Wingfield For CP
Gavin C. Mister
I am writing this to convince the remaining voters to make that happen
now dont get me wrong, MIK is experienced to lead this position. but Wingfield can unite a larger part of the eUK together, His ideals fit better with our national image than his opponents
To see what his exact goals are you may read his manefesto here;
Wingfeild's Manifesto
Basically (if you have not read it already) he wishes to reform the economy with the financial agreements made with foreign countries and the number of Training Wars made as well
What i'm saying is to please, please consider your vote. Wingfield is a fine man to serve as CP again and as for his opponents:
Georgelakeland
Lord Newsham
MIK
Comments
Answer me this gavin, do you support reducing the number of TWs. Because technically that is wingfields policy. He wants to restore it. I increased the number.
Or have you not read it properly
I read a lot of the articles published in this country
I have read it and I know that it would decrease the number of TW's
I also know some TW's started are conflicts of interests for other players who had business in the county
One of them.
Which we already had before this month 😂
None the less I think what he's saying is good for this country and me as a player. nothing personal to you or Kant but I'm backing Wingfield, let's just have an election
The TW policy is BS and you can try to pretend as much as you want. Wingfield has simply no awareness
bro wingfield cant even unite the membership of the parties supposedly backing him, let alone anyone else
What excellent nasty trolling the very example that the TRS leaders are telling every one else to f off we now have the new elite!
we're just a party putting forward a candidate and a manifesto, that clearly many people (including members of the four parties colluding in backrooms against us) like. Nothing elite about it, just good old fashioned politics
Perhaps you should reflect on why it is that a candidate with the theoretical backing of 60+ votes is struggling to get half that
The good guys don't always win. Nowadays in politics bribery and dishonesty often provide victory.
" bribery and dishonesty" eh???? I want what you're smoking
Fore everyone's info this Troll is actually Addaway
I'm sorry but I've stayed neutral-ish for too long now.
It's just bullshit now. This has nothing to do with who is better, and everything to do with stupid party politics.
Just because MIK is a TRS candidate, you'd rather elect someone who is just, in simple terms, inactive. Because he's not TRS. Because the need to be in power means more to your lot than the betterment of the eUK.
His entire policy is "I will just go back to what it was when Huey was CP". Literally no substance. No ideas. NOTHING.
I don't have anything against him or the party, I don't see anything wrong with him taking the Huey George administration and using it as a blueprint for how he will control his
If your tired of stupid party politics a good way by doing that is staying out of the comment section
And what was better about Huey's Government? The lack of information? Of oversight? Congress being treated as an afterthought alot of the time?
He couldn't even be specific about what he did. His entire campaign comes across as an afterthought - basic articles with no actual substance.
If you took both campaigns and compared them in a non-biased factual way, MIK is by far the better candidate. Even if it's just because he could actually be bothered to write articles with real ideas.
I bet as soon as he's too inactive to press buttons at the right time, that will somehow be TRS' fault too...
Are you actually saying Huey was a bad CP? I don't know about you but I don't think you get elected for 2 years straight if your a bad President
What is better about AMD.'s government then now all the unicorns have vanished. Congress is a mess and only 8 people voted in the last meta vote. I see Darkmantle is the new attack dog "sorry I have stayed 'neutralish'" no one falls for that garbage.. Go back under your bridge
@Gavin "Bad" can mean a lot of things. He did some good stuff, he did some bad stuff.
The fact that this manifesto didn't even differentiate between that says it all.
@Keith - I was neutral for the last 2-3 months, from when I started as Speaker. I don't give a single car if you believe it or not, because the facts do not require your belief.
Only 8 people voted? So? CP does not control Congress or it's activity. And you were one of the people who didn't bother to vote, so get back in your lane.
You’re a negative troll Keith and people will start to see through it.
AMD as a member of the troll party you should see that comment as a bit hypocritical
@dark sorry I'll let Wingfield know next time he writes a manifesto to add the definition of good and bad. Can we all stop commenting now the election is over!
Yeah, that's not what I said. Nice try though.
Keith you are becoming unpleasant now!
I am dealing with unpleasant people
Look at your posts.
Wingfield has won even though its considered a draw. He wins because of the higher rank he is.
As for the article you have just written it seem very good for him and showed you are a person of many qualities about how to promote people .
And then i came to the bottom of the article.
It is not very nice to say to someone ''you know that 90% of house hold dust is made from dead shin. That is what you are to me.'' That person got 3 votes . 2 from other players that do not consider him so low as you place him.
As for the comment about me ''He is so dense that light bends around him'' i have searched about it and viewed the video about that comment. There are words said before that frase. Not sure if its a plus good thing to say this for me since it is from somewhere with these words before that frase. Nevertheless 8 people still voted for me so i thank them very much. The fraze you posted about me seems a different thing when someone sees the video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa-LSJBraXE. After seeing the comment i feel very insulted. So. dear Gavin C. Mister, see this as an opportunity of to change your attitude. Further insults like this will add you to my block list.
Probably the light you are seeing is something else. I gave it more thought. I blocked you. No time to think about giving more chances. I dedicate this song to you ,Gavin C. Mister, so you can have a clearer image of what that light you see might be. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnoikRec67k
It's just good nature playing, nothing personal. Like my article to you I liked where your comment was going until I read the bottom and a thoughtful song
You don't see Lord Newsham here blocking me and writing a passive aggressive comment, he is just more professional than you
silence is not professional to me. stating my opinion about how i felt when i saw my name and the image under it IS professional.