Unjust Enrichment

Day 1,645, 14:50 • Published in Croatia Croatia • by Dr_Revenue
Unjust Enrichment



In order to accustom a regular user, whether a paying customer or not, with the doctrines and torts in Common Law, I have decided to publish several articles, absent of any regulatory misleading representations by the defendant and therefore addressing most applicable contractual remedies.

Why is it the Common Law?

Terms of Service - 11 Our Liability - 11.1 “…To the extent permitted by law, we expressly exclude:

11.1.1 all conditions, warranties and other terms which might otherwise be implied by statute, common law or the law of equity; and
11.1.2 any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage incurred by any Citizen in connection with our Website…”
Section 11 is abundantly supplied with hollow words except for introduction of the common law.

Concept Summary

The doctrine of unjust enrichment requires proof of three elements:

1. an enrichment to the defendant (guess who)

2. a corresponding deprivation to the plaintiff (must be a paying customer)

3. the absence of any juristic reason for the defendant’s enrichment (the lack of defendant’s willingness to perform renders no juristic reason effective)
You be the judge.

Dr_Revenue’s Law Office