Who's the Boss?
fingerguns
“A house divided against itself cannot stand.” –The Bible, Abe Lincoln, other people, me just now.
Yes, drama has gone down. It has been brewing for quite some time, but I hope the worst of it is over.
Meh. Idealism.
I know RL😕
= eRep, but we really don’t throw all of our American ideals out the window just because we’re on the internet. We have modeled our nation after our RL nation and I know those of us in the Feds want to take that a step further and treat parties like States (small government good). There is no real need from a game mechanics perspective to have a style of government different from what we have in real life. Actually, the game itself seems to be modeled around American-style democracy (including “local” government). This is a good thing and should give us some kind of advantage, but instead we’re falling victim to the exact same things that plague our RL nation and political world.
If you have no idea what I am talking about, read these:
HR's Paper
NXNW's Paper
Perhaps I am oversimplifying things here, but it appears the root of the problem is that there is confusion about who is in charge- The elected Commander-in-Chief or the appointed Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff? Knowing we have a Constitution, based on the real deal, that should be easy enough to answer.
President of the United States > CJCS > JCS > everyone else
Unfortunately, because of the way it is worded, some are confused. The Military organizes itself and chooses how it is run. While that seems to imply that the President has no control over who is promoted, who works at communes, how they set up roll call and distribute arms, some seem to think that it is actually license for the JCS to dictate all foreign policy, regardless of executive decision. Not really sure where that’s coming from. Additionally, it says the President and the JCS consult with each other. I take that to mean ‘talk to and discuss.’ Makes sense… the military know our military resources and capabilities better than anyone. The President would surely have to speak with them before planning any kind of invasion or attack so we can be sure we aren’t slaughtered.
The Constitution encourages and even requires people to work together… but it apparently isn’t clear enough on who has the final say. One would think the title Commander-in-Chief sorta gives it away, but I suppose more clarity is needed. I hope Congress gets on that immediately so there are no further problems.
Done. Nothing more any of us can do unless we are in Congress. And for those people out there requesting ridiculous levels of insider information on this issue, let me ask you this- Are you really about to pledge allegiance to an individual over this nation? Really?
We are about to throw the hell down in battle…with our actual enemies. We need everyone on board, especially our military. I hope we can all rally together to advance our interests abroad. I know some people want this argument to go on and on, but what is that helping?? Come on now.
America above self. Always.
Comments
A house divided against itself cannot stand.” –The Bible, Abe Lincoln, other people, me just now.
and Benjamin Franklin
I said 'other people'! lol
VOTE + SUB
PLS do it back !
Croatia -beautiful country
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/croatia-beautiful-country-show-to-the-world--1376296/1/20">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/croa[..]1/20
Hail EDEN !
Voted.
can you say 'guido' on t.v.?!
FG = Well said = Congress resolve this = That is all.
The problem of course is that the Constitution of eUSA is a contradictory document that says the military is the equal to Congress and the President as a third of the government as well.
Eh oh, oh eh!
cool beans, voted hard indeed. Communication solves problems. Lets all get back to bashing huns.
@Rod Damon- exactly why it needs clarity
I'll make a multi called Benjamin Franklin and rewrite the Constitution, sound cool?
Well said FG. Nice work.
@joshua: dont you want a madison multi?
I'm the boss. 'nuff said.
The proposed Constitutional Revision:
http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/a-constitutional-revision-1377020/1/20">http://www.erepublik.com/en/article/a-co[..]/1/20
@Candor: Er, no. This doesn't take into account a PTO or an incompetent president. The JCS should decide who their representatives are based on military/strategic planning experience, knowledge of game mechanics, their grasp of the military and political situations around the world, and their ability to inspire and lead their subordinates. The JCS don't come and go every month. They all know each other: their strength, weakness, demeanor, etc, based on many months of working together.
We can't always rely on the President to make the best call here. This kind of idealism stems from RL bias and does not take into account the realities of this game.
There are issues to clear up, to be sure, but this is not one of them.
@Maruishima
Thank god the JCS is infallible otherwise they might need a check on their power.
@Michael
The government funds the military. Is that not balanced enough for you? Also, see Candors post.
The President is ELECTED!
Military staff is APPOINTED!
Easy to solve or it's Military Junta.
@Dr_Revenue
The game doesn't work like that. The military's budget is supplied by Congress. The military has no power via game mechanics other than to ignore orders, in which case said funding is cut off.
As long as our eConstitution recognizes the military as an equal branch of the government, it should have *some* say in how things work, such as appointing its own leaders based on qualifications rather than politics.
Well said..voted hard.
its a shame that we allowed this incident to interrupt our military plans for Serbia, and have now allowed them to take the initiative and attack us first. Divided we fall ..and whatnot.
Can you say Boss on TV?
I agree.
though what is your country to you. I think it may be different for some people.