer un candidat qui participera au élections Présidentielles comme candidat officiel de la Coalition.
La Coalition se gèrera avec un Conseil Exécutif. Le 17 de chaque mois, chaque parti présentera (3) trois membres à ce conseil. Le conseil Exécutif élira le Président de la Coalition des joueurs nommés qui superviseront et conduiront la Coalition chaque mois.
Congrès
Le 26 de chaque mois, le Président de la Coalition commencera un fil incluant les membres du congrès de chaque parti et chaque Président de Parti. Le premier ordre du jour sera de nommer un candidat de la Coalition comme Président de la Chambre et une seconde comme Adjoint. Après avoir nommer ces deux, un troisième sera choisi comme Chef du groupe parlementaire par le Président de la Coalition.
Le Chef du groupe Parlementaire aura la responsabilité d’assurer que tous les membres seront informés à propos de tout discussion et de votes sur le forum. Le Chef du groupe Parlementaire fera en sorte que toute législation soit communiquer au Conseil Exécutif et de faire que nos membres voteront comme instruit par le Conseil.. Ceci est pour faire en sorte que le Conseil Exécutif peut être informé a propos des membres qui ne votent pas, et ceux qui manquent des votes sur le forum.
Président et Cabinet
Chaque mois, un parti aura la chance de nommer un membre de parti pour la candidature officiel du Président de pays. La sélection se passera tour par tour dans l’ordre suivant : IW, PFC, SUFFER. Un parti aura jusqu’au 21 du mois pour nominer le candidat comme Président. Si un parti ne nomine pas un Président à son tour, la nomination passera au prochain parti dans l’ordre. L’ordre sera obéi sauf dans la situation ou un titulaire se trouve dans une position de réélection.
Le titulaire doit informer le Conseil Exécutif de son désire de faire une réélection avant le 21 du mois. Si un titulaire n’informe pas le Conseil Exécutif, la nomination passera au prochain parti dans l’ordre. Si un titulaire cherche sa réélection, le Conseil Exécutif tiendra un vote pour décider si il recevra un autre terme. Le titulaire doit recevoir (5) cinq votes en sa faveur pour recevoir la nomination d’un second terme.
Pour que les membres de la coalitions aient une plus grande chance de participer à la politique du Canada, les sièges dans le Cabinet doivent être offerts aux membres de la Coalition avant d’être offert aux membres extérieurs. Dans la situation ou il n’y a pas de membres qualifiés dans la Coalition, tous membres sans expérience doivent être offerts des positions comme Adjoint. Chaque Cabinet doit contenir au moins un membre de chaque parti de la Coalition. Le siège du Vice-Président doit être soutenu par un joueur qui n’appartient pas au parti d’où vient le Président.
Communication
À cause de la composition des membres de la Coalition, les communications doivent être fait en Anglais et en Français. Ceci est étendue à au Congrès, le Cabinet, et toutes communications du Président de Coalition. Dans la situation ou un de ces joueurs ne parlent pas les deux langues, ils doit employer quelqu’un pour traduire à leur place.
I was going to add commentary to the charter, but I believe the document speaks for itself. I will however answer any questions or address any concerns in the comments.
Je allais ajouter un commentaire à la charte, mais je crois que le document parle de lui-même. Toutefois, je vais répondre à vos questions ou préoccupations dans les commentaires.
Comments
ebet
HAIL eCANADA!!! SUFFER!!!!!!!
[PROFETIN] I CONCURSO DE RELATO CORTO CASA DE LAS AMÉRICAS- 30 GOLDS-6000ccs
http://www.erepublik.com/es/article/2470439/1/20
Allahu akbar
arab must be added to the charter : (
Salaam Alaykum habibi!
xdxd as keke
o7
yeah o7
I still see a chance in there... So cute!
With the Coalition everyone has a Chance!
... ... ...
I'll sit down now.
Lies... All lies. Spoken by someone that encourages the Whip to oppress coalition Congress members.
There's nothing funnier than an inexperienced troll, lol.
Speaker? Deputy Speaker? Whip? You talk about the forum like it actually exists. Foxfire has made it plain that the forum is irrelevant and that Congress business can be exercised in game via group PM.
"...the Board can instruct the Whip to tell Caucus members how to vote on an issue."
I also remember being told that I oppress people, making them do as I say or running them out of Congress. Seems the coalition is already turning into that which it attempts to subvert. I am calling this an act of the "NEW ELITES". Grabbing power is the coalitions way it seems, keeping it out of the hands of the people is a new policy.
