eUSA Congress - Learning about the Congressional Budget Office
Carlos3652
I started to do some research in the eUSA forums because I was interested in becoming a congressman and earn my medal. As I was digging deeper into the administration side of things I found something that seems od
😛
On the surface, everything looks great (Click Here).
Of the last 35 law proposals over the last 31 days (as of this article) all but one passed. A proposal where the minimum wage was raised from $1 to $4 (lost resounding 36-6)
By looking at these latest law proposals you would think that members of Congress are getting along and working through party lines to get things done. At the end of the day, all we want is to be represented by a smooth well oiled machine, by ensuring we have money, we get the right bonuses when we need them, and ensure everything is as it should be. And that seems to be the case with most Congressmen.
But if you look a little bit closer, you start to see something interesting...
Exhibit A - The last 5 Congressional Budget Office Donations
Yes 22, No 13
Yes 22, No 17
Yes 24, No 12
Yes 23, No 11
Yes 26, No 15
Little Backgroun
😛
The Congressional Budget Office is an organization belonging to the government of the United States of America. The CBO is used to distribute American tax dollars as directed by the Congressional budget, to eUS government funded organizations
It was founded in 2009 by long time eUSA citizen OneEye.
The CBO is the in game "organization" which issues funding to all congressionally budgeted line items. It has been managed flawlessly by several legendary eUS players together without a single mishap or misappropriation or instance of theft. These are former active citizens whose interest in the game waned but whose dedication to the community was such that they have continued to serve us nearly thanklessly.
Reference
--- Link to eUSA Forums showing CBO
So as a newbie with 0 knowledge on how this game works, I felt like there was a problem here. There is a story here to tell. Why are people opposing funding to the eUSA programs? Why are congressmen who have been voted in to steer the country in the right direction opposing the one thing that keeps our programs afloat. Is there a problem with the amount of money being donated?
Well after additional research this is a non story and a non issue. Sorry to be the one to burst the bubble on the sensationalism of the above. Let me explain why, so everyone that up to this point who had the same questions as I can learn what I have learned.
There is a game within a game in the politics realm. Allegedly the main culprits of the these No's are congressmen from the Socialist Freedom Party (SFP). I reached out to Maxwell Hanz who is the spokesmen to get a comment on the reason behind these votes. Per Maxwell "I am uncertain on how all of our congressmen voted but the SFP does not have any particular stance on the recent CBO votes. I personally feel they are necessary and vital for our nation."
Anonymous sources close to these proceedings mentioned that they (SFP) tend to vote NO on pretty much everything that the rest of congress votes YES on, and once in a while they will put up a bill that they will all vote YES on which everyone else ends up voting NO.
Again, this all sounds like a juicy set up - but in actuality this has been happening for a very long time... I ran down the CBO donation votes and the same ratio of yes and no's always applied. Also, guess what, the NO's have never won. And even if the NO's would win, nothing would happen. LOLZ Right?
So this struggle within the Politics world, is not a true struggle, just some Congress role playing for kicks and giggles. The Congressman that are being voted in on a monthly basis are doing their job and helping eUSA be as prosperous as it can be. Big thanks to all that play the game and are active.
I hope to learn more about the politics in the eRep world and share with you my findings.
Comments
V!!
I think your anonymous sources close to these proceedings are just telling what they think is true without knowing the facts or are really partisan and just want to blame SFP (it is within their rights to do so and it is how I know several members of congress do).
I have been elected several times in the congress as member of SFP and I have vote always yes to CBO donation proposals and I know that more of the SFP members of congress said they voted yes too (as there is no way to check what they really voted I cannot say what they have voted). I don't want to be part of the congress any more due to the hatred spoiled on the eUSA forums (and some of SFP are guilty for that too).
It would be awesome when younger players would be majority in the congress (and being leaders would be far better too) so the feud could have a minor impact.
Good luck in the congress, I think it is needed hard.
@Niemand - great comment - The article is not putting blame on SFP or its congressman. Its shedding light on the game within the game. Thanks again for your comment and I would love to interview you as a former congressman to get some truth from you. 🙂
Your article is good (informative and pleasant). That is why I made a reply. You could interview me, but because I am almost retired (selling all my companies to nice people at low price, giving away my money and resources) maybe it is more interesting to interview a really active person. 🙂
"Aging is not lost youth but a new stage of opportunity and strength." Betty Friedan - You have a lot of history and knowledge - would not want that to go to waste.
@Niemand - you know I respect you personally. Are you saying that you do not believe that the majority of "no" votes come from SFP?
It is a difficult question. Last time it was 22-17 votes. When majority of the no votes would come from SFP and only TBSP also voted no, it would mean 9 of those no voters would be from SFP. There where 10 of SFP elected that month, Tef1 had left the congress. 9/9 from SFP will have voted no? I doubt that all SFP members have voted, I think at least one will have voted yes (SFP is never fully united, most of them are free thinkers) so I think that the majority of no voters are not SFP although it can be a big group of the no voters.
Excellent article.
The only thing missing is the role BSP might also play in voting "no".
did you re-publish this one?
good article
I took it down as I did not have the full picture. I waited for more information to come in and I republished with edits and additional comments. It was more informational this time around vs speculative and sensational.
okay, i thought i had voted and endorsed so yea. 🙂
it's a good topic of conversation.
Thanks for endorsing 😉 appreciate you taking the time to read it.
Investigative article, I like.
I think the biggest driver of the no voters is a desire by some in congress for greater transparency. However, no majority bloc can agree what that greater transparency would look like. The majority are soundly for the status quo. Additionally, I believe that the recent perceived intransigence of a CBO director to publish the disclosures outlined in statute continues to fuel this fire of mistrust of the system. It certainly isn't winning hearts and minds over to the CBO model. I do not think the CBO directors care much about that, which in a way is a good thing. It demonstrates that they are trying to stay above politics to a degree.
Great comment - are there threads in the forum showing what proposed transparency would look like? Has anyone done the 5 why’s to get to the root problem and try to propose solutions / opportunities? My biggest concern is that the no’s are just part of the game via role play of protest - not because it’s an actual problem. And again, no one is trying it to stop the funding of the programs that feed the eUSA. And even if they did get it to not pass, it wouldn’t be a problem to fund those programs.
The main issue with CBOs is the fact that the money doesn't really go there.
Whomever mentioned us was hating. That's not our policy.
I think the SFP stance was made clear by Maxwell (that there was not one) in the article. Although he did state that he did not know how the congressmen from the party voted.
Directed at the person who said we generally vote, "No."
I'm not sure how they could know what we vote, but that's a misrepresentation.
Congressional Budget Office
The CBO and its Directors are disliked because there is several million in the Country Reserve for which they either can't or simply won't accounted for. As can be seen in the above organization just short of 1.5 million is all that is actually in the CBO. The rest is 'being held' by private citizens who don't even play this game anymore, two of whom never even appear on the eUSA Forums.
How much money is “several million”? Is this a recent development and is it a documented amount? Why does it matter if it’s in the visible section or not, as long as it’s there and can be used when needed if it’s documented.
If the CBO has a stellar reputation of ensuring that the country programs always have money, and the users that hold the money don’t play the game, wouldn’t that be the safest place for it to be - considering they love the game so much to help the eUSA community?
Depends on what you call documentation. A vote to 'donate' $400,000 takes place. The CC is then transferred to the CBO. After that, it is placed with one of the three 'directors'. Once a month in 'Private Congress' it is revealed how much is actually in the Reserve, therefore, dropping a veil of secrecy over all of it.
Also, you might want to research the SCI who can authorize the use of those funds without Congressional Consent, once again in secret.