Join the new world

Dear Feds, before I start I should apologize to you all about the delay in releasing this article, but I had to gather some info, unfortunately I could not at the end, so here is the article.
I said in the last article that I will declare my opinion in the candidates in another article, and here it is, down here I will analyze each candidate with respect to some parameters detailed down here, but before I say anything I should state that any of the following does not mean that any of the candidates is not qualified to be PP, they all fit and they are all great and they can lead as to a better future. This is only a way to say who is the best, again they are all awesome. And now let's begin:

We are having four parameters to analyze: Past experience, Choosing VPP, Campaign, Debate answers. Each will have a degree out of 10 for first and last parameters and out of 5 for the 2nd and 3rd ones.

Angelini:

Past experience: from here previous positions we could see that Angelini is a great leader, being SoD is not easy and demands special leading abilities. Also we see that she has some XP in the congress as a 4-times congresswoman (2 of them in the military committee), so we are having a candidate of great leadership XP and an awesome mili background. Yeah we need reorganizing our stuff , and ofc who will be better than a mili leader to do so , but let us do forget that we are already having the basics of this organization we only need to refresh it, I may add that Angelini's XP is almost in the national lvl and not in the party lvl , yeah she has always been a leadership in the party , but without great activity inside the party lobbies ( as you can see from her forums activity , which is the least in the 33 candidates). Also I may add that Angelini's political XP is not as much as her mili XP (yeah she was VPP once but that was in another party a long time ago). Also her XP in media is not as her mili too; her leadership for media dept was a long time ago. Also I may add that having such an old age (in game ofc 😛) although it in some way a good sign, but in the other way and specially in our case is not so good, as we need new blood in the party as a whole, in this game when you are young you have more power and energy, no doubt at this point. So I may give her 7 out of 10.

Choosing VPP: I may say simply that Angelini was the best candidate to choose a VPP that fit with her, Mitch is a mili hero, his past XP in EZC is well known, he had nearly all the positions within the EZC, also he was the military director for the Feds, I think I am fair to say that he and Angelini are the best couple. But he also has the same problems that Angelini has. As he has no political XP except for the party ambassador part; which means good relations with some parties but not in the political life as a whole. And so I give Angelini 3 out of 5

Campaign : Angelini was the first to MM the party, although we are not so familiar with the elections campaign in the party ( and that is why I am rating it out of 5 only ) we should rate how the three candidates did, but I may also add that Angelini's PM and her article was talking about herself and her past more than talking about what she is going to do about the party, which is a mistake in my opinion. And so I give Angelini 4 out of 5

Debate answers : I rated every question out of 2 and Angelini got ( 2 , 1 , 1.5 , 2 , 1.5 ) in each question respectively , which means 8 out of 10.

This gives Angelini 22 out of 30.

HobbitTon:

Past experience: we have a good XP here also, Hobbit has very good XP in the economy of this country, also he had some good experiments in the diplomatic field, and ofc some good XP in congress (6 terms), and he is also a well known face in Media. That is all great but what about his leading XP? Hobbit has been an officer in the TC and Cav and this gives him some good leading XP, also he was a PP once but in another party (the ADTP), but let's not forget the fact that the ADTP was only <10 members back then, also I may add that the whole XP was pretty success. But in that month Hobbit had the PP XP and also the PD XP, yeah not in full scale and ofc not in a big party like feds but, still good XP. We also need to remember that Hobbit came back to the feds very soon which means he was some kind away in the previous period. One last thing Hobbit is the youngest in all of them (in-game ofc I mean). So I give Hobbit 6 out of 10.

Choosing VPP: Hobbit has the best VPP ever, Davidlandon, who is better than a previous PP? but we should not forget that DL is not active as he was in the past , I still did not have a reply on my Pm to him 3 days ago , so I give Hobbit 4 out of 5

Campaign: Hobbit was the worst in the campaign although he is the best candidate in media XP, which means he should know better than all how campaign could make difference. So I give him 2 out of 5.

Debate answers: well, Hobbit in the first two questions made me feel like fool, his answers were too long, which may help in an article but it will be hard for some answers for debate questions which could have been made on IRC, where big answers will make audiences fell asleep. So
Hobbit got (.5, .5, 1, 2, 1) which gives him 5 out of 10.

So Hobbit has total 17 out of 30.

JDR1986:

Past experience: we have here a previous VPP, previous PD, and FOP director, which surely indicates great XP in both leading abilities and ofc political XP, we have also some good congress XP with 4 terms in it (2 of it as IES director), I also may add that he has some mentoring XP himself which we need most in the party today, yeah he has no such national career like Angelini but this is a party elections after all. So I give JDR 8 out 10

Choosing VPP: jacksondr5 has good congress XP (4 terms) and also he is the info director which means he is good at communication with party (which is the main point of the VPP). Yeah he is not the best VPP in all three, but as I can see he is the most active of them, which our party needs now. And so I give JDR 4 out of 5.

Campaign: JDR did not start his campaign early which lost him some points, but he wrote 2 articles and his VPP wrote another, and I may add that he had another member in the crew, who was responsible for the MM (yeah it is me 😛) and I think his campaign made some good results specially after the MM (JDR got 18 votes, when he was only 9 before MM ). And so I give him 4 out of 5.

Debate answers : JDR got (1 , 2 ,1 ,1.5 ,and 1.5 ) in the questions respectively , which gave him 7 out of 10 totals.

And so JDR got 23 out of 30


So here are the final results again

Angelini : 22
HobbitTon : 17
JDR : 23


General notes :
1- All the above is ofc my personal opinion , some may agree some may not .
2- I did not enter my feelings in all those opinions , because if so would have made HobbitTon the highest number as I consider him my best friend in all the three candidates , where we head together to the ADTP and we came back also together, when I served VPP under his command as a PP.
3- All the above opinions does not mean that any of the candidates is not capable of leading this party to a better future ( as you all saw they all succeeded  )
4- I had more to say about each candidate ( especially in the debate answers which I was planning to make a full analysis of it but due to the current circumstances it will be hard ) . But any way I consider this is good enough.
5- This article does not mean that JDR will win, as I said it is only my opinion and there are more reasons affecting ppl's choice in the elections than an article written by a man like me.






Last thing: I hereby announce that this may be my last work for the feds, as I will be going to eEgypt , yes it will be found soon ( in 7 days actually ) and it is time to play under my Rl flag, which I waited for more than a year and a half. I love you all, I do not know if I will succeed there or not, but either way I will be as I was before a P/H Fed.