Tied election, Wingfield to win off XP
Gavin C. Mister
After an unpleasant election a tied vote (37-37) has been produced. This is one of the if not the closest election (anybody older correct me) but since the rules state that the candidate with the highest XP wins, Wingfield will take it because he has almost 200 XP levels over MIK
In all this was a exiting and at some points unpleasant election which reminds me to say: please refrain from starting a argument chain in the comment section. I'm not saying it's all other people's faults I am to blame a bit too but the election is over, this article is nothing more than a analysis of sorts
Thank you all
Comments
Alright who wants to argue with me??? Give me a topic and I'll disagree with you on it and maybe insult you a bit as well
I think you're cute.
youre mad
I like your new profile pic woldy
[removed]
It was too rude I can't do this.
Thanks temujin you're cute too
you've failed hail astrid again gali
Ta Gav /0
GG WP
As much as I congratulate Wingfield for assuming the next CP of eUK, I can't help but criticize the system.
Again I have nothing against either candidates.
But this system has its obvious flaws, this is undemocratic. Other types of mechanisms could have been thought.
A second election within the congress members could have been an option, for example.
Still, having no power to change anything about what's done, I wholeheartedly congratulate the winning candidate, and wish him and his team the best to run the country.
I agree its not a great system, i would really prefer if after the election it went into a runoff election vs the two front leaders
but as you said we cant change anything so, it is the way it is
[removed]
Slower at doing what.
👀👀👀
oh come on.... for sure...adding lots of battles during times of the day. but most of that was corrected at some point. Another thing was the way things were said in the congress message board and information given to us. There was something with george hueys ways of being faster and efficient.
You’re delusional then
George, there was no reason for you to write this.
On one hand you said you blocked me on the other your here commenting, why?
The reason why i wrote it was because your text was inspiring. So I added my comment , and instead of writing a boring comment i added a more interesting one. I think my comment spices up your article a bit. As for ''On one hand you said you blocked me on the other your here commenting, why'' 1) reason is that i like to participate in ALL articles even those that I have blocked or have blocked me 2) reason is I wanted to use your comment to make my own statements about the results of the elections and the election procedure instead of making a new article. No need for my readers to donate 100 more just for an article about my election outcome. 3) reason is even though i have blocked you it does not mean i will not ''monitor'' you and your actions to evaluate your thoughts and the things you say. By blocking you it is a reminder that i must be careful from you and when i see the green arrow in the circle just after your name it is a reminder to be aware of what may come from you in any means of way. 4th reason why i comment is Your article was new and the only one available and since i am on many hours i get bored. So i commented. 5) and YES there was a reason to write THIS and the above because you gave me the reason by MAKING AN article. So anyone that makes an article AUTOMATICALLY GIVES REASON to everyone and anyone to make comments and express their opinion. So thank you for this space here. Tax free.
Gizza some special George lager
voted
Congrats Wingfield, best of luck.
Thanks
V + c