Now that I'm not of the Congress old farts club it is quite liberating. I see why you enjoy being on the outside looking in. I can accuse you of all the things you said I did wrong. I can poke holes in all your ideas without giving any real basis in fact. I can be the knight in shining armour touting "the will of the people is sovereign".
Foxfire is a single candidate for Congress, he can exercise his opinion anyway he sees fit. That's the great thing about the coalition we enjoy the collision of ideas until we find the best ones. You're an awful troll, you should keep your day job.
I see, I'm not worthy of your answer. That is fine, I'll keep asking questions until you can get around to telling people the truth.
(Hey kids! #1 rule of trolling: Deflect their questions by changing the subject, especially by pointing out that the questioner is lousy at asking questions.)
I answered your one question as basically everything else you say is an accusation with no basis in fact.
"...the Board can instruct the Whip to tell Caucus members how to vote on an issue."
No response, eh? Although I do enjoy that your ideas collide with one another instead of coalescing into one that's beneficial to all people.
I don't see a question there. I see an elitist criticizing others because the pose a threat to his power. Good job, you wonder why more people don't get involved this is your answer.
LOL you have some balls on you calling anyone else "elitists," McMastercard.
When I was in CPF I was definitely an elitist, but I turned away from that to help give others who aren't part of the establishment a voice and a chance to participate.
"I see an elitist criticizing others because the pose a threat to his power."
Back at you!
"When I was in CPF I was definitely an elitist, but I turned away from that..."
Wait, wut?! Hang on a sec...
/me checks who wrote this article...
Nope, sorry you comment is non sequitur.
Another way of saying that is, you tuned in, turned on and dropped out.
Not to mention this is all brought up almost in the form of an assumption that the Coalition will be able to vote in their Speakers. They'd have to elect more Congresspeople than CPF-MDP or be able to attract congress votes from outside their anti-theotherparties Coalition to accomplish this.
Ardikus, you must remember that DMV's version of any coalition is not to bring about what's best for Canada but to bring in power and take over as the new elite class.
He wont have any luck with that when the bottom 3 of the Top 5 have less voting power than the top two do.
At least if you openly work together there is no pretending that the Oligarchy doesn't exist.
I thought it was hegemony? It can't be coalition because that name's taken. Anyway, good luck with your pretending to be the 99%, you hippie traitor.
lol
Semantics, they're the same thing with different names.
\o/
o7
Ew telling your congress members how to vote, bleh.
This would be hilarious if it weren't dangerous. People might actually believe you can accomplish these things!
O7
good luck getting bogged down in language haha
Ƹ̴Ӂ̴Ʒ°ºø•❤•.¸✿⊱╮ Yetlanesi ✿⊱╮¸.•❤•øº°Ƹ̴Ӂ̴Ʒ
Was here !!
😮]
It's a shame that inclusion should be met with such hostility, but discriminatory practices rarely change without conflict. I look forward to a different approach of equal representation.
I do too, when will your opposition arise to knock down the coalitions oppression? I will form a group that will have the inclusion you are sure to be hostile. They cycle continues, congratulations. Brawhahahahahahahaha!
He looks forward to an different approach of equal representation... As long at the equal representatives dance to the coalition tune and do as he says. All others need resign. What a load of the same ol' same ol'.
I love how much we have angered you and we haven't even started. The fear is strong in you indeed.
I love how now you can't wait to ridicule my posts and distract people from your evil designs. lolol
Your butthurt stinks up the place.
The butthurt is very strong in Dill. I see a meltdown coming from him very soon.
C'mon McDicker, come at me!
(And for for pete's sake, I said "butthurt" first. You look like a dork when you repeat what I just said.)
The ad hominem is strong in this one too!
Tit for tat bothers you? lol
(Watch this, he'll have to respond. Trolls always insist on the last word. It makes them feel as if they'd won! 😃 FWIW I won't respond to him next time and that will infuriate him.)
Inclusion does not usually include silencing voices by telling them how to vote.
Sometimes for the good of the country votes need to be whipped. IIt's nothing no one else doesn't do from time to time.
You and I both know having a whip is more organizational than authoritarian. The fact we're organizing is why you guys are scared.
Any examples of when votes being whipped is good or nah?
Having a whip allows us to ensure people are aware of what's going on in the Meta sode of Congress. It ensures that those who want to be active stay on top of discussions and votes. That is the majority of what the whip will do.
Political correctness is anti-empathetic because it has correctness in it. We all have biases, we all have prejudices and if we cant talk about them openly - if we get attacked for it then this is an anti-empathetic movement and therefore it cannot complain about a lack of empathy.
Good luck, chicken 🙂